Cannibalistic Nazis

Status
Not open for further replies.

Polemarchos

Banned
Not to play mod or anything, but I'm really not sure if ideas this vile and deranged should be posted on the board.

In any case, the average German is going to have trouble with the idea of eating the carcass of a Cat or Dog, let alone slaughtered enemy civilians, this is beyond even them. As for the Nazis themselves, I have a feeling that they'd think themselves far to civilized to stoop so low (in their eyes mind, the whole industrial genocide thing more or less had them at the bottom of the barrel already).

Get off it m8, his scenario was fun. As for whether it's asb, maybe the SS make cannibalism into a Wotan initiation ritual.
 
Cannibalism is wrong on so many levels.
First it is a very inefficient use of agricultural resources. Humans are at the top of the food chain and need to eat disproportionately large amounts of protein. For example, beef cattle eat three times as much as pigs to produce the same amount of meat (protein).
There's a perverse idea, narrow Nazi production of meat to pork and watch the Jews starve because of their religious inhibitions about eating pork.
Thirdly, Hitler's vegetarian diet caused a variety of medical problems - including flatulence. Hitler's doctor tried to solve those health problems with a bizarre combination of drugs that accelerated his demise.
Convincing Nazi citizens to eat the flesh of untermensch would require a massive propaganda campaign.
Finally, you only get high-quality meat from well-fed, well-housed, happy live-stock .... the opposite of ghetto refugees chased into forced labour camps.
 
I think the idea is that most of the Germans wouldn't know they're actually eating murdered Jews and the like.

According to some material I've read, the "1968 generation" of Germans was so radical because their parents (the WWII generation) refused to discuss or face up to what they'd been involved with during the war. An article I read about how the Valkyrie plotters were viewed in Germany stated that the war generation viewed them as traitors, but they're considered heroes now.

If the German people learn that the Nazis were actually feeding them dead people, I imagine there'd be a lot less sympathy for them in the war generation. That in turn might have some political effects down the right.

Hitler's personal vegetarianism would present an obstacle to that, however. Maybe it's something done without his knowledge?

That in turn would give the Holocaust deniers some credibility--there'd be something done within the Reich that's horrible that Hitler wouldn't actually know about.
 
Get off it m8, his scenario was fun. As for whether it's asb, maybe the SS make cannibalism into a Wotan initiation ritual.

I can't imagine if being fun if you had or have family who suffered on account of Nazi race ideology, which I'm more then certain plenty of board members probably have.
 
Cannibalism is wrong on so many levels.
First it is a very inefficient use of agricultural resources. Humans are at the top of the food chain and need to eat disproportionately large amounts of protein. For example, beef cattle eat three times as much as pigs to produce the same amount of meat (protein).
There's a perverse idea, narrow Nazi production of meat to pork and watch the Jews starve because of their religious inhibitions about eating pork.
Thirdly, Hitler's vegetarian diet caused a variety of medical problems - including flatulence. Hitler's doctor tried to solve those health problems with a bizarre combination of drugs that accelerated his demise.
Convincing Nazi citizens to eat the flesh of untermensch would require a massive propaganda campaign.
Finally, you only get high-quality meat from well-fed, well-housed, happy live-stock .... the opposite of ghetto refugees chased into forced labour camps.

Jewish law would require the Jews to eat the pork in order to survive. You're not allowed to die for the sake of kashrut, to do so would be a worse violation than actually eating the unclean.
 
Thought should not be censored.

Lord in heaven what is it with this sort of argument "Anti-PC" argument showing up all the time these days? It's a forum for the love of god, not the press. I thought it might be distasteful, by your own logic I've the right to put that out.
 
Can't really see a wide spread official policy.

Something like Stalingrad or the Japanese might be more possible.
Or maybe like that Post-WWI German fella who killed people and sold the meat for people to eat.
 

Polemarchos

Banned
Lord in heaven what is it with this sort of argument "Anti-PC" argument showing up all the time these days? It's a forum for the love of god, not the press. I thought it might be distasteful, by your own logic I've the right to put that out.

Sure you do. I then have the right to look down on the people "subtly" telling the op that the mods are coming to shut him down.


Here's the deal: Nazis are evil. He's questioning how evil the nazis can be before the populace revolts. That's not offensive in my opinion. If that's offensive, any timeline involving a surviving nazi regime is offensive. Any questions about a more successful Soviet campaign would then be distasteful before of the holdomir and the mass rapes. Any talk about victorious crusaders is also distasteful because of their crimes. Ditto goes for Mohammed and his young wife. Then we've got to talk about what the hebrews did to the caananites. Then the French reign of terror. Then no more thanksgiving. Then no more tacos at the lunch line.


This is a website all about what ifs. If you start shaming the questions, you'll stop worthy discussions.
 
It doesn't take much imagination to see that it is a perverse possibility of this happening.

But I don't think it would even be considered if Hitler were the one in charge (due to his personal views) or while there is even an inkling of another option. Now if there's a famine and Hitler is no longer in charge, I can see like a canned hamburger/Soylent Green type situation evolving. It of course would never be revealed to the public.
 
Sure you do. I then have the right to look down on the people "subtly" telling the op that the mods are coming to shut him down.


Here's the deal: Nazis are evil. He's questioning how evil the nazis can be before the populace revolts. That's not offensive in my opinion. If that's offensive, any timeline involving a surviving nazi regime is offensive. Any questions about a more successful Soviet campaign would then be distasteful before of the holdomir and the mass rapes. Any talk about victorious crusaders is also distasteful because of their crimes. Ditto goes for Mohammed and his young wife. Then we've got to talk about what the hebrews did to the caananites. Then the French reign of terror. Then no more thanksgiving. Then no more tacos at the lunch line.


This is a website all about what ifs. If you start shaming the questions, you'll stop worthy discussions.

Honestly I don't suspect that this thread really is going to warren't a shutdown, and the point that Lateknight made regarding instances of Japanese Cannibalism are valid enough for sure. As for the whole the whole "if we ban x then next its x" thing goes I think your taking it all a little to far to be perfectly honest, especially sense most of those things relate to side effects of historical events happening, rather then, I don't know, a thread dedicated specifically to one twisted idea. Sure enough, Nazis are evil, and sure enough, the question of whether they'd institutionalize cannibalism was met with skepticism from most posters (including myself). The Nazi's being evil doesn't stop a what if devoted to trying to push them to officially regulated cannibalization of "subhuman" peoples from coming off as a tad bit tasteless and possibly offensive to some members of the board.
 
It is a dicusstion board though and I really don't see why canniablism should be censored, it's not like it's beyond the nazis. Anyways talking about ww2 people eaters didn't the Japanese eat some people or that not true?

There were reported incidents.

Some of them nearly ate George H.W. Bush.
 

gaijin

Banned
Say the Nazis regard the Slavs and Jews as even less human and an attempt to improve logistics on the eastern front and free up farmers the Nazis start having troops eat Slavs and Jews and start shipping them back to Germany. Would something like improve German supply lines ,what would be the Soviet and international reaction during and post war .

Get off it m8, his scenario was fun. As for whether it's asb, maybe the SS make cannibalism into a Wotan initiation ritual.
m
A scenario where the SS is using Jews and Salvs as food is "fun"????

Sorry, that sentiment is just fucked up.
 
This thread should be locked, not for the sake being PC, but for the sake of it being a nonsensical question.

Really, no one in their right mind within the Nazi Hierachy would propose this to their vegetarian totalitarian.

The topic borders on frivolous at best
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top