Leo Caesius
Banned
Perhaps the trigger here is "competition" (or contact on a grand scale) rather than any individual cataclysmic event. That seems to be the trigger for evolution as well as linguistic change; the same model could probably be retooled for cultural innovations as well.Hendryk said:It depends, really. Buddhism didn't need to completely destabilize Asian societies in order to spread, it merely waited for new dynasties or periods of interregnum; Japan's conversion to Buddhism during the Nara period was a mostly peaceful time. Even Islam, a religion for which I have no love lost, seems to have been able to spread mostly peacefully in the area, following the trade routes through the Indonesian archipelago and all the way to the Southern Philippines.
One of the problems with the form of Christianity that is most likely to be involved in the Far East during this time, Catholicism, is that it is a very monolithic, rigid, and orthodox faith. Most cultural adaptations involve a certain give and take. The forms of Buddhism and Islam practiced in East Asia are quite different from the ones practiced in their homelands. Furthermore, neither are nearly as centralized as Catholicism, which gives them greater flexibility in a new and alien situation. Catholicism could not adapt to the Near East, and so it had only two choices - either drive out the competition (as in the Philippines, with the exception of Mindanao) or perish in the attempt. The forms of Christianity practiced in places like Korea are generally evangelical, not traditional, and they are frequently heterodox; look at Reverend Moon's Unification Church.