For centuries "Bluebeard" was considered one of history's greatest monsters, his guilt as firmly estab-
lished as the shape of the earth. But in recent decades defenders of Gilles have stepped forward, arguing
that he was in fact framed, and thus innocent- and it must be said they made some good points(for
example, that much of the voluminous evidence against him was actually procured by torture, that no
child's corpse was ever found @ his castle, & that his chief prosecutor, in what today would be regarded as a blatant conflict-of-interest, was awarded Gilles' lands after his execution). In fact in 1992 a special French court of rehabilitation found Gilles innocent! Nonetheless, I am skeptical. Lord knows medieval
justice all too often left much to be desired. But if Gilles didn't kill all those poor children, who did?( They
didn't just disappear!) But, my fellow posters, as this thread's title says- your thoughts!
lished as the shape of the earth. But in recent decades defenders of Gilles have stepped forward, arguing
that he was in fact framed, and thus innocent- and it must be said they made some good points(for
example, that much of the voluminous evidence against him was actually procured by torture, that no
child's corpse was ever found @ his castle, & that his chief prosecutor, in what today would be regarded as a blatant conflict-of-interest, was awarded Gilles' lands after his execution). In fact in 1992 a special French court of rehabilitation found Gilles innocent! Nonetheless, I am skeptical. Lord knows medieval
justice all too often left much to be desired. But if Gilles didn't kill all those poor children, who did?( They
didn't just disappear!) But, my fellow posters, as this thread's title says- your thoughts!
Last edited: