If there would be surviving tsarist Russia (constitutional or authotarian) Nazis probably butterfly away, leastly that kind of as in OTL. And for me surviving tsarist Russia even would need pre-1900 POD and this cause some butterflies. There would be even pretty different WW1.
Really? Wouldn't Russia remain a backwards farming state if not for the Soviet Union?Basically, if Stalin managed to beat the Nazis, pretty much anyone else would be able to.
So assuming the Nazis do come to power for whatever reason I would assume that they would, though it would depend on how they survive (by winning WWI or by the Whites winning the civil war). Either way, chances are they would, given the ridiculous extent to which Stalin shot himself in the foot. Surviving Tsarism means probably no purges, which is already a big boon, as well as no gulags and no Ukrainian famine. Basically, if Stalin managed to beat the Nazis, pretty much anyone else would be able to.
Hitler may not invade Russia if its not Bolshevik. The idea that it was a Jew led conspiracy whose ideals were the complete antithesis of his own was a big part behind why the sheer numbers involved could be ignored.
if there had been no Russian revolution would the Nazis have come to power?
Really? Wouldn't Russia remain a backwards farming state if not for the Soviet Union?
Czechoslovakia, Poland, Denmark, Norway, the Low Countries, France, etc., etc., were not Bolshevik and Nazi Germany invaded them nonetheless. In fact there's a decent case to be made that a non-Bolshevik Russia would probably look like 1930s Poland in political terms (possibly in economic terms as well).Hitler may not invade Russia if its not Bolshevik. The idea that it was a Jew led conspiracy whose ideals were the complete antithesis of his own was a big part behind why the sheer numbers involved could be ignored.
Basically what it saids on the tin.
A Tsarist Russia would be more friendly with France, so Hitler may need to fight the two of them at the same time. Also, I don't quite buy the notion that Communism was necessary for Russia to advance beyond the middle ages when it seemed to be performing quite well pre-WWI. How did the Tsarist Russia in the post-WWI period come to be, anyway? A Tsarist restoration by the Whites? No revolution at all?
By quite well you mean being smashed while fighting on its own soil in the Crimean war, getting smashed by an upstart Asian imperial power and getting smashed by a Germany holding off half the world on a completely separate front thousands of miles away?