I just read about how DNVP, NSDAP, Centre and DVP merged to become CDU in 1931, and Hitler became a Chancellor of Germany as a moderate. If that unification didn't happen and Hitler took power, could he become a dictator?
You probably meant franco.This question is a sort of indirect way of questioning the Picasso regime in Spain isn't it?
Love me some Franco works.The painter?
Love me some Franco works.
My favorite is Covadonga.
He really makes you feel the horror of the Red bombing.
Based on what I read about during WW2, he's no figurehead. he was a core leader of Allied forces who defeated Picasso's Phalange regime and Mussolini's Fascist regime.More like a figurehead used by the likes of Von Papen or Schacht who would run the show from the shadows. That said, it doesn't mean that Germany wouldn't have become a dictatorship - it has already been moving in that direction in Hindenburg's last years in the office, what with him invoking the Article 48 left and right.
Hitler? Too ASB. You never read Mein Kampf, his memoir. "The power focused on one man is never desirable. Even in Ancient Monarchies, the power was split along with privy council."He could become a dictator. Not like a "declare himself to be the leader of a resurrected Viking empire and try to conquer the entire world by exterminating half of a continent and selling them into slavery with the intent of creating a caste system placing his nation as a new global aristocracy shaped by eternal war" dictator--that level of craziness just isn't possible--but maybe he would be like a typical pro-militarist dictator of South Europe.
"declare himself to be the leader of a resurrected Viking empire and try to conquer the entire world by exterminating half of a continent and selling them into slavery with the intent of creating a caste system placing his nation as a new global aristocracy shaped by eternal war".
I suppose Picasso's views did become more extreme over time, due to influence from his advisers, including the lunatic Julius Evola.That was close to what picasso actually said..
While Franco's early work was seminal and inspiring his failure to join other artists in defying the dictatorships sprouting up around them seemed to be a turning point. His later work lacked the fire he had come to be known for and he more or less became a parody of himself seemingly only engaging in art to pay for his drug habit or another night in a Munich brothel.
Meanwhile in Madrid the society closes itself off more and more from the rest of the world and those few visitors that are allowed to leave say the Spanish experience has become surreal.
While Franco's early work was seminal and inspiring his failure to join other artists in defying the dictatorships sprouting up around them seemed to be a turning point. His later work lacked the fire he had come to be known for and he more or less became a parody of himself seemingly only engaging in art to pay for his drug habit or another night in a Munich brothel.
Meanwhile in Madrid the society closes itself off more and more from the rest of the world and those few visitors that are allowed to leave say the Spanish experience has become surreal.
I'd certainly call the terrifying death worship festival Picasso held in 1942 surreal.
It doesn't get much more surreal than several thousand Legionaries and Regulares compelling confused and terrified Madrileños to bow down before a giant statue of death itself.
I think it was about at that point a lot of his supporters decided that it wasn't really possible to rationalize his regime as defending 'order' or 'stability' anymore.
Well he was ousted officially in 1944 but his government actually survived until 1945 with the help of French occupation troops in the north--even though the south of Spain was occupied by Britain.Luckly, we won't see these again.That was why he was ousted in 1944. Spain is a booming democracy as of 1959.