Could the jews, with aid from Parthia, have secured independence face Rome?

Recently, i've been thinking about the Great Jewish Revolt of 66-71 AD, and one idea popped into my head (perhaps the only way for the jews to estabilish a non-ephemeral independent state): a helping hand from the Parthian Empire.
At the time of the revolt, the parthian king-of-kings was Vologases. Prior to 66 AD, Vologases had involved himself in a war against the Roman Empire, in a contest for suzerainty over Armenia -- the war ended in a compromise between both sides, as none of both managed to achieve total victory: the armenian kings would belong to the parthian arsacid dynasty, but their coronation would be superseded by the roman government.
Maybe, if Vologases is defeated in the war and ends up losing Armenia to the romans as a vassal, he'll get a vengeful spirit and decide to declare war on Rome once the jews revolt, in order to get back Armenia, secure free Judea as compliant ally (maybe with a favorable alliance treaty) and capture Damascus? Perhaps the "contested buffer line" of vassal kingdoms between Rome and Parthia gets extended to the Levant?
Bonus question: which jewish revolt do you feel had the most potential to succeed? The '66 Revolt or Bar Kokhba's Revolt?
 
Last edited:
The '66 Revolt.
Bar Kokhba never had a chance, his folowers were starved in their caves more ofen than not.
 
Kicking the Romans out was doable. Keeping them out, however, was a different matter entirely. The economic damage of being cut off from the Mediterranean trading hub would be disastrous enough, but keeping in mind that the Romans could then squeeze them from North and South afterwards makes it even harder to imagine this working.
 
Kicking the Romans out was doable. Keeping them out, however, was a different matter entirely. The economic damage of being cut off from the Mediterranean trading hub would be disastrous enough, but keeping in mind that the Romans could then squeeze them from North and South afterwards makes it even harder to imagine this working.
Could they make up for it with trade from the east?
Especially if Parthia has Damascus.
 
Short answer: No.

Long answer: Parthia was hardly able to contest Roman hegemony anywhere in the near east outside of Mesopotamia in the best of times, and got its ass handed to them in the worst of times. The furthest Parthia could realistically project their power is Armenia, and even that was always tenuous. Propping up and successfully maintaining the existence of a client state in the levant was completely unfeasible unless they also somehow managed to seize Egypt and Syria, which the Parthians are completely incapable of doing after ~60 BCE.
 
Top