DBWI: Explain this map of Europe.

Your HRE theory seems likely. That being said, I have no idea why it looks so decentralized.

Also, I noticed that Egypt seems to be doing well. Maybe a Ptolemaic-esque situation, except it's more Roman?

I would think that this HRE is in the middle of some kind of civil war, with several people trying to get the crown.

About Egypt. Yes, I thought that the Pharaos were back...

What is a Hungary? I can't find that name literally anywhere.

Mmmm... Hungary... hunger...

OMG! They are Hunic Man-Heaters!
 
Also what is with that "Ottoman Empire"? I've heard of the Ottoman Turks in university, but they live very far away, west of the Oxian Lake! (OOC: the Aral Sea, Lacus Oxianus) It makes no sense for them to be in Anatolia and the Balkans!
 
Also what is with that "Ottoman Empire"? I've heard of the Ottoman Turks in university, but they live very far away, west of the Oxian Lake! (OOC: the Aral Sea, Lacus Oxianus) It makes no sense for them to be in Anatolia and the Balkans!
That would certainly explain it, but first there's the question of what might've driven them to make such a migration.
 
What's with that odd Hispania split between three countries?
It makes a lot of sense, actually.

“Spain” I assume is derived from “Hispania”. Possibly some sort of pan-Hispanian movement, or just a merger between multiple states that used it as a compromise name.
The blue one near the coast seems to be an Euscadian state, as all of its area is majority ethnically Euscadian IOTL (except maybe around the southeastern tip). Considering that the Euscadians are the Euscadians, a people apart from the rest Europe who have historically been neutral, they probably would not want to join “Spain”.
“Portugal” is harder. There was a state called “Portugali” which did control (and have a capital in) the northernmost part of this “Portugal”, but most of its land was in “Spain”. I could, however, see them surviving and re-orienting from “control the Douro river” to becoming a maritime power expanding down the coast. Those specific borders are bizarre, though.
 
Last edited:
That would certainly explain it, but first there's the question of what might've driven them to make such a migration.
Exactly, that's why I'm surprised. Maybe Zhongguo conquered the Turkish Steppe, forced the Turkish tribes out, and the Ottomans united them under their banner. But that's just my theory.
 
Also what is with that "Ottoman Empire"? I've heard of the Ottoman Turks in university, but they live very far away, west of the Oxian Lake! (OOC: the Aral Sea, Lacus Oxianus) It makes no sense for them to be in Anatolia and the Balkans!
History has shown that steppe nomads can end up in bizarre places without major displacements. There is a Jurchenic [OOC : Tunguskic] language pocket in the Carpathians descended from a steppe nomad conquest about 800 years ago, although the language has almost entirely died out.
 
The Holy Roman Empire was the Roman Empire after being Christiansomething, but they lost Rome to someone called Papal -and then created a dinasty, I suppose. Then, a Germanic warrior named Otto conquered the Eastern part of the Empire and renamed after him.

Hispania, I suppose, became some kind of HRE-puppet -keeping a translated version of the original name gives a hint.

That thing called France evades me. It looks like a nice place to plunder and devastate, tough.
Ok, I've got a wack theory about the Papal States. It's a bit silly, but it can explain them: so Rome becomes Christian in this world, right? Well, the head of the Christian religion is a successor of Peter, whom Jesus of Nazareth made the head and the father of all Christians. Father - papa in Latin. Now, if Christianity takes over Rome, it would be only natural for the Eternal City to become the center of the religion, just like it happened with many religions IOTL. The papa of Christianity took Rome over, or got it from the Empire, given that it's Holy. State of the papa - Papal State - Papal States.
 
But why would the ROMAN empire give up ROME?

No idea. Why would Rome be in the "Holy Roman Empire” (the majority of that territory was never part of the original Roman Empire)?
Why would it be a bunch of states made of border gore each labeled indpendently?
Why would it call itself “Holy” and “Roman” when it does not control Rome and the state which controls Rome is probably more holy than it is?
 
No idea. Why would Rome be in the "Holy Roman Empire” (the majority of that territory was never part of the original Roman Empire)?
Why would it be a bunch of states made of border gore each labeled indpendently?
Why would it call itself “Holy” and “Roman” when it does not control Rome and the state which controls Rome is probably more holy than it is?
In fact, is it even an empire? Because if that scattershot mess of color is to be believed, it seems more like a confederation or something.
 
In fact, is it even an empire? Because if that scattershot mess of color is to be believed, it seems more like a confederation or something.
My theory is that "Holy Roman Empire" and "Papal States" were accidentally swapped by the map-maker, with the "Papal States" being vassals of Rome (or, possibly, being patriarchates subordinated to Rome).
 
Why is Poland so small and seemingly migrating south? Are the Poles nomadic here? Also, what's a "Hungary" and why is it hungry for Bohemia?
 
Top