Oh sorry yeah:Who is that Elizabeth of Nassau? James of Kendal's bride was not Amalie of Brandeburg?
Charles and Sophia Charlotte
Mary and Louis
James and Amalie
Edgar and Elizabeth
Anne and John
How's that?
Oh sorry yeah:Who is that Elizabeth of Nassau? James of Kendal's bride was not Amalie of Brandeburg?
Oh sorry yeah:
Charles and Sophia Charlotte
Mary and Louis
James and Amalie
Edgar and Elizabeth
Anne and John
How's that?
Same, perhaps anne and Edgar are twinsI think we have matched well everyone
Why would we have her be born earlier? For an earlier marriage?Now next question should Sophia Charlotte be born I. 1661 or her otl birthdate
Yes.Why would we have her be born earlier? For an earlier marriage?
In which case who'd be the bride?Maybe. I feel like Charles would look for a bride for his heir early in life and she was born in 1668, and by that time he’d be right and maybe already have a bride picked out.
If Charles wants his nephew to marry someone agreeable to the French but not fully committ himself to a French bride, Maria Anna Victoria of Bavaria is a great option. If they want a German Protestant bride there is Elisabeth Henriette of Hesse-Kassel.In which case who'd be the bride?
Hmm interesting you think she rather than the hanoverian bride?If Charles wants his nephew to marry someone agreeable to the French but not fully committ himself to a French bride, Maria Anna Victoria of Bavaria is a great option. If they want a German Protestant bride there is Elisabeth Henriette of Hesse-Kassel.
She's also six years older than Mary. Abd tbf, one could have Sophia born earlier and then have the marriage take place in 1680No I would perfer the Hanoverian bride born around 1668. I don’t know if Charles II would arrange either of the marriages I mentioned above or not. There’s also Mary of Modena. She was preferred by Louis XIV and two years older.
Maybe. I feel like Charles would look for a bride for his heir early in life and she was born in 1668, and by that time he’d be right and maybe already have a bride picked out.
Maria Anna Victoria and Elisabeth Henriette are both great options specially because France had no princesses to offer excluding Charles and James' nieces. Maria Anna would likely be the better match but religion can play a big part in favour of Elisabeth and the fact who little Charles is not the direct heir can play against him with the Elector of BavariaIf Charles wants his nephew to marry someone agreeable to the French but not fully committ himself to a French bride, Maria Anna Victoria of Bavaria is a great option. If they want a German Protestant bride there is Elisabeth Henriette of Hesse-Kassel.
I'd say Byblos 1672.Maria Anna Victoria and Elisabeth Henriette are both great options specially because France had no princesses to offer excluding Charles and James' nieces. Maria Anna would likely be the better match but religion can play a big part in favour of Elisabeth and the fact who little Charles is not the direct heir can play against him with the Elector of Bavaria
In any case in what year you think Charles will start to think to his nephew as heir? I will say not before 1772 if not 1775 (aka just before marrying off our Charlie)
I correct my mistake... I was reading/commenting three or four tl the same time so...I'd say Byblos 1672.
No worries, I’d say Charles II would consider his nephew his successor come 1672,and somwould start looking for bides for himI correct my mistake... I was reading/commenting three or four tl the same time so...
They definitely could.Having a look at Elisabeth Henriette of Hesse Kassel, otl she had only one child before dying from small pox, but her father and mother had five surviving children. I imagine that if she doesn't catch smallpox, she and Charles of Cambridge could have a similar amount of children.
@JonasResende @Nmale @isabella What do you guys think, Elisabeth or Sophia Charlotte?
Do you think she’d be a better pick than Sophia?They definitely could.
I don’t know both of Them are good choices.Do you think she’d be a better pick than Sophia?