All,
We probably have bashed this one to death a few times, but … here goes:
If we look at the objectives for Case Blue, these were after all rational:
Knock out the oil supply to Soviet.
If we look at it in a holistic way, all the other issues do come to the fore:
1) Stalingrad must be knocked out as it is sitting as the threat to any flank invading Caucasus
2) The Don bend is the danger area. It has to be enforced
3) The coast of the Black Sea is not secured. A straight drive towards Baku will expose it
4) The mountains are a bit of a challenge
5) … and so on
The obstacle suddenly also became the extended supply lines (logistics!) and the continued Soviet counter-attacks.
Obviously, if Stalingrad had been invest in August, it would have looked different, but one thing is to 'win' a city, another is to maximise the outcome - are denial, bridgehead, infra-structure, etc etc.
Splitting AG South into A and B might have been the 'right' decision at the time, but could AG South have dome it all anyway? The tasks would still have been the same: Don Bend, Stalingrad, etc etc.
Maybe if Case Blue would have had a single goal: destroy Baku.
But that would have involved much more of LW. Not practical after all.
Was it a dead end?
… or how would you have done it?
We probably have bashed this one to death a few times, but … here goes:
If we look at the objectives for Case Blue, these were after all rational:
Knock out the oil supply to Soviet.
If we look at it in a holistic way, all the other issues do come to the fore:
1) Stalingrad must be knocked out as it is sitting as the threat to any flank invading Caucasus
2) The Don bend is the danger area. It has to be enforced
3) The coast of the Black Sea is not secured. A straight drive towards Baku will expose it
4) The mountains are a bit of a challenge
5) … and so on
The obstacle suddenly also became the extended supply lines (logistics!) and the continued Soviet counter-attacks.
Obviously, if Stalingrad had been invest in August, it would have looked different, but one thing is to 'win' a city, another is to maximise the outcome - are denial, bridgehead, infra-structure, etc etc.
Splitting AG South into A and B might have been the 'right' decision at the time, but could AG South have dome it all anyway? The tasks would still have been the same: Don Bend, Stalingrad, etc etc.
Maybe if Case Blue would have had a single goal: destroy Baku.
But that would have involved much more of LW. Not practical after all.
Was it a dead end?
… or how would you have done it?