DBWI: how did you live the war?

Do any of you actually believe that the treaty shall really get rid of Nuclear weapon in North America? cause I don't
 

MrP

Banned
That so-called treaty is nothing more than the whims of the Madagascan Sultanate made corporeal. There's no chance it'll be accepted by the IOC. None.

Landshark said:
((I'm sorry did you say something? I was busy licking a cow))
(OOC: LMAO! :D )
 
Redem said:
Do any of you actually believe that the treaty shall really get rid of Nuclear weapon in North America? cause I don't

In some places maybe.

Virginia certainly doesn't have any and New York and New England may have the expertise to build them but also have very good reasons not to.

Pacifica never had them in the first place and at the moment needs to focus on getting it's civilian economy working again.

I wouldn't put it past the Texans to keep a few hidden away and if the Texans keep them the Californians will too.
 
(ok this map was made on the rush but it should give a nice little idea how balkanise it is)

ReallybalkaniseNA.jpg
 
I can understand that Texas would want to keep some nukes. After all, they managed to annoy the Germans, the British, AND the french equally during the war. That really takes some skill...:eek:

Say, Landshark, how do you think Montana and the rest of the anarchic west should be dealed with?
 
In Sweden we lost a great deal of trade, and of course the internet and lots of television shows, so it was no picknick let me tell you!

No, actually, it was okay, compared to the war zones, but there was a lot of unemployment for a while with the shaky economy.

Oh, communist groups took the opportunity to burn and loot in Stockholm and Gothenburg - again - but this time the police actually did something, captured a thousand of them all in all with the help of the military and expelled them to Africa. Stockholm has never been so peaceful.
 
((how much nation can you count?)

You know it's kinda funny, Montana is the only place European don't want to be "peacekeeper".
 
Andromedos said:
Say, Landshark, how do you think Montana and the rest of the anarchic west should be dealed with?

There's not much that can be done. While it's relatively easy to impose some sort of order in the cities the rest of the area is too large and underpopulated to be policed effectively.

The only good thing that can be said for the situation is that most of the trouble is criminal in nature rather than political.

Not that that comes as any comfort to the farmers the gangs prey upon.

((Nice map but possibly too dependent on the OTL state borders, particularly in the west and mid west where the ruler factory states are))
 
For good reasons, Redem. Montana is an anarchistic hellhole with too much metall in the air. I lost my left leg at Great Falls, and the prime of the Weltreichwehr's Alpine troops perished there.
 
((Yeah but borders are hard to do, for me at least, beside it was a rushed one)

Well wasn't the place you know "pacify" before the U.S broke away?

I'm not sure it's a better thing the trouble better when it's criminal, I mean a lot gangs from Montana come down in other country to make trouble.
 
Redem said:
((how much nation can you count?)

You know it's kinda funny, Montana is the only place European don't want to be "peacekeeper".

((I count 24, or 25 if Alaska is included))

Deseret may not have nukes, but I know by now it probably has repaired the damage done to the mines so it probably has the ore. It would have had them during the war, but their ore stockpile went missing and has never been found. New Mexico/Arizona without a doubt has the ore, and the capability to make them. Colorado/Wyoming might have the ore, but not the capability or desire to make them.
 
Im just wondering but of thouse of us who fought did anyone earn any citations?

I was a Captain-Scout by wars end in the 3rd Partisans

And when it was all over I was awarded the Mountaneer metal in Harrisburg after a little thing in the Berkshires when we pushed for Boston...
 

Deleted member 1487

I can't believe that there are no vets of the chicago siege here. I know there aren't many of us left after that mess, but you would think that someone here would have been there. I know that it is hard to remember. Anyway I was in the 5th illinois light infantry division. I was a platoon leader when the seige started and by the end was commanding a battalion. Not that we were anywhere near full strength. Thank god the marines landed around midway when they did, or those kentuckians would have run us into the lake. I was wounded by a sniper a month before the end, which kept me out of that bloodbath around peoria. Lost a lot of good friends though.
 
Pacifica without any doubts does not have nukes. After all, it is the most pacifistic nation in north america. This mix of libertarian and green politics is one reason why I enjoy living here so much.
Of course, Pacifica then was in pretty much trouble when the warlords came out of Montana, and Deseret started to look for blood. Without the German forces, and the help send by Canada... *nods in Landsharks direction*
 
rowmaster said:
Im just wondering but of thouse of us who fought did anyone earn any citations?

I was a Captain-Scout by wars end in the 3rd Partisans

And when it was all over I was awarded the Mountaneer metal in Harrisburg after a little thing in the Berkshires when we pushed for Boston...

I got the Iron cross 1st class after we defended Boston against Quebec.
And I also remember that you guys pushing up from the south did not make our job easier...
 
Top