Fenestella
Banned
Many weakened/declining powers and small pushovers survived amid neighboring powers, many didn't. It seems the philosophy of maintaining/creating a counterbalance/buffer state or the lack thereof shaped the geopolitical realities more than the other way around, but I'm not sure about it.
Some thought experiments may help:
1) X, Y, & Z partitioned and absorbed A
If X, Y, & Z shared the philosophy of maintaining counterbalance/buffer state, would A have survived (partially)?
e.g., X:Russia, Y
russia, Z:Austria, A
oland-Lithuania
2) B survived amid X, Y, & Z
If none of X, Y, & Z bought into the philosophy of maintaining counterbalance/buffer state, would they have partitioned and absorbed B?
e.g., X:British Empire, Y:French Empire, Z:German Empire, B:Low Countries
Some thought experiments may help:
1) X, Y, & Z partitioned and absorbed A
If X, Y, & Z shared the philosophy of maintaining counterbalance/buffer state, would A have survived (partially)?
e.g., X:Russia, Y
2) B survived amid X, Y, & Z
If none of X, Y, & Z bought into the philosophy of maintaining counterbalance/buffer state, would they have partitioned and absorbed B?
e.g., X:British Empire, Y:French Empire, Z:German Empire, B:Low Countries
Last edited: