Although my intent was to cover all of Asia first, it has become clear that an update on the Rhomaic Empire will be necessary before moving elsewhere. In the early 11th century under Emperor Basileus, the Empire is the uncontested hegemon, with the Eastern Mediterranean Sea effectively the Rhomaic Mare Nostrum. Possessions in the west include Sicily, Calabria, Apulia and a few holdouts in Campania; the Balkanic Limes are on the Lower Danube, with Croatia being a Rhomaic vassal. The Empire commands the entirety of Anatolia and the Levant; other positions include the southern coast of Taurica (1), Cyrenaica and Alexandria. The headache with Egypt had been solved by installing a tributary kingdom, with a hierocratic organization of the society.
Coptic nationalism has thus been neutralized; issues in Syria were solved by devolution of the whole Empire, to allow for more flexibility and effective use of resources.
The 11th century emperors have not concluded any major military campaigns; the sole exception being the conquest of Palmyra in the 1020s. The emperors thus focused on consolidating and strengthening the empire from within, also attempting to fully integrate the Levant.
The reign of Michael IV Paphlagonian (1034-1041) saw internal unrest, namely revolts in Antioch, Nicopolis and Bulgaria (aided by the Pechenegs). All of these revolts were crushed.
He was briefly succeeded by Michael V. Kalaphates, subsequently by Constantine IX Monomachos (1042-1055). He had to deal with a Russian attack, which was dealt with with Greek fire.
Constantine IX had attempted to enforce a union upon both the Armenian and Syriac Jacobite Churches. The Armenians reacted with hostility, and this was also the reason why they collaborated with the Seljuqs (2) readily later on.
One of the biggest issues in terms of Church politics was native to the region of Syria (3). The area has been in Rhomaic hands for like almost a century, yet there are still three people claiming to be the Patriarch of Antioch (although only one of them actually sits in Antioch). We have the Syriac Jacobite Church, a schismatic (4) organization, following Monophysite Christology (5). This Church is viewed as a Syriac national church, with faithful among the Arabs also outside the Rhomaic borders. The existence of this church appears to be an expression of local calls for autonomy, as well as a different mentality of the Afro-Asiatic (6) peoples in contrast to the Indo-European (7) mentality and interpretation of the message of Christ.
Maronite monks and pilgrims
Then there is the Maronite Church on the Phoenician coast. This Church officially embraces a monothelite Christological position, although the Phoenician merchants don’t appear to be fierce zealots ready to fight for such theological nuances. They are practical people. Reasonable if you wish.
So in 1054 Constantine proposes a solution of the issue. The plan is, that each of the incumbent Patriarchs are allowed to stay in office until they are there. Once they depart this world, they are not to have a successor, but rather the remaining Patriarchs are to lead their congregation. Upon the vacancy of all three Patriarchal thrones, a fully legitimate and undisputed Patriarch of Antioch oiught to be selected.
Such a plan sounds nice on paper, but failed to reflect the
raison d´etre of the Jacobite and Maronite Churches. For many Aramaic-speaking people, the existence of a national church was an expression of ethnic identity and helped to keep their culture alive vis-à-vis the Hellenization process, which has almost entirely wiped out any remaining native languages of Anatolia.
The problem was thus left unresolved to deal for the following Doukas dynasty. The first Doukid Emperor, Constantine X, was an open supporter of the bureaucratic faction of the Rhomaic court (8).
Seeking to prevent a strong military from causing trouble, or even worse regional revolts, many regiments were disbanded. The Diocesan Councils and their decisions were controlled and monitored more closely, to such extent, that their decision-making and articulation of interest capacities were reduced to minimum. This was especially true in the regions north of the Taurus Mountains (9); to the south of this mountain range, the complaints and wishes of the Councils were taken into consideration and thus they continued to have at least some weight.
Seeing inaction and reluctance from the side of the Syriac Jacobite Church, Constantine sought at least to strike a deal with the Maronites. After all they were ready for theological compromises…The Emperor was ready to reach out and he proposed an
Ausgleich. The Maronite Church would be subordinated to the Melkite Patriarch of Antioch, yet be recognized as a distinct community. The Maronites were to be granted a degree of autocephaly; the Maronite Patriarch would stop using the title Patriarch of Antioch, and assume a more humble title as the
Catholicos of Boutron and Phoenicia. After all, such a status was not novel to the Patriarchate of Antioch: there was already the Catholicosate of Mtskheta for Kartvelia, the Catholicosate of Irenoupolis for Mesopotamia and the Catholicosate of Romagyris for Central Asia. All of these lay outside the imperial borders. However, the Church of Cyprus, with Rhomaic borders, was already autocephalous, so it was not
that unusual.
The religions of the Empire
The emperor congratulated himself. At least some progress. Now let us leave the integration of the troublesome Syriacs to our successor...
His successor was Romanes IV Diogenes and in a manner, he did solve the Syrian question, although not by a means he or any Rhomaic emperor would be proud of. Wait, is it correct to attribute the defeat at Hierapolis (10) to him? Shouldn’t it be rather the victorious Seljuq Alp Arslan? Anyhow, in the aftermath, the effects were such that the Rhomaic Empire lost the entire Levant to the Seljuqs.
The chaos that followed was not as destructive as it could be, as the Taurus-Euphrates border remained heavily fortified, and the heart of the realm was protected. Egypt was however not counted into the heart of the realm, nor into the empire itself proper. Egypt was a tributary, ruled by a puppet king, run by Coptic clergy and state bureaucracy. Its resources were collected at Alexandria before being shipped to Constantinople. For over a century, this system allowed the Rhomaic Empire to extract as many resources from the country as possible, without needing to administer the country directly.
Although the whole system was designed to prevent any independent decision-making, the weak Doukid dynasty, the defeat at Hierapolis and the Seljuq conquests have given Egypt the needed momentum to act.
The Tmonian dynasty was deposed in a coup in 1075 by Yaraklas of Sioot, captain of the southern garrisons. Yaraklas declared that is time for the Coptic nation to wake up and stand proud, stop toiling for the Rhomaic masters and kick them out. Many bishops agreed with him, with the Coptic Pope welcoming him in Kashromi, the Egyptian capital.
The natural target of Yaraklas´s campaign was Alexandria, a symbol of the much hated Rhomaic yoke. The city was not viewed as Egyptian, for its inhabitants were mainly Alexandrian Greeks. They knew the Empire has no capacity to protect the city and that it would pass out of the hands of the Empire nevertheless. However, they were already so rooted to then city that they did not consider leaving. The urban prefect had all symbols of Rhomaic rule torn down and sent an embassy to Yaraklas, while he was still in Kashromi, declaring “The Humble Submission of the Magistrate of the Great City of Alexandria to His Majesty the Mighty Pharaoh of Kemet”.
The declining empire was saved by the ascension of Alexios Komnenos (11) in 1081 (reigning until 1118). Having to deal with Paulician rebellion in Thrace which he supressed, he also faced raids from the Pechenegs to the north, whom he also defeated.
Alexios Komnenos
However, his main aim was a Levantine Reconquista. The Seljuqs were now quarrelling among themselves, and Alexios sought to reconquer the northwestern parts of Syria. The brisk first campaign was to secure the city of Antioch. Subsequently, one of his generals set foot along the coast, seizing Laodikia (12), Tortosa (13) and Tripoli. The other went Orontes up-stream, seizing Apamea, Hamath and Emessa. Ultimately, an eastward attack followed, seizing Beroia (14), and all the lands until the Euphrates.
The Empire did not lose that much, after all...
(1) Crimea
(2) Yes Turks and Armenians were able to reach an agreement and come to terms. Difficult to imagine, I know
(3) The Great Schism of 1054 does not happen, due to the fact that there is no Norman conquest of Mezzogiorno, resulting in no Latinization of the local Greek churches. Of course, smaller liturgical and theological differences are still present, such as
filioque, or the use of unleavened bread, but these minor issues would not be turned into a big fuss resulting in mutual excommunication of the Ecumenical Patriarch and the Pope. Furthermore, you would still have the Melkite Patriarch of Antioch, and also the Patriarch of Jerusalem to be an arbiter in the case of dispute. I am not mentioning the Melkite Patriarch of Alexandria, as his church is rather small, and is fully dependent on support from Constantinople.
(4) At least so perceived in Constantinople
(5) In communion with the Copts and Armenians
(6) The Copts and the Semitic peoples, such as Syriacs and Arabs, belong to the Afro-Asiatic linguistic family
(7) Or perhaps more narrowly, Greco-Roman
(8) As examined by
@John7755 يوحنا , the Rhomaic Empire had three major faction: First of all, bureaucratic centralists. Oppposed to local autonomy, strong military etc. Secondly, militaristic centralists. And thirdly, local magnates, the sole force of dencentralisation. In Dunes of the Desert, much of this remains true, although the Dioceses remain a place of decentralisation (mainly created to solve the problems in Syria)
(9) The Taurus Mountains were in fact an important political divide in the empire. To the northwest, you have Anatolia, Greece and the Balkans: areas all naturally gravitating to Constantinople. All its people are either Greek, or Vlachs, occasionally barbarians (Slavs and Albanians) looking up to Greek culture. From the religious point of view, almost everyone is Orthodox, apart from a handful of Paulician heretics… To the south of the Taurus, you have a region where trouble begins. You have a few Chalcedonian Christians, who are called Melkites. Most of them are Antiochian Greeks, although there are Aramaic-speaking people who follow the True Faith. Then you have the sturdy Aramaic-speaking Monphysites inhabiting the inlands, before they start speaking Arabic at the edges of the desert. The enmity between Monophysites and Melkites is not the only one in the region. You have also Samaritans and Jews, Maronites, and a few Bardaisanites here and there… enough to cause trouble
(10)Manbij, Aleppo Province, Syria
(11)Byzantine resources are even stronger due to the fact that there is no Norman threat from the west. The Italian Mezzogiorno is still held by Lombard dukes.
(12)Lattakia
(13)Tartus
(14)Aleppo