I & II - Probally
III - The earlier versions of it yeah
IV- No.
That depends.
The basic FT-17 was armed with an 8mm MG, so it had the same chances of any MG of that caliber to take out a tank: the very small probability of hitting a vision slit and killing a crewman, and not even that if the crewmen are using scopes.
But by the time PzIs etc. are around, most if not all units still fielding the FT-17s are either entirely or at least partially outfitted with the Char Canon version, which sports the 37mm infantry gun. With a barrel length of 22 calibers, this has roughly the following chances of piercing the enemy tank's front armor, at 250 meters:
PzI: 60%
PzIIB: 60%
PzIIIE: 50%
PzIVE: 20%
These chances obviously worsen at longer ranges and with the gradual up-armoring of the later models.
So it has (obviously) greated chances of penetration with the flank and rear armour.
Pushing the FT-17 to an extreme. If it was right behind a Tiger Tank could it take it out?
Even at point-blank range with AP shells?
The FT-17, with the SA 18 37mm Gun could penetrate 20mm of armor at 100 meters, 14mm at 500 meters.
PzKpfw I - Max armor was 13mm
PzKpfw II - Max armor, depending on model was 14mm or 20/30mm (excepting the turret TOP).
PzKpfw III - 17mm (top of turret and top of hull) to 30mm/50mm (again depending on model)
PzKpfw IV - 10mm to 30mm/50+30mm
Panther & Tiger - Forget about it.
The thing about the FT-17 is speed. It could move at a blazing FIVE MPH and the turret was manually rotated by the gunner.