Yeah that’s why this time it could work, they know what to avoid when making this hypothetical game, specifically mana.Imperator Rome was meant to be this, but it's a gigantic train-wreck.
Yeah that’s why this time it could work, they know what to avoid when making this hypothetical game, specifically mana.Imperator Rome was meant to be this, but it's a gigantic train-wreck.
Actually, it's pretty good now with the 2.0 update. There are still definite problems with it, but you can say the same about basically every Paradox game.Imperator Rome was meant to be this, but it's a gigantic train-wreck.
Any vharacter can be interesting if played well.Anyone know any interesting characters to play as in CK3?
Thanks I'll look into those!Any vharacter can be interesting if played well.
In 867 Rurik and the guy in Jorvik are my favorites as well as other Slavic and Baltic rulers.
In 1066 Harald Hardrada is probably most exciting to play at the beginning of the game.
I'm hoping to play as Novgorod on CK II soon in order to try and unlock the "Norse East" achievement [possible Lost Vikings reference there?] "British Raj" is another CK II achievement I'd like, so I am wondering if it's possible for Asian families to westernise in that game?Any vharacter can be interesting if played well.
In 867 Rurik and the guy in Jorvik are my favorites as well as other Slavic and Baltic rulers.
In 1066 Harald Hardrada is probably most exciting to play at the beginning of the game but Russian rulers are also ok. Like I said even q count in Ireland can be interesting if played well.
In general, yeah. I know Norse are going to be a popular choice anyway, but it's pretty good so far in my limited experience with it.Since the flavour pack, Northern Lords has been released would anyone here recommend it?
I see, I saw that it added the option to abandon one's land and become host and I wanted to know if it was worth it. Thank you!In general, yeah. I know Norse are going to be a popular choice anyway, but it's pretty good so far in my limited experience with it.
Finland is still hardest mode, though.
OK, now that is annoying.Now you need to hold England, Scandinavia and Lower Saxony just to reform Asatru. The whole Holy Site thing is beginning to suck.
I favour Harald Finehair in 867 after binge ~ watching Vikings series 8 [I'm really excited it's getting a sequel!] on Amazon Prime and am looking forward to playing as Russian rulers as well; I'm also told 3% of my maternal DNA may well be either Viking or Russian in origin, which could explain why, if I see an undefended monastery I feel an urge to grab an axe, kill everyone within and steal all the gold. ;-)Any vharacter can be interesting if played well.
In 867 Rurik and the guy in Jorvik are my favorites as well as other Slavic and Baltic rulers.
In 1066 Harald Hardrada is probably most exciting to play at the beginning of the game but Russian rulers are also ok. Like I said even q count in Ireland can be interesting if played well.
I'm intrigued by the Burmese rulers, but that might be because we owned a Burmese cat until April 2019 when he passed away.Anyone know any interesting characters to play as in CK3?
I'd argue differently ~ I enjoy observer mode on Imperator, but what I find frustrating is none of the screenshots I took seem to have been saved.Imperator Rome was meant to be this, but it's a gigantic train-wreck.
The big issue here is that China will blob and eat the map unless you have a strongly upper-bounded realm size limit.What I'd really love would be if they expanded the map all the way to Cambodia, China and Japan this time around, as it gets a bit boring playing as the same rulers in two similar games.
This is something people have been asking for for a long time. It'll be great if they execute the ideas well.So today's dev diary is on the cultural rework. what do people think of this rework?