I'm afraid your the one who has not understood this discussion at all. Which achieves greater result: applying your force multipliers where the enemy is strong or where he is weak?
You also seem to be under some delusion that the Germans force multipliers are permanent. They are not. If the Germans do not destroy the great bulk of the French military in the first blow as they did IOTL, then the French will shake off their command lethargy and apply the lessons learned as they did IOTL. But unlike IOTL, they will still have material superiority instead of gross inferiority. Much of the force multipliers the Germans had would hence be lost. The Germans would likely win that battle, yes, but they would do so at the cost of losing the war (or, well, even more so then they did IOTL with their subsequent strategic stupidity). The difference between winning decisively and just winning.
Name the force multipliers. Should be simple. Just follow my posts and rattle them off. There are about fourteen of them I named, which you seem to not have noticed at all. So I am amused that you try to lecture ME about them.
And if you have not figured it out, some force multipliers (terrain and climate for example) are permanent. You have to know how to use them, though.
Last edited: