alternatehistory.com
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
New threadmarks
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Word Count:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
alternatehistory.com
These threads got me thinking....
https://www.alternatehistory.com/forum/threads/wi-triumph-was-not-bought-by-standard.446788/
https://www.alternatehistory.com/fo...riumph-motorcar-company-not-the-bikes.370129/
Instead of British Leyland acquiring Standard-Triumph in 1960, can Triumph remain an independent entity? They’ve just launched the Herald, and they have some very good cars then in development, including the TR4, Spitfire, 1300 and 2000.
In my view the company had way too many models during the 1960s and 1970s,
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triumph_Motor_Company#Post_war
Could Triumph have survived on only three types, TR4, 1300 and 2000? This would mean closing all but one Triumph factory.
Forums
Top