Status
Not open for further replies.
Can we get some more info on what is happening in Southeast Asia? We have not heard from Deutsche Kambodia in a while, and I have heard that Ludwig II of Bavaria, the cousin of the current colonial governor there and the "Mad King" of Neuschwanstein fame, took interest in Oriental influences for his many castles. Also, some info on colonial India would be interesting. Is Russia's turn towards the east causing an intensified Great Game there?

Interesting! The throne room at Neuschwanstein looks like something from a Byzantine palace, so I know Ludwig II poked around for other ideas. We're going to get a lot of SE Asian content as relates to Tonkin, where French-Chinese tensions are spiking, but Deutsche Kambodia and Siam are just moving along with internal improvements and stability with the German protectorate and friendship in place. Nothing too interesting there for now, until foreign eyes land on the Lao Highlands.

I haven't found too much interesting OTL events/persons from early 1880s India to use and I don't think British policy would have changed too much internally, the big butterflies are more containing France since they have the 800-pound cannon aimed straight at India with the Suez Canal. Russia's expansion at this time started to aim away from Afghanistan and more towards Turkestan/Persia, which of course Britain will have something to say about too... plus we've got a potential alt-Panjeh ahead of us in the 1885/86 timeframe as the borders of Afghanistan get a little murky
 
The Passing of the Torch: Gladstone's Retirement at 100
"...it would not be the Grand Old Man, the Moses of liberalism who led his followers to the brink of triumph but never was able to enter the promised land of 10 Downing Street himself, without a great, thunderous speech, and his address announcing his retirement from the Commons in April of 1882 - timed to coincide with the furious ongoing debates about twin crises in Ireland and Egypt [1] - belongs in the same stratosphere as some of his other great addresses. Perhaps more importantly, 1882 serves as a critical fulcrum for the Liberals, then in the early part of their forty-year domination of British politics with only the brief minority Tory interregnum in the late 1880s as a pause [2]. It came at the end of Gladstone's celebrated 50 year career in the Commons, as a powerful Chancellor of the Exchequer and polarising opposition leader who nevertheless mainstreamed the Liberal ideals and set the stage for their coming hegemony. It also marked when the turn came from the old Liberals, the Peelites and Whigs and smattering of Radicals, a party more of men such as Lord Hartington, the Prime Minister of the time (even though that title would not be used until the early 1900s) than of John Bright [3]. But with the rise of the modern party machinery in the National Liberal Federation came a new generation of ambitious reformers and the Radicals were ascendant, most prominently Joseph Chamberlain and his most loyal friend, Sir Charles Dilke.

1882 then marks a passing of the torch - it came on the heels of Hartington passing his last great reform, the Local Government Board Act of 1881 [4], before the last three-plus years of his ministry descended into lurching from one argument to another not only between Liberal and Tory but between the Whig and Radical wings of the party itself. It was a generationl change, away from the age of contemporaries like Palmerston and Granville, and so it was not Hartington, despite the high regard historians hold for him, who was the successor of Gladstone but instead the ambitious Chamberlain, still President of the Board of Trade at this time, who was the Joshua to Gladstone's Moses, the man who would soon deliver them to their Promised Land [5]..."


- The Passing of the Torch: Gladstone's Retirement at 100 (The Economist, 1982)

[1] Coming soon!
[2] Nod to @Curtain Jerker - How the Tories briefly have their dead cat bounce will be outlined over the next three years of content, fear not!
[3] Mea culpa on not doing my research, btw - I've implied Bright was a strong Home Rule supporter in previous entries and he was most certainly not. If anything he was Gladstone's most aggressive opponent on the issue to stay and not bolt for the Liberal Unionists
[4] Here simply delayed 10 years
[5] Flash-forward (won't say how long) but yes, this does mean what it implies: Prime Minister Joseph Chamberlain
 
20 Years from POD
With that we're basically (more or less) at the 20 year mark out from the POD, by hitting spring of 1882 in the narrative, and appropriately the next entry will take us back to Mexico for the revolt of the caudillos.

For a recap of the last 20 years in this alternate universe...

  • Mexico's Second Empire survives under Max and the space bats smile upon him by making his probably-barren in OTL wife Carlota grant him three children, one of whom nearly had half his face blown off by anti-monarchist assassins leaving his first communion and now wears an eyepatch
  • The Confederacy wins as a result of the French intervention in Mexico succeeding, with a victory in 1862 leaving them in decent shape. This is of course squandered by virtue of it enjoying the antebellum South's famously technocratic and forward thinking leadership class, with a decade-long depression, minimal foreign investment past the early 1870s, and Nathan B. Forrest getting tons of Confederate soldiers killed on an ill-fated trip to Cuba (where he himself dies!). This is followed by an ugly election where the Confederate Supreme Court basically rigs the result in favor of Forrest's Sec of State, Isham Harris
  • France loses the Franco-Prussian War, triggered in 1867 over the Luxembourg Crisis, but much less decisively and despite an attempted Commune the Empire survives and indeed strengthens under the near-dictatorship of Francois Bazaine. When Napoleon III dies, his ambitious young son Napoleon IV takes over and French expansionism - controlling Suez, funding the Ottomans, minor protectorate over Korea - makes them a challenger to Britain
  • Britain, speaking of which, spent a whole decade sitting on its ass under navel-gazing Tory aristocrats and the social cohesion of the country is considerably lower, with more trade union radicalism and reactionary politics in response. Prince Alfred being capped in Sydney in 1868 by a Fenian probably didn't help, and the future OTL Edward VII dying of typhus with the Dutch king doesn't either
  • The Dutch King was only king because his dad had his throat ripped out by a hunting dog
  • The Republicans in the US emancipate the slaves but collapse shortly thereafter thanks to triggering a Great Depression and various corruption scandals; patronage and corruption are much more salient subjects ITTL USA, helping give rise to the Liberal Party as an opposition to the Democrats
  • Russia gets beaten pretty soundly by the Ottomans and has retreated from European affairs for now; Alexander III was not assassinated in 1881
  • Wilhelm I of Germany was assassinated in 1878 and his grandson the Crown Prince drowns in 1880, leaving Friedrich III on the throne in a quickly-destabilizing blood feud with Bismarck and Prince Heinrich his heir apparent
  • Spain has Leopold I of Hohenzollern on the throne, is doing pretty well compared to OTL, and slapped around the Confederates and Carlists alike when it came to Cuba and their civil wars
  • Germany has a Cambodian colony
  • Chile won the Saltpeter War quicker and more decisively than OTL, ironically gaining less territory though, and now appears to be a rising hegemon in the Pacific
  • Britain has a Hawaiian colony
  • Britain also got slapped around by a Boer-native African alliance and are confined to the Cape and Natal, but now have a protectorate over Madagascar to console themselves
Thank you all for reading! Please leave any thoughts, comments, predictions or criticisms, I love to hear from my readers.
 
Maximilian of Mexico
"...like so many wars, there wasn't just one cause, but multiple. The caudillos were for the most part not Zocalistas - indeed, even those least reconciled to the edicts from Mexico City curbing their powers that eventually led to the revolts thought the anti-monarchists to be an odd grab-bag of unreconstructed Lerdists, socialists, indigenous agitators, and irritable unemployed. Their grievances were generally ones of personal pique and power rather than ideological, and yet the eruption occurred against the backdrop of ever-further resentment against the crown in Mexico's poorer provinces. The final straw for many of the personalists with their fiefdoms came with two laws, both of which were passed in late 1881 to codify and simplify governance practices into a constitutional system rather than the ad hoc approach taken for nearly 20 years. The first law finally ended the old system of appointment of "jefes" in the departments, with appointed governors, who would serve six year terms, with unlimited renewals if approved by the Assembly and Emperor. The law, promulgated by Zuloaga and passed with supermajorities in the Assembly, was meant to appease three constituencies: the Assembly, which desired more to than act as a mere sinecure rubberstamp for Maximilian; for the governors, in protecting them from serving purely at the whim of the Emperor and for Maximilian himself, in ending the informal balancing act of Vidaurrismo that had clearly outlived its master and formalize how the departments were run. For some governors, most prominently Manuel Gonzalez, this arrangement suited them fine; others knew that this meant that Maximilian's allies would soon be replacing them and their carefully-cultivated networks of caciques and patronage. Antonio Ochoa in Batopilas was the most resistant to this when he learned that when the new gubernatorial terms - staggered randomly over six years but all to begin when the law went into effect on May 10, 1882 - he would be replaced by Donato Guerra, a longstanding ally of Miguel Miramon. Angel Trias was announced as the new governor for Chihuahua soon thereafter, tapped specifically to develop the department now that Mexico had its second rail connection to the Confederacy, via Los Pasos [1]. Infighting between the presumptive new governor of Oaxaca, Ignacio Mariscal, and the soon-to-be jobless Matias Romero, an old Lerdista who was the weakest of all the reconciliadios in his connection to Chapultepec, began even in the winter.

It was another law that really angered even the "caudillos informales" - the local leaders who held no official office, such as the Native Cajeme who enforced the rule of Jesus Garcia Morales in Sonora or G. Casaventes in Chihuahua - where Zuloaga, in an effort to end the turf war between governors and the Rurales, passed the Law of Jurisdiction through the Assembly with Maximilian's reluctant assent. The law was to create a two-tiered system of courts, modelled on the USA and CSA judiciaries, with "departmental courts" controlled by governors (and practically speaking the caciques) and "national courts" controlled by Mexico City. What outraged the caudillos was the provision that moved all cases either brought by - or, considering the outrages of the day, against - members of the Rurales were to be tried in national rather than local courts. Seeing as how many Rurales commanders often treated local departments as their own fiefdoms contravening the caudillos, and that many parts of Mexico could not afford their own constables and so relied on the Rurales, it effectively nationalized criminal law enforcement. Local "comisario" militias spread across much of the north and south and Manuel Lozada declared that he would shoot every Rurale in Nayarit if the law was not repealed. Despite Maximilian's pleading not to make an example of the Tiger of Tepic, Zuloaga and Miramon agreed for once that Lozada's threat meant open rebellion, and announced that Ramon Corona, a well-regarded general and native of Tepic, would be the new governor. Corona was dispatched with a force of 5,000 men to help secure his inauguration, and Mexico was teetering perilously close to the militarist politics that had marked the years before the French intervention.

Lozada responded by raising a force of 16,000 men, which stunned Mexico City. "Where did he find them all?" Maximilian was said to have asked, bewildered, in a strategy meeting with Miramon. The two armies met at Chapalilla on May 5 [2], where despite a gallant stand Corona's forces were driven back, outnumbered, though their professionalism against Lozada's ragtag band allowed them to inflict disproportionate casualties. Maximilian declared Nayarit a department in revolt and mobilized the Imperial Army in its entirety. Alarmed, the caudillos across the northern departments raised their own forces and fighting between Rurales and Comisarios accelerated throughout May. Mexico was a tinderbox of tension as new governors were dispatched northwards with small forces to secure their own departmental capitals, and the match was lit when on May 22 "the Zocalo Manifesto" was published by a number of dissidents in northern newspapers, calling for republican revolution and the overthrow of the monarchy.

The Revolt of the Caudillos had begun."

- Maximilian of Mexico


[1] ITTL name for El Paso, TX and Paso del Norte, Mexico
[2] ;)
 
From what is implied, the centralists are going to win this war. Hopefully, this event will be the wake-up call necessary to get Max to stop taking victory laps in Europe and Mexico City, and invest more in the impoverished outer provinces.
 
The Revolt of the Caudillos
"...the monarchists had two overwhelming advantages - the first, the Navy, which by 1882 included the ironclads Aguila and Estrella in addition to the decade-old screw steamers, of which there were seven, and an assortment of coastal patrol boats and monitors. There was almost certainly not going to be any foreign support for the rebels and the ability to dominate Mexico's ports - most critically Guaymas, in rebellious Sonora and Veracruz and Coatzoalcos, the country's harbors to Europe - was a key factor in Mexico City's strategy. The other key benefit that Maximilian's forces enjoyed as anti-centralist caudillos took up arms and declared a revolt was logistical. In the fifteen years since putting down Porfirio Diaz's insurgency in the last northern rebellion, "el Norte" was now tied to the Altiplano (now known as the Bajia industrial region, the beating heart of modern Mexico) via the Central Mexican Railroad that was completed all the way to Paso del Norte in 1881 and which had already connected to Matamoros on the mouth of the Rio Grande via the Eastern Mexican Railroad, and connections to Laredo - which actually enjoyed a rail connection to the Texas Gulf Coast - would be completed the next year. Via interchanges at the sleepy cotton farming village at Torreon and the town of Saltillo, the army could be rapidly moved to restive departments such as Chihuahua, Batopilas, Matamoros and Tamaulipas. The Mexican Imperial Army had a standing force of 40,000 professional soldiers who were nearly as well paid as European standing armies and had a further 50,000 reservists who could be called to action and mobilized within 45 days, according to the estimates provided by Miguel Miramon. The Guardia Rural at this point had a complement of about 9,000 men who could serve as an irregular, paramilitary auxiliary and were already in the departments - however, a surprisingly substantial number of Rurales defected to local caudillos despite their long-running feuds with vigilante Comisario militias that were raised in the preceding six months. Maximilian decided early that the Army, not the thinly-spread and unreliable Rurales, would be the thrust of his response to the rebellious provincial chiefs.

Other advantages were less tangible but no less real. The rebellion, as it burst into being in the spring days, had no single leader. It was motivated by personal pique about being replaced by a new governor or losing out on patronage among certain appointed "jefes", such as Antonio Ochoa, Luis Terrazas or Matias Romero; opaque desire to rebel once the ball was rolling, such as the strange Sonoran alliance of ironfisted caudillo Jesus Garcia Morales and his former enemy, the Yaqui Indian leader Cajeme; an escalation of the long running caste war, which brought the Mayan leader Crescencio Poot and his forces out of the jungles of the Yucatan; or ambitions to impose a new government on Mexico, either with himself in charge, as in the case of Nayarit's "el Tigre de Tepic" Manuel Lozada or merely to force a constitutional settlement and drive certain rivals out of power, such as the famously "reluctant rebel," Manuel Gonzales of Matamoros. These competing interests collided frequently, particularly in the early months of the civil war when much time, blood, and treasure was expended on trying to seize Nuevo Leon and Mapimi after the initial invasion of Huejuquila [1] was a quick success.

The more critical problem for Maximilian was that the revolt was not just in the long-restive north but in Oaxaca as well, and Romero's forces moved rapidly to attack and seize the Tehuantepec Railway, the prized infrastructural asset of Mexico. Immediately, his adopted sun Salvador de Iturbide, the Admiral of the Mexican Navy, deployed vessels to the two harbors on either side with small detachments of the then-nascent Mexican Marines to seize the ports. As reservists were called up, and volunteers emerged from across the country for both sides - peasant farmers who resented the Rurales answering the siren song of the rebels, many of whom were veterans or the sons of veterans of the Reform War and French Intervention; immigrants from Europe, China and the Confederacy generally leaving their farms and factories to join hastily-thrown together "patriots brigades" that were generally used for city defense as banditry surged in the chaotic countryside - the Tigre de Tepic aggressively moved into the Rio Grande de Santiago after leaving some forces behind to guard Tepic from a coastal assault, hoping to quickly move on Guadalajara and deal a critical blow to the government's morale..."


- The Revolt of the Caudillos

[1] As always, I am using the Second Empire's territorial divisions.
 
Hartington: Britain's First Modern Prime Minister
"...the events of the spring of 1882 both spoke to Hartington's skill as a short-term tactician and his shortcomings as a long-term strategist. With the Urabi Revolt exploding in Egypt - news arrived of columns of Egyptian soldiers marching on Alexandria, home to the European expatriate community of the country, demanding the resignations of the European ministers who ran the government on Tewfik Pasha's behalf - and the tenancy crisis showing no sign of abating, Hartington took the temperature of his Cabinet. It was Chamberlain who suggested a way out, which gave Hartington tremendous pause, though he knew much like the ambitious President of the Board of Trade that keeping so many thousands of Irishmen in the gaols was not a long term solution. Despite protestations from more Whiggish MPs such as Harcourt and Granville, and encouragement from true radicals such as Lord Ripon [1] at the India Office to go even further on reform, the Prime Minister eventually relented and conceded to allowing Chamberlain and Bright to take the lead on finding a solution to the "Irish Question" with the attention of Europe falling upon Egypt. Undercutting Forster in Dublin, Chamberlain used MP William O'Shea as a go-between with Parnell, with the Irish dissident already having been in correspondence with O'Shea's wife. In April, then, an agreement was formulated - the government would need to settle the rent-arrears issue on terms favorable to Ireland and release Parnell, and he would quell the rebellion. Chamberlain knew that this was a nonstarter for the Cabinet, effectively having Whitehall have policy dictated to it by Irish nationalists. Instead, he proposed a broader reform to Hartington - the Land Act of 1882, a genuine land reform applying to all of Britain, which would have the benefit of appeasing the party's influential Scottish base by ending the highland clearances entirely. Suggestions to package further borough redistribution and electoral reform into the package was dismissed as too radical, but Hartington saw the appeal in creating a Land Board with a Cabinet-level minister to chair it and rewarded the Radicals growing in influence in the party [2].

On May 3, Hartington announced to the Commons the bill, neglecting to mention Parnell's role in shaping it, or Chamberlain's for that matter. As debate in the Commons began in earnest - the Liberals were nearly unanimously for, as was the Irish Parliamentary Party, giving them a substantial majority over the Tories, who but for a handful of urban MPs strongly opposed land reform in any capacity. The Tory leader Northcore gave a long, thunderous address decrying the (rather mild) tenancy rent reform and allowances of land purchase as "confiscation, and proof that the socialist rabble that rebelled in our streets for years has now seized the reins of the Government!" Chamberlain was condemned as a puppetmaster, with only Randolph Churchill quietly suggesting that perhaps a sop to the urban working class was wise. The bill was tabled and passed by a substantial margin; the next day, as per his promise, Hartington ordered Parnell and 20 other Irish leaders released from Kilmainham Gaol. Parnell described his victory as "the Kilmainham Treaty," a name that stuck in the press, suggesting that in dealing with him the Government had legitimized the IPP and even some of the pressure groups. Forster tendered his resignation the next day in protest, and despite the chaos from the popular-in-London "Buckshot" leaving the Government, Hartington rewarded Chamberlain for his skills by naming him Irish Secretary, hoping that his newfound relationship with Parnell would bear fruit [3].

Hartington had scheduled a Commons debate on mobilizing more forces to Egypt when the Tory-dominated House of Lords defeated the Land Act, with six Liberal Lords defecting, including - in a shock - Lord Spencer, the Lord Lieutenant of Ireland. Stunned by the betrayal, Hartington took his Cabinet's temperature again, this time on whether the Government could survive a vote of confidence. The high-profile defeat, and the reaction to it in Ireland - with riots in Dublin and Cork responded to with a brutal crackdown reluctantly ordered by Chamberlain, who had hoped to turn a new leaf, and Parnell defiantly expressing contempt for Hartington and his Cabinet - suggested to many, including the influential Granville whose persuasion finally carried the day, that the Government needed to campaign on the Land Act and earn a mandate for it. Hartington traveled to see Queen Victoria and Prince Arthur the next morning, announcing the resignation of his ministry and requesting a general election be called. Worried about the escalating situation in Egypt, Victoria nearly invited Northcote to form a minority government, but Arthur persuaded her otherwise, pointing out that a minority that substantial in the Commons would have to be led from the Lords in its entirety and could not be reliable upon to carry any acts. One of the shortest elections in British history was thus called, aiming for early July, with Hartington hoping that events in Africa would not have overtaken his government by then..."


[1] Famously pro-Home Rule Liberal Lord
[2] This is of course a radical departure from how OTL's Kilmainham Treaty was cobbled together and sold to the public, to say the least. Gladstone was *not* savvy when it came to Ireland
[3] Chamberlain was actually fairly involved in the OTL negotiations and was surprised not to get this job; Fred Cavendish (Hartington's younger brother) got the nod instead, and he was murdered in Phoenix Park after only a few days on the job.
 
Titan: The Life and Presidency of James G. Blaine
"...the Civil Service Reform Act of 1882, also known as the Pendleton Act, only finally passed the Senate once Garfield relented and made changes to the act that had passed the House to make it more structurally similar to Pendleton's proposal. The House bill would eliminate assessments and by statute would cover fewer civil servants initially, to allow the Civil Service Commission - which would now have 7 members rather than the original proposal of 3 in two 1881 bills - to draft rules on how best to implement reform and to develop examinations. However, Pendleton yielded on the "three-tier" plan from the House, provided that the Commission determine how best to determine which positions were in which tiers and how the "bureau of selection" would be developed. The reworked plan passed the House of May 9th, 177-148, a much narrower margin than before, and probably only passed the Senate thanks to Democratic Senator Daniel Voorhees missing the vote, 27-25, with Pendleton the only Democrat in support of his own act, and two Liberals in opposition. Blaine signed the Act into law - it would be one of the greatest domestic achievements of his Presidency, and despite concerns the Commission was soon filled with genuine reformers. By the following spring, the Commission had released its first set of rules and recommendations; by 1884, nearly three-quarters of customs jobs - the most acrimonious and lucrative spoils appointment under the old regime - were awarded on merit, and more than half of postal positions as well. The widely admired American civil service bureaucracy had, in effective, been born..."

- TItan: The Life and Presidency of James G. Blaine
 
Dixie Imperialism: A History of Confederate Diplomacy, Intrigue and Intervention in the Caribbean
"...an export of the Confederate States as important, or perhaps even more so, than cotton, tobacco or coal was experienced mercenaries, soldiers of fortune from both the War of Independence or the Cuban Expedition, or just general native clearances or slave catching parties, who found new lives and opportunities throughout not just the restive Caribbean but also in South America. For the oligarchs of northern Brazil, Confederate veterans with experience in slaving were in high demand, and the discipline they brought to helping develop local militias put immediate pause to any thoughts on the parts of Rio de Janiero to abolish slavery wholesale after the controversial Law of Free Birth promulgated a decade earlier. Confederate emigres found ample opportunities in the Southern Cone to not only help push government control further south but also in the Saltpeter War and the ensuing tensions among the various powers. Former cavalry officer JEB "Jeb" Stuart found a second calling in Guatemala, where he would soon join the War of Unification that remade Central America in the mid-1880s [1]. However, Dixie mercenaries found their true calling in Mexico during the Caudillo Revolt, fighting on both sides of the conflict, sometimes side-by-side with slaves escaped from the CSA in the preceding decade (and a number of those same slaves were kidnapped and renditioned against their will back to Dixie during and after the fighting by a network of Dixiemen looking to cash in on the generous bounties for escaped slaves in foreign lands, a network of "snatchers" that soon would jeopardize their own government) [2]. The Mexico City government made a number of pledges to any volunteers from foreign lands who came down - a substantial prize of silver for skilled fighters, as well as parcels of land from confiscated property of hacendados who threw in with rebellious caudillos. Via government-held Nuevo Laredo, both Anglo and Tejano volunteers streamed into Mexico to fight for the Empire, most prominently a number of veterans of Nathan Forrest's Great Expedition, including a few original Tennessee Templars. Plenty of men saw opportunity fighting for the rebels as well; Matamoros, in the hands of the most powerful anti-centralist caudillo, Manuel Gonzales, was a crucial gateway for both men crossing the Rio Grande and arriving via New Orleans to offer their services, generally the poor sons of destitute smallholders who saw opportunity in a new land. Even the blockade of Matamoros by the Mexican Navy could not stop the steady trickle of Dixiemen..."

- Dixie Imperialism: A History of Confederate Diplomacy, Intrigue and Intervention in the Caribbean

[1] More on this later
[2] This will be important later on, too
 

Ficboy

Banned
"...an export of the Confederate States as important, or perhaps even more so, than cotton, tobacco or coal was experienced mercenaries, soldiers of fortune from both the War of Independence or the Cuban Expedition, or just general native clearances or slave catching parties, who found new lives and opportunities throughout not just the restive Caribbean but also in South America. For the oligarchs of northern Brazil, Confederate veterans with experience in slaving were in high demand, and the discipline they brought to helping develop local militias put immediate pause to any thoughts on the parts of Rio de Janiero to abolish slavery wholesale after the controversial Law of Free Birth promulgated a decade earlier. Confederate emigres found ample opportunities in the Southern Cone to not only help push government control further south but also in the Saltpeter War and the ensuing tensions among the various powers. Former cavalry officer JEB "Jeb" Stuart found a second calling in Guatemala, where he would soon join the War of Unification that remade Central America in the mid-1880s [1]. However, Dixie mercenaries found their true calling in Mexico during the Caudillo Revolt, fighting on both sides of the conflict, sometimes side-by-side with slaves escaped from the CSA in the preceding decade (and a number of those same slaves were kidnapped and renditioned against their will back to Dixie during and after the fighting by a network of Dixiemen looking to cash in on the generous bounties for escaped slaves in foreign lands, a network of "snatchers" that soon would jeopardize their own government) [2]. The Mexico City government made a number of pledges to any volunteers from foreign lands who came down - a substantial prize of silver for skilled fighters, as well as parcels of land from confiscated property of hacendados who threw in with rebellious caudillos. Via government-held Nuevo Laredo, both Anglo and Tejano volunteers streamed into Mexico to fight for the Empire, most prominently a number of veterans of Nathan Forrest's Great Expedition, including a few original Tennessee Templars. Plenty of men saw opportunity fighting for the rebels as well; Matamoros, in the hands of the most powerful anti-centralist caudillo, Manuel Gonzales, was a crucial gateway for both men crossing the Rio Grande and arriving via New Orleans to offer their services, generally the poor sons of destitute smallholders who saw opportunity in a new land. Even the blockade of Matamoros by the Mexican Navy could not stop the steady trickle of Dixiemen..."

- Dixie Imperialism: A History of Confederate Diplomacy, Intrigue and Intervention in the Caribbean

[1] More on this later
[2] This will be important later on, too
Dixians would be a better synonym for Southerners both male and female.
 
Dixians would be a better synonym for Southerners both male and female.
Yeah I’m still playing around with it. I don’t love “Confederates” or “Southrons” so idk we’ll see.
Confederate is the de jure term to describe Southerners. Dixians and Southrons are nicknames.
Kind of like the difference between "Yankee/Yank" and "American". One's the official demonym of the United States and the other is a nickname.
 
Max, dude. Did you not see what giving land to slaveholding Anglos got Mexico in Texas, let alone what happens when the Confederates let their imperialistic fantasies play out in Cuba? This Confederate mercenary culture is going to have negative consequences for everyone involved.
 
The German on the Spanish Throne: The Reign of Leopold I
"...despite some agitations, though, a decade of peace since the Confederate invasion and ensuing constitutional reforms in Spain had been good for Cuba, which saw a steady balance of immigrants from Spain and the Canaries in particular trickling in to seek out new opportunities and free people of color going the opposite way from the Insular Caribbean Provinces to either the military or the burgeoning factories, particularly the textile mills of Barcelona, rather than stay as tenant farmers on large estates outside of Havana or San Juan. The reality was that for many freedmen, not much had changed - though they were not in formal bondage, the labor laws passed by the Serrano government were haphazardly enforced on the islands and a substantial majority of former slaves worked the same lands they had before, often for the same landholders. Though hundreds of slaveowners had fled to the Confederacy with their chattel during and before the war (which was technically illegal under Confederate law, but such matters were not enforced), the sugar oligarchy still held enormous influence over Cuba's politics and economy, and said economy flourished in the 1880s as Spain signed with the United States the Hay-Sagasta Treaty, the first of many reciprocal treaties that the USA would seek out that lowered specific duties. Spain, whose tariffs were medium-high in comparison to many other economies, completely ended any and all duties on a number of finished luxury goods from the USA, and Washington in turn slashed duties on a handful of goods, most prominently sugar, while keeping their duties on Confederate sugar high. As a result, Havana became the center of the sugar trade to New York and Philadelphia, helping even further spark its renaissance in the years since the war..."

- The German on the Spanish Throne: The Reign of Leopold I
 
The Eaglet Takes Flight: The Reign of Napoleon IV 1874-1905
"...the Alexandria Riots resulted in the immediate evacuation by a multinational fleet of any Europeans left in the city. A small detachment of French marines landed in the city to keep order among the docks and ward off the rioters, before the British Admiral Seymour issued his now-infamous ultimatum - that he would shell the city if the Egyptians did not cease fortifying Alexandria and allow the British fleet to occupy the city. The French refused to participate, having been warned by their government not to do anything that could jeopardize their standing with the Sublime Porte or the Khedive and risk the Suez. The French fleet immediately departed to Port Said and anchored there, and provided logistical assistance for the Ottoman Army being dispatched to Egypt to bring the peace.

The bombardment of Alexandria by Seymour was a hugely controversial event and effectively spelled the end of British influence in much of the Near East. The city was nearly flattened, hundreds of buildings destroyed, all for very little. Two days earlier the British elections had occurred and the government had to immediately pivot its attention to a spiraling Middle East crisis. The British Commons voted to expanded its involvement in Egypt and pacify the country, but before the British Expeditionary Force arrived an Ottoman army crossed into Egypt at Ismailia, with French assistance and military advisors, and marched into Cairo, defeating one of Urabi's armies on the way. Even as protests and riots spread through the Nile Valley, a British presence at Alexandria and French presence at Port Said kept commerce open, and the Ottomans began a brutal, aggressive crackdown on rioters, with the tacit help of Urabi himself, even as they tried to negotiate a final settlement..."

- The Eaglet Takes Flight: The Reign of Napoleon IV 1874-1905
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top