DBWI CubanMissile doesn't go hot.

14 american cities in florida, Alabama, and Lousiana died, in Europe quick mobilization, luck, and skill saved England from being hit. France was lucky to lose only a couple cities, of the Nato Allies Germany and Turky got hit the worst. The soviets in their vengful death throws spitfully struck at enemy, neutral and in the case of china ally alike.

It was only the quick intiital strikes against soviet missle and bomb sights that kept the causality list as low as it was. In 24 hours five hundred cities were destroyed by the soviets, half of those bombs were used on comunist china. An act of treason the chinese still feel to this day.

One forth of the bombs that fell fell on neutral powers, and the rest fell on Nato and Nato allies. There were miracles South Korea, Israel, and Saudi Arabia escaped untouched, dispite being targets of the soviet regieme.

but what would our world look like if the Cuban Missile crisis had been handled peacefully if the nuclear war that followed had not happened?
 
Who knows. Most likely the Soviets would have never managed to keep their allies if they were willing to attack even the Chinese. I can't imagine too many people actually like dealing with them.

The best guess I can give is that the Cold War would have petered out after the Soviets pissed away their allies one at a time before fracturing under it's own weight.

The rest of the world would have eventually come over to the right side and a golden age would have happened with great scientific advances in fields we can't even dream of. Probably would have had flying cars and shit by now too.
 
IC: Maybe the United States would be more prosperous. As it stands, we only reached pre-war living standards in the 1990s.

14 american cities in florida, Alabama, and Lousiana died, in Europe quick mobilization, luck, and skill saved England from being hit. France was lucky to lose only a couple cities, of the Nato Allies Germany and Turky got hit the worst. The soviets in their vengful death throws spitfully struck at enemy, neutral and in the case of china ally alike.

It was only the quick intiital strikes against soviet missle and bomb sights that kept the causality list as low as it was. In 24 hours five hundred cities were destroyed by the soviets, half of those bombs were used on comunist china. An act of treason the chinese still feel to this day.

OOC: England and France escaping intact? I'm sorry, but NO. If America gets hit bad, it stands to reason that England and France are gonna be obliterated. Also, the Soviet Union and China were no longer friends by 1962.
 
IC: Maybe the United States would be more prosperous. As it stands, we only reached pre-war living standards in the 1990s.



OOC: England and France escaping intact? I'm sorry, but NO. If America gets hit bad, it stands to reason that England and France are gonna be obliterated. Also, the Soviet Union and China were no longer friends by 1962.

http://rense.com/general47/global.htm

OCC 3,322 russian nukes, during the time it was estimated that Russia had at max around sixty intercontential missles, Were going with the world being lucky that only 500 cities were destroyed by the russians. Basically some one in Cuba got ansty and launched, most of the weapons were not properally calibrated and their were some misfires. The Nato counter gets lucky and takes out most of the russian nukes. Theres still plenty of death and Mayhem but Nato only loses 75 cities. Neutral powers end up losing 75 cities and china gets hit hard because no one saw that coming. OCC
 
http://rense.com/general47/global.htm

OCC 3,322 russian nukes, during the time it was estimated that Russia had at max around sixty intercontential missles, Were going with the world being lucky that only 500 cities were destroyed by the russians. Basically some one in Cuba got ansty and launched, most of the weapons were not properally calibrated and their were some misfires. The Nato counter gets lucky and takes out most of the russian nukes. Theres still plenty of death and Mayhem but Nato only loses 75 cities. Neutral powers end up losing 75 cities and china gets hit hard because no one saw that coming. OCC

OOC: I didn't know missiles had propellers.:p
 
What does It Matter

With world fertility levels below 1%, thanks to radiation, dust, and other crap, we have else to worry about. The nuke which hit Atlanta unleashed all those mutated viruses from the CDC, and we are almost dead as a species, so STFU! :mad:

By the way, our commune has a slight excess of Vidan-3 and some spare chickens. Anyone got something to trade? :eek:
 
Maybe Disney would of built a amusement park in Fla like Disneyland in California.

Politically for the US the south might of started to gain more power in the seventy's and eighties as older people moved south and company's fallowed south to cut cost.

As a New Englander I'm happy that the Russian subs got sunk when they did or we could of lost NYC or Boston.
 
With world fertility levels below 1%, thanks to radiation, dust, and other crap, we have else to worry about. The nuke which hit Atlanta unleashed all those mutated viruses from the CDC, and we are almost dead as a species, so STFU! :mad:

By the way, our commune has a slight excess of Vidan-3 and some spare chickens. Anyone got something to trade? :eek:

OOC: Sub-1% fertility rates? Humanity near extinction? I'm sorry, but the aftermath of a nuclear war in 1962 would not be that bad. There wasn't enough nukes. Whatever you're smoking, you should lay off.

IC: I see the Maddox family's cult-sorry, commune-has somehow gotten GlobalNet access.
 
Last edited:
There's no reason for the Soviets and the Chinese to nuke each other just yet. The Soviets didn't develop warplanes to take the PRC down with them at this point. Even with the Sino-Soviet split.
 
IC: Maybe the United States would be more prosperous. As it stands, we only reached pre-war living standards in the 1990s.



OOC: England and France escaping intact? I'm sorry, but NO. If America gets hit bad, it stands to reason that England and France are gonna be obliterated. Also, the Soviet Union and China were no longer friends by 1962.

France makes sense if de Gaulle played his cards right
 
There's no reason for the Soviets and the Chinese to nuke each other just yet. The Soviets didn't develop warplanes to take the PRC down with them at this point. Even with the Sino-Soviet split.

OOC:This is a DBWI. We're not asking "What if Russia and China nuked each other", we're posting from the perspective of a world where they did nuke each other.

IC: Well, there's no doubt that China would be better off. While the area under the control of the Republic of China is doing well, the rump People's Republic of China is just ghastly.
 
Top