I must admit its the first time I hear that they planned to assimilate a sizable portion of Russians. Where does this information come from ?
It is my reasoning out from the numbers I have found about Ukrainians and Bielorussians, and no foreseeable difference in Nazi racist worldviews between them and Russians. If they planned 25-30% for Ukrainians and Bielorussians, I fully expect similar numbers for Russians proper. If you find sources to the contrary, I welcome them, as I found no hard numbers.
From what I read it was 10-15 years.
Maybe, but assuming at least another decade from optimistic planning hitting hard reality seems prudent, esp. since they would also have to restructure and rebuild whole continental Europe to an empire after a general war, and ajust to superpower status in a budding Cold War with America, while they carry on their racial schemes in the East.
The percentage of Poles to be eliminated was 80-85%
Sources, please ? I found no such numbers for Poles.
-they were not considered on the same level as Czechs, as Nazis viewed them as having less Germanised. Only 3 to 4 milion Poles were considered Polonised Germans. That leaves around 20 milion to eliminate.
Hmm, in the lack of cotnrary evidence, I am more than a bit skeptical that Poles were going to be given a even harsher deal than Ukrainians and Bielorussians. In all plausibility, they were to be deemed "racially closer" to Germans than the latter, with rather ampler opportunity with commingling with Germanics in the centuries past. Maybe not as good as 50% for Czech, but 30-40% seems wholly plausible.
I don't think the Russians posssed any significant number of people that were to undergo Germanization.
As I said, I lack direct evidence for them, but reason from analogy to Ukrainians and Bielorussians.
Of course you need to add 11 milion Jews, milions of Ukrainians, Belarussians and other minorities.
True, although at least for the Jews, I point out that most PoDs that make Nazi victory possible would occur and make their effects felt before the Nazis fully committed to Final Solution in early 1942. Therefore, counter-intuitively, in a Nazi victory world, it is actually more likely that they stick to the original plan, deporting the Jews to some distant corner of Africa or Asia. The Jews would pass through the deportation crucible but the vast majority of them would survive in Madagascar or the like, whileas more dead Slavs would take their place in the mass grave.
In practice, this would marginally help Nazi PR, since the Jewish diaspora in the New World was much more powerful and influential than the Slav one.
As there is a signifcant Polish,Ukrainian and Jewish diaspora in United States(and in Canada as well) I think we can assume without much doubt that Nazi Germany will be seen as pariah state by USA and British Commonwealth and subjected to similiar treatment as North Korea on world stage in the best option.
States that are treated as pariah never are big and tough nuclear superpowers. When the free world gets real notice and evidence of Nazi crimes, there is surely going to be a lot of outcry, fueling the fires of ongoing Cold War, but even as its worst, the Nazi Empire is *always* going to be given the reluctant respect fitting a superpower that even Stalinist Russia and Maoist China got at their worst. They would be too mighty to contemplate otherwise. North Korea is little, poor, backward, and if it really stepped out of bounds, it would be swiftly squished like a bug.
Also, it depends on when America and its allies get really aware of the Slav Holocaust, whether it's still ongoing, or 10, 20, 30 years after the fact. Mass murders discovered decades after the fact carry nowhere the same emotional impact.
The magnitude of such atrocity will probably also motive leaders of free world to engage in stronger alliances and possibly confederation of British Commonwealth with United States.
As I said upthreads, I expect such USA-Commonwealth confederation to happen anyway, as the effect of the geopolitical shock caused by Nazi victory and the downfall of Britain, regardless of Nazi atrocities.
Possibly also support for Pan-Asian confederation based on democratic China and India.
Hmm, such a Pan-Asian confederation looks a bit more utopistic than the Pan-Anglosphere one, for various reasons, not the least that China would be far from and India only peripheral to the Nazi sphere. However, a strong alliance of India with the Anglo Confederation is wholly likely, given that they might have the outskirts of the Nazi Empire at their doorstep. As it concerns China, its dealings with Japan are going to be of much more import, they were suffering their own invasion and genocide ongoing in the 1930s-1940s, but indeed if America supports the Chinese in their efforts to kick the Japanese out and quash the Communists, they shall join the American sphere eagerly.
Cut of from external markets and imports
They are going to be cut off from such only to the degree that the tides of Cold War antagonism and detente determinate, moral outrage is going to be a very limited factor here, history sadly teaches that embargoes motivated by moral outrage never really go anywhere.
However the economic system-which was just as in SU based on disregard for private property and state intervention-will be unable to compete with economies of what essentially will be a united world(with very few exceptions).
Your point about the economic system is wholly wrong. The economic system that the fascists practiced, for all its various faults, was basically a mixed economy, radically different from and much more effiicwent than the Soviet system, and rather more suited to sustain long-term competition with the democratic bloc.
In terms of science and technology Germany will be unable to compete as well-not only due to its ideological barriers but also to limited manpower to educate compared to its opponents.
Notwithstanding their terrible treatment of most Slavs, they are still going to have a fully educated manpower pool from the rest of Continental Europe, maybe Britain as well, and the Germanised Slavs and colonists. This is going to make them roughly the equal of EU plus one-third of Russia. I agree it's nowhere the equal of "Oceania" plus Chindia, but it's not wholly dwarfed, either, esp. since they can freely tap the resources of European Russia, the Middle East, and most of Africa.
While is difficult to estimate if it will collapse soon, its certain that German victory in WW2 will lead to impoverished, backward Europe, seen as hellhole on Earth and in eventual end of the Nazi regime(perhaps in late 70s) as provincial equivalent to our Third World countries and at best as South Africa today.
Hellhole, outside of the Eastern Europe abattoirs, and Third World status are outlandish exaggerations. Fascist economic system was nowhere as crappy as the Communist one, and even late Soviet Russia never fell so low. It is to be expected that they would be able to ensure reasonably satisfying affluence and a basically pleasant lifestyle to loyal citizens of their European core, esp. when stifling ideological mobilization winds down in late decades and if the regime goes the Chinese way and trades consumerist affluence and less intrusion of the state in personal life of loyal subjects for apolitical patriotism.
At the same time, North America and China(rebuilded as Europe was after WW2 with American money and investments) will be the main powers on the world stage, India behind them.
Ironic isn't it. That the Nazi would fight for glory of their perceived image of Europe, only to make it unimportant on the world stage eventually, and shift the center of civilization to Pacific.
This may well happen, but still (post-)Nazi Europe is going to be in rather better shape than (post-)Communist one in the end.