Romani declinet esset committitur cum Hannibal, post Romani dilatatio in Gallia, Britannia, Hiberiae, Africa, Aegypto, Graecia, etc necesse. Maxime post incursione ad Indus et in Germania. Scio est satis ASB sed putant tribus potuit actu causatur a declinet de Romam in Gallia, et intellego Saxonum potuit tandem capta super Britannia, post omnes erat vere iustus impedimenta Romam usque 14 saeculo cum unita insulis. Tamen erat certus possibile ut a wank de Romam, si iustus Possedi ibi agere simul in India successionem magna imperatores erant in via ad incursio Sinis per Mongoliam.
Any Roman decline would have to start with Hannibal, after that Roman expansion into Gaul, Britannia, Iberia, Africa, Egypt, Greece, etc was inevitable. Especially after the invasion down to the Indus and into Germania. I know it is fairly ASB but I think some tribes could have actually caused a decline of Rome in Gaul, and I am aware the Saxons could have eventually taken over Britannia, after all it was really just baggage for Rome until the 14th century when they united the isles. However it was definitely possible to make a wank of Rome, if they had just gotten there act together in India the succession of great emperors were on their way to an invasion of China through Mongolia.