Combining Soviet and NATO Military and Aerospace Technology?

Delta Force

Banned
During the Cold War, the Soviet Union and NATO were better in different areas of technology. For example, Soviet tanks had more powerful armaments, anti-tank missiles, explosive reactive armor, and active defense systems, while NATO tanks had better fire control, armor, and defensive design (blow-out panels, heavily protected ammunition, etc.). This was also the case in areas such as aerospace, where the Soviets had technologies that allowed for a high degree of automation, better space station technology, as well as spacecraft that received power from nuclear reactors, while NATO nations had better technology for operations beyond low Earth orbit, more developed solid rocket technology, and more advanced launch systems such as nuclear thermal rockets (never used as a flight item) and semi-reusable space shuttles (of course, the Soviets eventually made one of their own).

What if some of these technologies were incorporated together? This could be anything from a neutral state incorporating some technologies from both blocs on purchased goods (for example, Western electronics on Soviet tanks), or even higher level cooperation due to significantly improved relations.
 
Significantly improved relations means a small fraction of the government R & D spending for space and military matters.

Any country trying to have good relations with both sides won't be let in on the tech of either side.

Much like WW2 Germans were far ahead in rocketry and chemical weapons development while other nations were ahead in other areas it's the nature of any major wars be they of the hot or cold variety.
 

Delta Force

Banned
Any country trying to have good relations with both sides won't be let in on the tech of either side.

India and Baathist Iraq were somewhat able to do so, as well as Yugoslavia.

So basically what happened after the fall of the USSR? I mean that is roughly what happened afterwards.

Yes, but with a surviving Soviet Union. So it could be that detente goes further, or the two superpowers getting along better following the end of the Cold War in the late 1980s. There was a period before the collapse of the Soviet Union where it was thought that the Soviet Union and United States would work together as friendly rivals.
 
India and Baathist Iraq were somewhat able to do so, as well as Yugoslavia.



Yes, but with a surviving Soviet Union. So it could be that detente goes further, or the two superpowers getting along better following the end of the Cold War in the late 1980s. There was a period before the collapse of the Soviet Union where it was thought that the Soviet Union and United States would work together as friendly rivals.
Okay I get what you're saying.

I think the best place to start would be Ronald Reagan dying from the assassination and Bush taking on a much more peaceful and cooperative approach to US-Soviet relations.

The next route would be Gorbachev's policies resulting in a modern China like USSR. One that practices state run capitalism and opens up to having elections to some degrees. Essentially his policies work and liberalize the USSR without breaking it up.

So you combine a less aggressive US foreign Policy stance and a Russian Premier that works to make relations better and liberalize the country.

I'm picturing a 1990's with the federation replaced with the Soviet Union.

Now the next step would probably be to break up the empire by demand of Moscow and a planned European Union with influence from a friendly US and USSR. I actually think that this would be surprisingly easy to imagine and probably have a slightly better outcome then OT, especially if Bush and Gorbachev decide to seriously get rid of their nations arsenals.
 
... And India is now flying Russian fighter jets with homemade avionics... Which is Western avionics by any other name...
 
Top