Challenge: AHF has a more Nazi wank point of view

With a PoD of 2004, can Alternate History Forums grow as large as it is today, but have a majority of the website believe that Germany could have won WWII?
 
As we aren't changing history, all that is required is more members who believe Germany had a reasonable chance to win WWII, and less members who didn't.

That really can't be that hard to arrange.
 
As we aren't changing history, all that is required is more members who believe Germany had a reasonable chance to win WWII, and less members who didn't.

That really can't be that hard to arrange.


Can't be done by 2004:

You'd need to get rid of Alison and probably soc.history.what-if.

yours,
Sam.
 
You would also need to get rid of common sense, and the knowledge of Germany's many, many faults in both industrial capacity and output, a well as their insane strategic goals.
 
IMHO there's no reason why Germany has to be seen as "always losing" WWII regardless of the circumstances.

One of my favorite TL on this site is Calbear's Anglo/American Nazi War, a creative AH which uses a fairly common POD (the Germans winning at Stalingrad) to fully develop a fresh take on the Cold War (or rather, Warm War) between Nazi Germany and the U.S.

And being as AH is fiction first and foremost, I don't see the problem with having Nazi Germany win WWII as long as it is internally consistent, reasonably explained, and well-researched.

Even the most unrealistic Nazi-victory AH, such as Philip K. Dick's The Man In The High Castle, are the best for these and other reasons.

An excellent AH.com TL can include a Nazi-victory scenario and can still be well-written, interesting, engaging, etc.
 
Of course Germany can win WWII. They can't win with a POD in 1945, but they certainly can in 1940. World War One and Two are what got me interested in this genre in the first place.
 
Top