William II - no evidence either way. Never married, no known mistresses, no mention of any sexual encounters (no matter what modern day enlightened thinking postulates) =/ = must have been gay.
You'd be looking for a "long time male friend" who seemed to fill no reasonable purpose at court.
There's always the possibility of asexuality based upon physical inability. Not merely impotence, but down right genital deformation.
Wow how many gay popes does that mean we've had
Uh...I can only say, that one of my assistant Lutheran pastors made mention to me that if priests were allowed to marry "...then maybe there wouldn't be so many homosexuals in the Roman Catholic Church (hierarchy)."

Queen Elizabeth I was a lesbian (1)
Hey wait, Jesus never married, hanged around with 12 men and their is no mention of any sexual encounters ..... OMG (2)
1) I was ALWAYS under the belief that Elizabeth I's condition was so severe in terms of her personal biology that sex itself would have been physically painful for her. Gustavus Aldophus' daughter Christina, OTOH...
2) OMG, you've never heard of Mary Magdalene?
