I think it was why dubya was regarded as worst president. Saddam agreed to dismantle any potential NBC weapons.. But it was revealed to be lie in 2010s when new secret facility for bioweapons was discovered. Despite Saddam cracked down on AQ, his dictatorship was just as bad.After 9/11, many people thought that Saddam Hussein had ties with AQ and thus he must be overthrown. However, efforts to overthrow him and his government did not materialize. What if America did, though? How would Iraq, and the ME region in general, look like today?
But let's be fair here, if the US invaded Iraq early on in 2000s, Saddam's family would not rule Iraq until this day.
Today Uday Hussein ruled Iraq with his bloody fist, and everyone becomes partially blind to the Kurdish genocide, because the current Dictator of Iraq let US Oil Company working there after normalization of Iraqi relations with US and Israel in 2009
Whoa?Saddam's rule would've not lasted another decade. If America does invade, there is never a civil war in Iraq following the Arab Spring after the regime fired on peaceful protestors Saddam and his sons wouldn't have been assassinated in 2013, and a military junta doesn't rule Iraq today. Minorities in Iraq would be much better off with him in control today.
After 9/11, many people thought that Saddam Hussein had ties with AQ and thus he must be overthrown. However, efforts to overthrow him and his government did not materialize. What if America did, though? How would Iraq, and the ME region in general, look like today?
The circumstances were different as Libya's actions were pretty justified and probably more than hypothetical one on Iraq.they had worse border conflict with Egypt and it escalated into libyan invasion, just like back in 1973. It is comparing apples to oranges.Ok, it was pretty inevitable after these wrath of god comments of Gaddafi on TV and the original amphibious assault and invasion worked like clockwork.
According to many there was a discussion of invading but VP Powell and his team prevailed over Rumsfeld and his side.
If Bush picks a different VP ??
Powell's flip-flopping is overstated. He was for invading Iraq before he was against it. Powell blamed Secretary of State Cheney for misleading him, but refuses to acknowledge his own support for the war.Maybe, but Bush's second choice for VP was Dick Cheney, the CEO of Halliburton and a former SecDef. Cheney was a strident supporter of Bush 41's (misguided) decision not to march to Baghdad in '91. Even after 9/11, Cheney argued for relaxing sanctions on Iran(!).
With Cheney as VP, we might even get a more relaxed war on terror. Certainly no US overthrow of Gaddhafi in '02.
Afghanistan's closed border was one of the reasons why Osama bin-Laden was captured. A milk truck was discovered driving through a mountain passage into Pakistan, which led to bin-Laden's compound.I think the bigger issue would have been the diversion of assets and focus from the fight in Afghanistan. There’s no way we’d have the relatively stable Afghanistan we have today without the occupation having an uninterrupted supply of forces and material throughout the 2000’s.