True, no intelligent person today can deny the unfortunate measures taken by the National Socialsit Government against large populations of particular ethnic origins, or that a sizeable portion of said population died as a direct result of said policies. And yes, the suffering and death resulting from these developments are, to most anyone with feeling, considered to be tragic. The German people have, at the urging of the Reparation Activists and Zionists, “borne witness” to the the fact and image of our former Fuehrer's policy of population cleansing -- the records of human experimntation, the images of large quantities of emaciated human remains, and the (now) uncontrevertable knowledge of wide-scale use of coerced labor, and how German consumers benefited for over two decades from said labor -- just about all Germans and Europeans who own a television or read a newspaper will by now be familiar with a good deal of this.
But this, of course, only tells part of the story -- following the 1969 Revolution, which saw the restortation of republican institutions in the Fatherland, there were subsequent reforms in the 1970's which saw the return of those rights and priviledges taken from portions of the German citizenry, including Jews; today, these citizens can boast of more civil liberties than are enjoyed by the American Negro, or the non Japanese residents of the Oriental Empire. (The fact that there are fewer of them to enjoy these priviledges as a result of this history might indeed be a factor, but if so, it seems ironic, at best, for descendants of the survivors should want to compain about such a turn of events.)
This is to not even mention that Germany is hardly unique in how she has profited from the violent nature of history -- similar, if less technologically developed, policies informed American policies toward their native nations for the bulk of the 19th Century and much of the 20th; reports of similar practices by the Empire of Japan in their rise around this time are coming to light as well; the Russian and Soviet threat to the East certainly didn't maintain itself by kindness, and nor, of course, did the British Empire. (Indeed, the island which stood as the dominant power in the 19th Century has more to answer for today than ten Germanies, as violence in India, the Middle East, and Africa attest.)
Then again, to be sure, if Germany is not alone in commiting violent acts to secure prosperity for her people, then the Reparationists among her people are not alone in finding this fundamental aspect of their history wanting. Similar sentiments among the native nations and negros of America can be found in their organisations, and the leadership of nations comprised of the former colonized have expressed these sentiments from time to time as well. Still, there is perhaps no stranger idea than the notion that power should apologize for existing and exercizing itself. (Perhaps had Germany lost the war to secure the continent, her people might feel differently about this, and in turn, about these actions; but it does little good to speculate about such matters.)