AFAIK, nobody else took them. It'd be interesting to see Lombardy in Germany, or Austria.Diamond said:Didn't we have more people than that? Come on guys...
Question: Would anyone mind if I took on the Lombards after all? Nobody else claimed them, right?
How 'bout we wait on mucking around with religion (and prompting schisms with traditionalists like me) till we're a bit further into the TL?cow defender said:i don't see what their problem was the arians weren't all that different. here let me quote:
"Arius taught that Jesus was like God, but not fully the same as God, because God had neither a beginning nor an end, but there was a time when Jesus the Son did not exist. This, in Arius’ eyes meant that Jesus was essentially different than God the Father, though also essentially different than humans. Arius taught that Jesus was the perfect image of God (while humans are imperfect images of God)."
maybe if we stress at the same time jesus' divinity as well as his humanity both sides can be helped. it seems today most only stress his divinity...or am i wrong.
Matt Quinn said:But religious developments will likely have an effect on the development of the Gothic state(s) and that'll in turn affect our scenario, even in its broadest outlines (who wars with whom and who wins). Some of it at least needs to be hashed out in advance.
Focus on the Franks man. Let the other guys decide what the Goths are gonna do.Justin Green said:Okay I read up and here is my Idea. OTL Alaric II was peaceful guy who was trying to gain the good will of his catholic subjects. He had a treaty with Clovis I of the franks and he was content to remain at peace. Eventually Clovis however wanted to gain more land and loot. Despite Theodric (Ostrogoths ruler who was Alaric father in law) attempt at keeping the Visigoths and Franks from war, they eventually did ending with the Frankish victory at the Campus Vogladensis, near Poitiers, where Clovis is said to have personally killed Alaric in combat.
What we do is this. Theodric succedes. Franks stay at peace with the Visigoths(Perhaps a minor land concession. I got to get something from the deal.) and instead go to war with the Burgundians( this would end up happening in the 520's Otl). The fact the Burgundians are Arians will be good enough reason for war(it was the stated reason for war with the Visigoths).
So to Sum it up. Theodric in Italy trying to bring Arianism more into line with the Catholic Church. War is averted beteen Visigoths and Franks after Alaric agrees to support Theodric attempt at bring the Arians more into line with the Catholic Church. The Frankish hordes go to war with the Burgundians for being filthy Heretics, and are defeated spectacuarly.
And perhaps the Saxons in Britain and Germany start raiding the franks land. Franks go to england and with the support of the local catholic populace(Saxons where arian) the Saxon in england are dealt a fatal blow.
It needs fleshing out and dates but hows that sound.
I think at this point, the Burgundians were very distinguishable from the Franks.Diamond said:Justin:
I think the Franks invading Burgundian lands instead of Hispania is a good idea (does anyone have the Burgundians?). If they are successful it will put more hostile forces between Visis and Ostros, which will almost force V and O to cooperate at some point in the future to stop the possibility of Frankia expanding to the Med and cutting off overland trade routes between Hispania and Italy.
If all Theoderic is required to do is act as moderator between Clovis and Alaric, I'm all for it. I won't be sending troops to help anyone though.![]()
Err, that was supposed to be weren't very distinguishable.DominusNovus said:I think at this point, the Burgundians were very distinguishable from the Franks.
Justin Green said:*kick*
What happened to all the people?
Forgot to sum up the Lombards: Basically, they'll stay put territorially, and strengthen relations with both the Ostrogoths and Byzantines (trying to hedge their betscow defender said:so have we all put in our first 50 years?