What if the 1787 US Constitutional Convention had provided for a sort of back-up to the President, a designated person who would take over on the death or disability of the President?
Succession crisis of 1825 wouldn't have occurred for one thing. That created a year's gap before we set up two things: Elections come when president dies, and head of the Senate becomes temporary chief executive until the new election.What if the 1787 US Constitutional Convention had provided for a sort of back-up to the President, a designated person who would take over on the death or disability of the President?
Well, if some sort of backup president was provided for, I suspect we would see as lot of dead presidents. Rememer, many early presidents were from the south, where dueling was popular--what's to stop a backup president from seeking out an excuse to challenge the sitting president and blow his brains out?
Isn't that the function of the VP? To be a backup president in case of death or illness of the current president and also be the tie-breaking. Vote in the senate
I can't see that being considered. A Vice President would've made sense; could've been dangerous for stable democracy, but made sense. This comes off as a bit too monarchistic, and what's to stop congress from shouting down that will?What then? 12th Amendment at least makes sense in that the President Pro Tempore is only president for at most a year before the new elections kick in.Maybe set up a top secret presidential will where the lawyer of the deceased president announces the chosen successor (who doesn't know until the announcement).
Maybe set up a top secret presidential will where the lawyer of the deceased president announces the chosen successor (who doesn't know until the announcement).