In the twenties & thirties shocked by the apparent futility of the carnage of WW1, many people campaigned for 'Disarmament'. It had the effect of restricting the military budgets of the western democracies when they needed it.
Likewise, in Western Europe - CND shocked by the apparent futility of the potential carnage of nuclear war, campaigns against the military (no doubt aided and abetted by ......).
Hence the challenge - should you choose to accept it.
Have CND (or at least a sizeable faction) while still campaigning against nuclear weapons, advocates an increase by NATO countries in defence spending on conventional weapons. The theory being, that in any conflict, it will take longer for nuclear weapons to be used.
It will be interesting to see the various POD's people use. And what effect this will have on later actual conflicts - with the better equipment 'now' available.
Good luck