JJohnson
Banned
Let's say for whatever reason we have the following WW2 scenario:
Germany stabilized after WW1 and got milder treatment, angering France. Germany lost Alsace-Lorraine, but kept Posen-West Prussia. France instead is part of the instigator of WW2; fast forward a few years and France gets defeated, and it loses its colonies, including Vietnam to one of the victorious powers - the UK, Netherlands, Germany, and not the USA. Fast forward a few more years, and the US decides not to intervene in Southeast Asia because the United Kingdom has it well under control.
Without this Vietnam War, what do the baby-boomers do with themselves? Are they still going to experiment with drugs? Find something else to protest? What kind of 60s/70s do we see in the USA without the anti-war movement, and what effects does that have on the Democrats and Republicans?
Germany stabilized after WW1 and got milder treatment, angering France. Germany lost Alsace-Lorraine, but kept Posen-West Prussia. France instead is part of the instigator of WW2; fast forward a few years and France gets defeated, and it loses its colonies, including Vietnam to one of the victorious powers - the UK, Netherlands, Germany, and not the USA. Fast forward a few more years, and the US decides not to intervene in Southeast Asia because the United Kingdom has it well under control.
Without this Vietnam War, what do the baby-boomers do with themselves? Are they still going to experiment with drugs? Find something else to protest? What kind of 60s/70s do we see in the USA without the anti-war movement, and what effects does that have on the Democrats and Republicans?