It's interesting to think that if such vessels were built and were commissioned in the mid 90's you would probably see the Queen Elizabeth class (or close equivalent) coming online as per our time line in 2017/2020 when the carriers would be approaching the end of their lives.
Given that the carriers would have likely seen service in the Balkans, Sierra Leone, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Iraq again plus the odd deployment to the South Atlantic to tell Argentina to get back in her box

the government would probably be much more willing to spend money on the QE class than the were IOTL.
The only major difference with the QE's in this timeline would be its CATOBAR configuration. Nuclear power is still unlikely due to costs and lack of experience with operating nuclear reactors in surface ships (Unless the carriers built in the mid 90's are nukes, but again unlikely).
The airgroup is almost guaranteed to be comprised of F35 C's. Particularly if the FAA has spent the last 20 years operating the F/A-18/F-14. However it is possible that this far into an ATL some viable alternative may arise.
In this navy you would also likely see a replacement for fearless/intrepid. however in order to save money and meet the need for LPH capability without compromising carrier capability you would probably see 2 ships of a combined LPH/LPD type similar to the French Mistral class or Spanish Juan Carlos class.