Prologue
“These are the basic Socialist values and principles – individual liberty, equality, citizenship, the diffusion of power, the importance of collective and social action…these principles may not have the satisfying certainty of Marxist analysis, nor may they constitute quite the same stirring call to arms as one based on class warfare. But they are a proper expression of the Socialist opposition to injustice, repression and exploitation, and of the socialist concern for the wealth and value of each socialist concern for the welfare and value of each human being, for social justice and for social harmony”
Future of Socialism, Bryan Gould, 1989.
The party that became so powerful
By sinking foreign boats
Is dreaming up new promises
Because promises win votes
And being resolute in conference
With the ad man's expertise
The majority by their silence
Shall pay for days like these
The right to build communities
Is back behind closed doors
'Tween government and people stands
The right arm of the law
Days Like These, Billy Bragg, 1987
--//--
Prologue
"Since 1983 the various factions of Labour had been in an uneasy alliance.
The Kinnock-Hattersley ticket of the Soft Left and Labour Right seemed to indicate a new direction for Labour away from the bullish ideas of Benn and his gaggle of followers of the 'Hard' Left who mainly believed in complete nationalisation of British industry with the control of said industries firmly in the hands of (Left Wing) Trade Unions, unilateral nuclear disarmament, withdrawing from the EEC (European Economic Community) and in general take Britain into a autarkic Socialist government, they also believed that the Labour Party should be more democratic, but shouldn't modernise with the Thatcherite times. Labour should go back to 1976 when the Alternative Economy System was proposed.
The Soft Left was less coherent and very much all over the place in terms of policy but were unified by a sense of not being like Benn but also not being like the Labour Right, they believed in modernising the party to the Thatcherite times but also not embracing the siren calls of monetarism and also believed in some nationalised industries, as one member put it they wanted to be 'Bennism without Benn', with all the wishy washyness that entailed.
And finally there was the Labour Right, united mainly by the beliefs that Benn was wrong, Monetarism was the way to go and that in general Labour need to adapt to the Thatcherite consensus. Of course no one apart from a select few had any idea what modernisation, adapting to the Thatcherite Conesus and in general how Labour could change to the 1980s. This had been brought into stark fashion by the 1987 General Election in which despite Labour's slick and modern campaign they had difficult to adapt there policies to the changing mood. Something had to give as a result..."
"Divides between the Soft Left and Neil Kinnocks office had been ongoing since 1987, intensifying as Kinnock began turning away from the Soft Left and towards the Right under Hattersley. Criticism towards Kinnock reached a feverish pitch with Prescott's push for Deputy Leader in 1988, partially as a Soft Left criticism of Kinnock's leadership and centralisation of power and partially annoyance from Prescott at being placed in an unfavourable position in the Shadow Cabinet. Meanwhile Benn and Heffer, the stalwarts of Labour's 'Hard' Left campaigned mainly on the idea of making a Labour a 'Socialist' party again, well mainly there definition of Socialism. It was in a Labour Party that was warring within itself that would be the birthplace of Britain's Radical 90s."
"At first glance it was going to be a landslide victory for the dream ticket, in a battle between Kinnock and Benn there was obviously going to be a winner. But for Hattersley things were a bit more precarious.
Whilst Heffer was likely to lose (and, given the failure of the Benn/Heffer ticket to gain Union support, this was likely), Prescott was a more dangerous foe for Hattersley. Gaining support from the Soft Left and the Non-Bennite Left, who were suspicious of the Kinnock Project, they decided to attack the face of Labour's Right in Hattersley as way to show their frustration. This reached a pinnacle in the aftermath of Kinnock's 'Something for Nothing' statement over Unilateral Nuclear Disarmament, as Denzil Davies would resign and the leadership office would be paralysed as it tried to clean up the mess that Kinnock had created.
Kinnock's stubborn refusal for about a month to retract his statement and his limp apology afterwards is considered by many to the first nail in Roy Hattersley's Deputy Leadership's Coffin."
"The 'Something for Nothing' comments were what really turned many of the wavering Soft Left MPs off the 'dream ticket', with many either throwing their support behind Prescott as a way to get back at Kinnock or just not bothering to vote for anyone. The betrayal of one of the core Left Wing beliefs of Unilateral Nuclear Disarmament was what spurred many. I heard that Gould only voted for the leadership and not the deputy leadership, but that's probably hearsay." (A comment from a Labour MP about the 1988 Deputy Leadership campaign)
"Then came yet another remarkable turn of events. In the aftermath of the 'Something for Nothing' comments, the TGWU would end up endorsing the Benn/Prescott ticket. With the endorsement of the TWGU the perceived lagging Prescott campaign would gain a new burst of life..."
"They did fucking what!" (Neil Kinnock's alleged response to Peter Mandelson upon finding out about the TGWU Prescott endorsement)
--//--
The surge of support for Prescott in the aftermath of the TGWU's endorsement sent the leadership office into a spin, with even Peter Mandelson supposedly being 'paralysed with confusion' before he got back into gear. The next several months were incredibly dirty as the leadership office spent their time smearing Prescott in the media and engaging in heavy on the ground action. Whilst Prescott didn't have the leadership resources he did manage to form a grassroots campaign with support from David Blunkett, Clare Short and Joan Ruddock who despite having just leaving the SCG (Socialist Campaign Group) had turned away rather rapidly from Kinnock in the aftermath of his 'Something for Nothing' comments. From June to September the Deputy Leadership would become an increasingly nail-biting battle as computer predications veered wildly over who was going to win, from Hattersley winning by a slim margin to Prescott winning outright.
Finally in October 1988 at the Labour Conference the vote for Deputy Leader would be announced.
Overall Result for the Deputy Leadership Election 1988 (Second Ballot):
Hattersley: 47.4%
Prescott: 52.6%
But this would just be the start of probably one of the most infamous conferences since 1985...
--//--
Kinnock's Speech to Conference, October 7th 1988:
Kinnock had been grumpy throughout the conference period, barely acknowledging his new Deputy Leader John Prescott at all as he goes about his business. Kinnock walks up to the podium and prepares himself to speak to the party...
"It's been five years since I told you We have to win, We must not permit any purpose to be superior for the Labour movement to that purpose...well it seems that purpose has not been fulfilled. Instead of aiming to win and bring about a Britain that will help the poor, the hungry, those that need our help, instead we have squabbled like children. I can no longer lead a party that decides that it would rather hold vanity contests than actually win power..."
It's in that moment that noise ripples through the crowd as they realise what's happening, that this is essentially Kinnock's last speech as leader and that he's essentially resigning.
"I have decided that I have better things to do than deal with a party of children, therefore once it can be arranged I will be resigning as leader"
And in that moment, conference bursts into chaos, the sections of Bennite Left Wingers burst into cheers as Benn tries to resist smirking as Kinnock storms away from the podium. Journalists are rushing through the conference to get to the nearest pay phone. The Shadow Cabinet starts going into various clusters as they talk about what just happened. John Prescott looks mildly horrified at what has just happened and for Kinnock's supporters they are scrambling around in confusion as they wonder, what next?
Future of Socialism, Bryan Gould, 1989.
The party that became so powerful
By sinking foreign boats
Is dreaming up new promises
Because promises win votes
And being resolute in conference
With the ad man's expertise
The majority by their silence
Shall pay for days like these
The right to build communities
Is back behind closed doors
'Tween government and people stands
The right arm of the law
Days Like These, Billy Bragg, 1987
--//--
Prologue
"Since 1983 the various factions of Labour had been in an uneasy alliance.
The Kinnock-Hattersley ticket of the Soft Left and Labour Right seemed to indicate a new direction for Labour away from the bullish ideas of Benn and his gaggle of followers of the 'Hard' Left who mainly believed in complete nationalisation of British industry with the control of said industries firmly in the hands of (Left Wing) Trade Unions, unilateral nuclear disarmament, withdrawing from the EEC (European Economic Community) and in general take Britain into a autarkic Socialist government, they also believed that the Labour Party should be more democratic, but shouldn't modernise with the Thatcherite times. Labour should go back to 1976 when the Alternative Economy System was proposed.
The Soft Left was less coherent and very much all over the place in terms of policy but were unified by a sense of not being like Benn but also not being like the Labour Right, they believed in modernising the party to the Thatcherite times but also not embracing the siren calls of monetarism and also believed in some nationalised industries, as one member put it they wanted to be 'Bennism without Benn', with all the wishy washyness that entailed.
And finally there was the Labour Right, united mainly by the beliefs that Benn was wrong, Monetarism was the way to go and that in general Labour need to adapt to the Thatcherite consensus. Of course no one apart from a select few had any idea what modernisation, adapting to the Thatcherite Conesus and in general how Labour could change to the 1980s. This had been brought into stark fashion by the 1987 General Election in which despite Labour's slick and modern campaign they had difficult to adapt there policies to the changing mood. Something had to give as a result..."
"Divides between the Soft Left and Neil Kinnocks office had been ongoing since 1987, intensifying as Kinnock began turning away from the Soft Left and towards the Right under Hattersley. Criticism towards Kinnock reached a feverish pitch with Prescott's push for Deputy Leader in 1988, partially as a Soft Left criticism of Kinnock's leadership and centralisation of power and partially annoyance from Prescott at being placed in an unfavourable position in the Shadow Cabinet. Meanwhile Benn and Heffer, the stalwarts of Labour's 'Hard' Left campaigned mainly on the idea of making a Labour a 'Socialist' party again, well mainly there definition of Socialism. It was in a Labour Party that was warring within itself that would be the birthplace of Britain's Radical 90s."
"At first glance it was going to be a landslide victory for the dream ticket, in a battle between Kinnock and Benn there was obviously going to be a winner. But for Hattersley things were a bit more precarious.
Whilst Heffer was likely to lose (and, given the failure of the Benn/Heffer ticket to gain Union support, this was likely), Prescott was a more dangerous foe for Hattersley. Gaining support from the Soft Left and the Non-Bennite Left, who were suspicious of the Kinnock Project, they decided to attack the face of Labour's Right in Hattersley as way to show their frustration. This reached a pinnacle in the aftermath of Kinnock's 'Something for Nothing' statement over Unilateral Nuclear Disarmament, as Denzil Davies would resign and the leadership office would be paralysed as it tried to clean up the mess that Kinnock had created.
Kinnock's stubborn refusal for about a month to retract his statement and his limp apology afterwards is considered by many to the first nail in Roy Hattersley's Deputy Leadership's Coffin."
"The 'Something for Nothing' comments were what really turned many of the wavering Soft Left MPs off the 'dream ticket', with many either throwing their support behind Prescott as a way to get back at Kinnock or just not bothering to vote for anyone. The betrayal of one of the core Left Wing beliefs of Unilateral Nuclear Disarmament was what spurred many. I heard that Gould only voted for the leadership and not the deputy leadership, but that's probably hearsay." (A comment from a Labour MP about the 1988 Deputy Leadership campaign)
"Then came yet another remarkable turn of events. In the aftermath of the 'Something for Nothing' comments, the TGWU would end up endorsing the Benn/Prescott ticket. With the endorsement of the TWGU the perceived lagging Prescott campaign would gain a new burst of life..."
"They did fucking what!" (Neil Kinnock's alleged response to Peter Mandelson upon finding out about the TGWU Prescott endorsement)
--//--
The surge of support for Prescott in the aftermath of the TGWU's endorsement sent the leadership office into a spin, with even Peter Mandelson supposedly being 'paralysed with confusion' before he got back into gear. The next several months were incredibly dirty as the leadership office spent their time smearing Prescott in the media and engaging in heavy on the ground action. Whilst Prescott didn't have the leadership resources he did manage to form a grassroots campaign with support from David Blunkett, Clare Short and Joan Ruddock who despite having just leaving the SCG (Socialist Campaign Group) had turned away rather rapidly from Kinnock in the aftermath of his 'Something for Nothing' comments. From June to September the Deputy Leadership would become an increasingly nail-biting battle as computer predications veered wildly over who was going to win, from Hattersley winning by a slim margin to Prescott winning outright.
Finally in October 1988 at the Labour Conference the vote for Deputy Leader would be announced.
Overall Result for the Deputy Leadership Election 1988 (Second Ballot):
Hattersley: 47.4%
Prescott: 52.6%
But this would just be the start of probably one of the most infamous conferences since 1985...
--//--
Kinnock's Speech to Conference, October 7th 1988:
Kinnock had been grumpy throughout the conference period, barely acknowledging his new Deputy Leader John Prescott at all as he goes about his business. Kinnock walks up to the podium and prepares himself to speak to the party...
"It's been five years since I told you We have to win, We must not permit any purpose to be superior for the Labour movement to that purpose...well it seems that purpose has not been fulfilled. Instead of aiming to win and bring about a Britain that will help the poor, the hungry, those that need our help, instead we have squabbled like children. I can no longer lead a party that decides that it would rather hold vanity contests than actually win power..."
It's in that moment that noise ripples through the crowd as they realise what's happening, that this is essentially Kinnock's last speech as leader and that he's essentially resigning.
"I have decided that I have better things to do than deal with a party of children, therefore once it can be arranged I will be resigning as leader"
And in that moment, conference bursts into chaos, the sections of Bennite Left Wingers burst into cheers as Benn tries to resist smirking as Kinnock storms away from the podium. Journalists are rushing through the conference to get to the nearest pay phone. The Shadow Cabinet starts going into various clusters as they talk about what just happened. John Prescott looks mildly horrified at what has just happened and for Kinnock's supporters they are scrambling around in confusion as they wonder, what next?
Last edited: