Could a Jacobite Victory at the Boyne Have Led to a Stuart Ireland?

If James had won a decisive victory at the Battle of the Boyne, could a compromise settlement have been reached where Ireland is spun off as a separate kingdom under the Stuarts, probably with James relinquishing all other claims?
 
Last edited:
Unlikely. Aside from complicating William and Mary's claims to the throne, if James doing a runner constitutes his abdication then why does he get to keep one of the states?, it gives James an independent power base close to England and Scotland and means they're going to have to constantly have one eye constantly over their shoulder in case he should ever try to ally with one of their continental opponents to invade. If William and Mary lose at the Boyne to fully secure their rule then they're simply going to keep coming back as many times as necessary until they win.
 
Unlikely. Aside from complicating William and Mary's claims to the throne, if James doing a runner constitutes his abdication then why does he get to keep one of the states?, it gives James an independent power base close to England and Scotland and means they're going to have to constantly have one eye constantly over their shoulder in case he should ever try to ally with one of their continental opponents to invade. If William and Mary lose at the Boyne to fully secure their rule then they're simply going to keep coming back as many times as necessary until they win.

Good points. I edited the OP to state exactly what I meant originally. However, this leads to a further problem: would James accept such a deal?
 
If James had won a decisive victory at the Battle of the Boyne, could a compromise settlement have been reached where Ireland is spun off as a separate kingdom under the Stuarts, probably with James relinquishing all other claims?

A Jacobite victory would be very hard to arrange. The Jacobite army was smaller than William's and not as well trained or equipped. In fact it wouldn't take much to make it a crushing victory for William, as at one point his forces almost cut off the Jacobite line of retreat. It would have been interesting if James had been captured.
 
In fact it wouldn't take much to make it a crushing victory for William, as at one point his forces almost cut off the Jacobite line of retreat. It would have been interesting if James had been captured.
That could actually be more awkward for William and Mary - they then have to figure out what to do with him, and holding him doesn't finish matters since there's an heir in the person of James Francis Edward over in France. I could easily see James being unofficialy allowed to escape simply to avoid the awkwardness.
 
Top