Max Sinister
Banned
Charles d'Anjou is successful with the 7th crusade in 1270, Tunisia is incorporated in Sicily.
My Chaos TL also has an Italianized Tunisia.
My Chaos TL also has an Italianized Tunisia.
Charles d'Anjou is successful with the 7th crusade in 1270, Tunisia is incorporated in Sicily.
My Chaos TL also has an Italianized Tunisia.
Two possibilities:
1. The Norman Kingdom of Sicily actually conquered much of Tunisia and held it c. 1130-1160. However I doubt even if they held it longer that the culture would change, given the Normans themselves did not become overly Italianized.
Was this because he was from Mahdia or was it because he captured the city of Mahdia?And AHP, there were North African Christians, albeit a very tiny minority. One of the Admirals of Palermo was named Philip of Mahdia*, IIRC
*A town in Tunisia.
This kind of TL pleases me greatly. To say the least, a Norman-Sicilian North Africa is a challenge, but possible. Have the large North African Caliphate (who's name escapes me) shatter, and have some of the admirals of Palermo pick up the pieces. The area could slowly become Italianized overtime.
And AHP, there were North African Christians, albeit a very tiny minority. One of the Admirals of Palermo was named Philip of Mahdia*, IIRC
*A town in Tunisia.
@Abudl: Depends. The Byzantines also managed to rechristianize Anatolia, remember? In said Chaos TL, North Africa is also (partly) rechristianized - and many Muslims become Spanish slavesinstead of blacks.
Was this because he was from Mahdia or was it because he captured the city of Mahdia?
Yes, I read your Italo-Norman empire thread. Interested in some kind of collaboration?I've actually played around quite a bit with the concept of an Italo-Norman empire, both in Africa and on the Levant (they almost got the Principality of Antioch). However any scenario would be short lived, as I can't see them holding them for any longer than another century, even assuming the Hauteville dynasty survives.
But who knows? Maybe someone more creative or knowledgable then me can come up with something.
Firstly, yes and no. He converted to Islam later in his life, but started out as a Greek Cristian. Secondly, I didn't know his birth place. I had just assumed that the 'of Mahdia' part meant 'from Mahdia'First of all, he was Muslim, second, he was from Sicily, not Tunis (he was a eunuch, left over from the Arab administration) and third, he was executed by Roger as part of a purge of the remaining Muslim elements at court.
Yes, I read your Italo-Norman empire thread. Interested in some kind of collaboration?
Excellent!Actually, that thought just occurred to me. I think between the two of us, we could come up with something worthwhile.
Yes, I read your Italo-Norman empire thread. Interested in some kind of collaboration?
Firstly, yes and no. He converted to Islam later in his life, but started out as a Greek Cristian. Secondly, I didn't know his birth place. I had just assumed that the 'of Mahdia' part meant 'from Mahdia'
Third is just flat out wrong. The king grew up with Muslim tutors and spoke Arabic fluently. He trusted the Muslim advisers more than his fellow Normans. Why would Roger himself, who's courtiers and high administrators were Muslims, who ruled over a country which relied on its Muslim population for its continued wealth and prosperity, want to initiate a purge of the Muslims of his government?
It is true that Philip of Mahdia was executed, but most probably by ambitious Latin courtiers (seeing as he held the highest political office short of the throne)
Which is why I don't use it all that oftenSorry, but Wikipedia is, as usual, incomplete and wrong, and based on old and outdated sources.
Is Philip a common Muslim name?Your Philip was possibly born a Christian, but as a eunuch in a Muslim court he would have been castrated and converted as a child.
Adobe is broken. I'm working on installing a freeware version of it.Did you read the document I linked?
Sure, they were liquidated, but not by him. Due to his possible early senility as Falcundus puts it, his Latin court advisers had a lot more free reign to eliminate their rivals.Roger used a lot of Muslim officials because he needed a qualified bureaucracy, but late in his reign there were political reasons to liquidate them.
Why? The religious orientation of group of people are hardly set in stone. If they were, Lithuania should still be Pagan, and Mexicans should be worshiping the Aztec pantheon.In any case, this is a side discussion. Tunis is Muslim and can't be converted. There is no chance at this date of re-Christianizing it.
Is Philip a common Muslim name?
Which is why I don't use it all that often
Is Philip a common Muslim name?
Adobe is broken. I'm working on installing a freeware version of it.
Sure, they were liquidated, but not by him. Due to his possible early senility as Falcundus puts it, his Latin court advisers had a lot more free reign to eliminate their rivals.
Why? The religious orientation of group of people are hardly set in stone. If they were, Lithuania should still be Pagan, and Mexicans should be worshiping the Aztec pantheon.