Is it possible that under a longer Krustev Administration that the U.S.S.R could survive and even make prosperity?
Last edited:
Is it possible that under a longer Krustev Administration that the U.S.S.R could survive and even make prosperity?
About as possible as you writing a grammatically correct, correctly-spelled sentence in the English language?
Spell check is your friend.
I think the best way for the Soviet Union to survive is to use the Chinese model. Keep the repressive government and introduce free enterprise.
Why not more worker management? That's much more in line with Socialist ideals than traditional small businesses, and arguably central planning. They could use Yugoslavia as a model in some ways for that. Only reason they didn't perhaps was it would loosen government control more than traditional businesses.
I second this. The most important thing in making the system succeed is to make the economy a bit more responsive to the demands of people, and to boost productivity, and I don't really see how this will do it. Using a system that incorporated entrepreneurial energy but without the negative effects that come from large corporations would be the most beneficial for the USSR, whilst still keeping large state-owned or setting up worker-owned industries where the demand is more static.How would that work exactly?
I second this. The most important thing in making the system succeed is to make the economy a bit more responsive to the demands of people, and to boost productivity, and I don't really see how this will do it. Using a system that incorporated entrepreneurial energy but without the negative effects that come from large corporations would be the most beneficial for the USSR, whilst still keeping large state-owned or setting up worker-owned industries where the demand is more static.
This is a pretty good summary on how such an economy worksHow would that work exactly?