Chiang Kai-Shek goes to Germany: An Axis China Timeline

I'm under the impression that they were comparatively rare IOTL.

Despite what you see on the movies, sub battles are rare. Even more so in this scenario being neither side has radar or sonar yet. Unless they just randomly bump into each other on the surface, and even then they both end up diving and have no way to track the other.

But sense they Know what's being targeted, one can set up accordingly.
won't be perfect, but it's something.

besides, the post also seems to imply the Japanese navy isn't making an effort to stop the Submarine Menace.
 
Last edited:

Hendryk

Banned
Despite what you see on the movies, sub battles are rare. Even more so in this scenario being neither side has radar or sonar yet. Unless they just randomly bump into each other on the surface, and even then they both end up diving and have no way to track the other.
Indeed. I remember reading somewhere that in all the history of submarine warfare, there is only one recorded instance of a sub torpedoing another. Naval history buffs should be able to confirm or infirm this.
 
Indeed. I remember reading somewhere that in all the history of submarine warfare, there is only one recorded instance of a sub torpedoing another. Naval history buffs should be able to confirm or infirm this.

That's not quite true. The book Silent Victory which details the the submarine war from the US perspective in it the author describes several instances on both sides where subs were sunk by another sub.

I can't remember exactly how many, but as was mentioned it was pretty rare. Usually it was by blind chance. I recall an instance where one US sub was on patrol and out of nowhere a Japanese RO type (I think that is what the type was) surfaced right in front of its firing arc. Sank it right off. It seemed that was about the only way a sub could sink another sub back then.
 
The Split Arrow: The National Revolutionary Air Force in The Early Second Great War
The Split Arrow: The National Revolutionary Air Force in The Early Second Great War

...The early days of the Second Great War saw the NRAF outclassed, outfought and outthought. The NRAF's planes were technically inferior to that of the Japanese air forces, their tactical doctrine - focussed mostly on ground support was obsolete in an era of indepdendent air forces and strategically in a bad positions...

p39b.jpg

Cutting edge when introduced, the Feng Ru V was showing it's age by 1938 despite upgrades

One of the primary problems of the NRAF was in their obsolete air craft, although the NRAF boasted one of the largest air forces in the world with nearly 5000 models of aircraft in different makes the main fighter the Feng Ru V was beginning to show it's age. The FR V had originally been based on the Junkers D.I aircraft and despite many upgrades on it's engines it was beginning to show it's age. The main problem was that the chassis was far too small to fit a bigger engine and that it had reached it's potential for further development. This was a problem as 4/5ths of the NRAF was that of FR Vs. There needed to be a new fighter design that could fulfill the multi-role nature of the FR V.

images

FR VI refuelling

The FR VI, like it's predecessor the FR V and the FR IV would also be derived from a German design - that of the Bf 109. Early prototype production began as early as late 1937 with an initial 10 being completed by the time of the Amoy attack. The obvious inferiority of the FR V in combat against the new Japanese figher planes - especially against the "Zero" which could outclimb, outspeed and outmanoeuvre the FR V meant that the Japanese gained effective air superiority over China. Indeed, in the early days of the Japanese invasion the kill ration for an average Japanese pilot was 5:1. The FR VI would be a much bigger plane that could fit a bigger engine - however, it was not due to enter mass production until 1939 where it would begin replacing the FR V, Chiang personally approved fast-tracking the mass production process to early 1938 instead.

Locals-from-Chungking-Chi-001.jpg

Japanese bombing of Chinese cities prompted a major revision of Chinese

The tactical weakness of the NRAF was the result of it's role as a support air force. Indeed - there were no independent air squadrons with the doctrine suggesting that there would be one air squadron to one National Revolutionary Army division. The major flaw of this doctrine was it's inflexibility - it could not vary it's strenght whereas the enemy could. There were two main factors in the revision of this doctrine - the first was the Peking Pocket, rather than risk destruction at the pocket, many squadron leaders flew out of the pocket. This left the squadrons as 'indepdendent' ones and were used to good effect in protecting the air supply convoys of the pocket. The second was the bombing campaigns that the Japanese waged against Chinese cities. The garrison divisions protecting cities such as Shanghai usually contained only 30 planes which were greatly inadequate for protecting large cities - this prompted an ad-hoc approach where the area commands shifted planes to the divisions that needed them. But the two factors meant that there was little sense in continuing an obsolte doctrine.

As a response to the changing situation and obvious flaws in the current doctrine a revolution occured in NRAF organization. The NRAF was reorganized into a completely independent air force - as opposed to merely a theoretical one. The attachment of air squadrons to divisions was discontinued and there was - finally a centralized air force command. Although Air General Feng Ru had allowed Chiang to micromanage the air force - in return for lots of resources invested in it, Chiang was now too busy with the general war effort to micromanage everything. The air force was organized into a unified command structure with three major "commands" or missions the first command was the air support one - which would oversee the pursuit of air superiority in the battlefield and support ground troops. The squadrons dedicated to the "Air support" role were attached to Army HQ - not the divisional HQ as was the previous practise. The second command was that of "air defence" this was the attempt to pursue air superiority in China and defend Chinese cities - an early warning system was devised and implemented quickly. The final command was of "sea defence" which was the Chinese air force working with the Chinese navy to pin-point and sink Japanese vessels - as the NRAF lacked the means to pursue this at this point, most of the resources were directed to the crucial task of "air defence." With a reorganized command structure, a new tactical doctrine and a formiddable new fighter entering production the National Revolutionary Air Force was finally beginning to get ready to fight the Japanese on even terms. But first there needed to be the cathartic impact of a "Revengre Raid" for all that the Japanese had done so far.
 
It sounds like the Chinese airforce tactics copied the Russian tank tactics. Penny packets of planes for each division to be used in infantry support. Not a good plan. Its good they learned from their mistake quicker than the Russians did.
 
Interesting update! Chinese Bf-109's...too cool. My only nitpick would be the "Zero"...wouldn't they be facing Japanese Army aircraft like the Nakajima KI-43 rather than Naval ones like the A6M? Or did I miss something in the Update Blitz where the IJN is leading the invasion?
 
Cutting edge when introduced, the Feng Ru V was showing it's age by 1938 despite upgrades
Sorry...I laugh every time I look or think of that thing. It looks ridiculous for some reason, especially next to the words "cutting edge".
 
Indeed. I remember reading somewhere that in all the history of submarine warfare, there is only one recorded instance of a sub torpedoing another. Naval history buffs should be able to confirm or infirm this.

There is only one instance of a sub sinking another sub while submerged-a British one sunk a German one during WWII, unfortunately I don't remember the names of either, and the only reason I know about it is that Archeology Magazine did a brief blurb on it when the found the German wreck. However, subs did occasionally sink other surfaced subs.
 
So, ITTL, when will WW2 be considered to have started?

The Chinese state would probably considere the Japanese surprise attack to be its beginning, since the Mandchuko affair wasn´t considered a war as much as a fight against pro-japanese bandits?
 
So, ITTL, when will WW2 be considered to have started?

The Chinese state would probably considere the Japanese surprise attack to be its beginning, since the Mandchuko affair wasn´t considered a war as much as a fight against pro-japanese bandits?

It's like today - depends who you ask

A Chinese person IOTL would say that WW2 started with the Japanese invasion of China. ITTL he would say that WW2 started with the "liberation of Manchuria"
 
I can just imagine an Axis USA in this timeline and the US government's attitude to their 'alliance' with the Axis; 'you're a son of a bitch, but your a son of a bitch who is shooting at our enemies'.

I can actually weirdly imagine the Big Three Conferences (actually, it will probably be either the Big Two or Big Four (Germany, USA, Italy, China) as well. I need to get a grip on reality.
 

Hendryk

Banned
As a response to the changing situation and obvious flaws in the current doctrine a revolution occured in NRAF organization.
I'd missed this update since it was posted during my time off. As you well know, I'm a sucker for Chinese aviation counterfactuals ;)

It's a good thing that in your TL Feng Ru is the NRAF's commanding officer; in mine he went back to civilian life in 1922.
 
It's like today - depends who you ask

A Chinese person IOTL would say that WW2 started with the Japanese invasion of China. ITTL he would say that WW2 started with the "liberation of Manchuria"

I thought that a German person would agree, as Goebbels can state that the war started with allied agression. :D
 
I can just imagine an Axis USA in this timeline and the US government's attitude to their 'alliance' with the Axis; 'you're a son of a bitch, but your a son of a bitch who is shooting at our enemies'.

I can actually weirdly imagine the Big Three Conferences (actually, it will probably be either the Big Two or Big Four (Germany, USA, Italy, China) as well. I need to get a grip on reality.

However much the USA may hope China beats Japan in a 1 on 1 fight. They'll support Britain & France against Germany.

Of coures given how things stand that USA wont save to worry about Japan so much either.
 
What after Roosevelt? Imagine an 2010 US/UK/Ca where the Japanese are described by history books to have comitted a few atrocities here and there but where really fighting the noble fight against the hideous fascist beasts. While not exactly being called a democracy, the Empire of Japan would still be seen as having "almost brought down teh horribul dictator only second to Hitler himself".

Of course, that totalitarian 21st century China have actual free elections and mererly authoritarian Japan doesn´t isn´t going to be given much attention either.

Of coures given how things stand that USA wont save to worry about Japan so much either.

Yep, no Pearl Harbour.
 
Top