So, recently I've been reading up on the late Hellenistic Era/ Late Roman Republic, and as I read, I couldn't help but notice the uncanny number of competent and devastating adversaries Rome faced between 113 B.C. and 13 B.C. the Romans faced:
the Cimbri (Cimbrian War: 113-101) losing 5 battles before Marius took over
Jugurthine War (112-105)
the 2nd Servile War (104-100 B.C.)
the Social War (91-88 B.C.) where civil war broke out in the Italian homeland
the Mithradatic Wars (90-63 B.C.) where they faced arguably their toughest opponent since Hannibal, Mithradates the Great as well as Tigranes the Great
Burebista's Dacian Expansion (82-44 B.C.)
the Sertorian Revolt (80-72 B.C.) in Iberia
the Third Servile War (73-71 B.C.) led by Sparticus
the Gallic Wars led by Vircingetorix (58-50 B.C.)
Caesar's Civil War (49-45 B.C.) with Caesar against Pompey
Liberator's Civil War (43-42 B.C.) with Mark Antony and Octavian against Brutus and Cassius
the Sicilian Revolt (44-36 B.C.)
So, with all of this going on, all of these massive wars, many of which overlapped, is it possible to check Roman power and keep them as a regional power? How would this affect the other parts of the Mediterranean world? Would someone else rise to the power of Rome, or would the status quo remain?