1- Pretty much what everyone else has already said. Constantine is not responsible for the suppression of paganism within the Empire.
Constantine's monetary policy were closely associated with his religious ones, in that increased minting was associated with measures of confiscation of all the gold, silver and bronze statues from pagan temples
2- You won't find too many arguments from anyone throughout history on that point. Throw in the fact that a guy who came to power by overthrowing 4-man rule in the Empire decided to basically split it up among 5 heirs, and you get the idea that Constantine really didn't know how to handle family.
he knew that division would lead to civil war but he had to give something to the family witch only lead to make his sons arrange the slaughter of most of the rest of the family by the army
thanks god the idiots didnt killed justinian
3- It had been a century since political power was focused in the west. Alexander Severus spent a good chunk of his reign in Rome, but then you had a century of barracks Emperors ruling from the Danube and Rhine and the Persian frontier. Then, the Tetrarchy was basically governed from Nicomedia, which is not exactly far from Constantinople.
yes but i was talking about prestige and political power
rome was still considered by the romans to be their motherland and the creation of constantinople probably only weakened the ideia that rome was the center of the world
and the creation of a new senate in constantinople and putting the new senate with has much power has the old one made rome losse the political value that had since a new emperor could be declared in constantinople so rome only lost the advantage that had since all emperors had been declared soo by the roman senate