Dr Pervez Hoodbhoy
Banned
Why would Denmark be compensated, or are we to assume that it was not neutral in the scenario presented?![]()
I'm thinking the Entente might want to reverse the process of Danicization by directing some of the irredentism in Germany towards the north.
OOC: "Danicization" is TTL's equivalent of Finlandization. It actually started before the POD, after the 2nd War of Schleswig.
Why dissolve Bulgaria entirely?
The Bulgarians themselves would request it after the anti-CP, pro-Yugoslav Agrarian leader Alexander Stambolijski would come to power. Since the alternative would be a large loss of territory to the Serbs, most of his countrymen would go along with it.
Maybe they'd try to unite the whole place into a strong Yugoslav state that included Montenegro with a small Hungary and large Romania as neighbors.
Montenegro had its own monarchy. It would eventually join the federal kingdom, no doubt, but only after some sort of personal union was arranged.
I wonder also of the Czech and Slovak lands could have been attached to this hypothetical Yugoslavia too.
Then it wouldn't be Yugoslav anymore. But I don't think either side would be interested.
I suspect that the Americans might have a different idea for Palestine, assuming that they are involved in the negotiations.
Such as?
Also, as much as the Greek irridentists wanted that land by the coast, if I recall correctly, there lived in the area many non-Greeeks, and Greece controlling that area might cause some problems.
Those non-Greeks will have the same fate as the non-Greeks (and non-Christian Greeks) in the territories acquired before the Great War.
I had some more thoughts regarding this thread:
1) A stronger Britain will probably be able to solve the Irish issue in terms more to its liking and the Unionist-Nationalist confrontations in Ulster would be quickly suppressed. I expect that 4, 5, maybe 6 Ulster counties with Protestant majorities would be excluded from devolution, but I couldn't tell you how long that would last.
2) Given the traditional British policy of maintaining a balance of power on the continent, Germany is more likely to retain Upper Silesia and some territory west of the Rhine - I'm thinking of a strip of territory from Ludwigshafen to somewhere north of Aachen, allowing them to keep all the important German cities on the left bank of the river while leaving it without any serious potential for an attack on France and Belgium.
3) The dividing line between French and Belgian gains would be the Moselle river. The Dutch might also receive some territory for the same reasons the Danes would.
4) Regarding the Slovak territory gained by the Czechs, it'd probably extend east as far as Kassa, but I think it unlikely that it would reach the Danube to the south. Almost all of it would probably be highland.
5) Great Britain would be interested in parts of Kamerun: the Cameroon Range, the coast down to the Sanaga river and the access to lake Chad. These would all benefit British Nigeria.
6) Portugal might still eventually be forced to sell some of its colonies, and Germany would be in no position to make an offer.
Last edited: