1923. 1975. I WIN.
Well, not really I guess, since Britain is involved, but indirectly due to the civil war.
This is fairly easy, kill off Hitler during the war, and have a more successful Stresemann bring Europe closer together out of mutual antagonism towards the Soviet Union and the need
for greater economic cooperation. Subsequently have both the Soviets and Europeans develop nuclear weapons within several years of each other, maintaining MAD for decades.
Until early 2013, when an Able Archer style malfunction leads to one side believing the other has launched a first strike, and there's no Stanislav Petrov to calm things down.
Yep, there's a huge amount of possibilities. Perhaps if OP specified some constraints for this hypothetical WWII this would be more of a challenge.
UK avoids or delays entry into WW1
Result being early defeat of France and German victory in the East.
Best case - assume French defeat in early 1915 followed by relatively lenient peace terms (say Belgium puppetised, minor losses in Lorraine to Germany, possibly some gains in Africa and Polynesia for the
Germans). UK acts as intermediary in arranging peace terms.
Russia and Germany / Austria go head to head with OTL result. Russian revolution confined to rump Russia.
Communism is ideaology of choice in post war Europe - contained (barely) in France (civil war?) and revanchist communist Russia rises in East based around Ural resources. Ukraine eventually slips out of
Austrian control (perhaps when Austria is destabilised by leftist nationalist supported by Russia). Anschluss with Russia. Nuclear weapons discovered
Multipolar Cold War along the OTL USSR / Poland / Romania borders with brushfire proxy wars in Souterh Europe (Greece, Italy, Spain)
No WW2
Whenever the Russian and German empires fight the result is always OTL: one of my 'favorite' cliches. I don't see how WWI can continue long after an early of France. Russia cannot hope for victory now that France is gone, and can put the blame on French surrender monkeys, so it has no reason not to seek peace. Nor does Germany have any real reason to keep fighting. Even in OTL it did not ask for Ukraine during the first round of negotiations in 1917, and only occupied it to put an end to the fighting. Only then, when it already had Ukraine under its control, did Germany decide that it might as well keep it.
Well I guess I am breaking the rules by not using a 1914 POD but a 1939 POD instead.
Delaying WWII is easy - Poland roles over and gives in to Germany's demands in 1939, then what? Or if you want to be a little more out of the box, in the summer of 1939 there is a pro-Nazi coup in Poland and
Poland becomes Nazi Germany's first "minor ally" before Bulgaria, Hungary, Finland, and Romania.
Poland might indeed give in, but a pro-Nazi coup is ASB under any circumstances. If you want coups, the closest you could get is a pro-German coup (meant to avoid war with Germany, not in support of Nazi ideology), and even that requires PoDs well before 1939.
Last edited: