Best approach would be for Justinian to trust Belisarius, give him the troops needed to take Italy over without too much damage, and then let the good rep of Belisarius bring the Goths into the army, making up for the manpower spend in Africa and Italia. This would certainly change the reign of Justinian. If the rule of the Goths is based on B's good rep, then the plague could well be weathered on that. The larger manpower pool (if hit by the plague itself) would enable the Empire to expand further, solidify Africa, and move on to Spain in time. Just start with a decent army so that Belisarius can remain honest, good, and kind in the eyes of the Goths, and let that reputation buoy the Empire.
Best approach would be for Justinian to trust Belisarius, give him the troops needed to take Italy over without too much damage, and then let the good rep of Belisarius bring the Goths into the army, making up for the manpower spend in Africa and Italia. This would certainly change the reign of Justinian. If the rule of the Goths is based on B's good rep, then the plague could well be weathered on that. The larger manpower pool (if hit by the plague itself) would enable the Empire to expand further, solidify Africa, and move on to Spain in time. Just start with a decent army so that Belisarius can remain honest, good, and kind in the eyes of the Goths, and let that reputation buoy the Empire.
Or have Justinian not recover from the plague in 540, thence Belisarius becomes emperor and trusts himself.
The problem with that is that if Belisarius' successors aren't as honourable as he is, people will soon start to regret throwing their lot in with Constantinople. That's more or less what happened IOTL.
Step 12. Disband most of the Mediterranean fleet
Step 14. Appoint son as co-emperor and gradually withdraw from public life prior to death
Best approach would be for Justinian to trust Belisarius, give him the troops needed to take Italy over without too much damage, and then let the good rep of Belisarius bring the Goths into the army, making up for the manpower spend in Africa and Italia. This would certainly change the reign of Justinian. If the rule of the Goths is based on B's good rep, then the plague could well be weathered on that. The larger manpower pool (if hit by the plague itself) would enable the Empire to expand further, solidify Africa, and move on to Spain in time. Just start with a decent army so that Belisarius can remain honest, good, and kind in the eyes of the Goths, and let that reputation buoy the Empire.
Belisarius was a great military mind, but he would be an awful ruler. His interest and ability started and stopped at commanding armies. Given his record of alienating just about everyone else he worked with in Italy, I don't think he'd last long as an emperor, or be a particularly good one. Belisarius was perfect right where he was, as the right hand man of a capable emperor. Too bad Justinian repeatedly lost his trust in him.Or have Justinian not recover from the plague in 540, thence Belisarius becomes emperor and trusts himself.
Pirates don't suddenly materialize in the open sea. They need bases to raid from. Where are they going to do that? It's no coincidence piracy in the Roman Empire largely ceased once they had control of the entire Mediterranean coastline, even while their fleet sat in port most of the time.Get captured by pirates and realize that this was the dumbest decision of your life. Then try to imitate Caesar.
Belisarius would not become emperor nor would he be a particularly good one. The man did not have the political experience or contacts that Justinian had.Or have Justinian not recover from the plague in 540, thence Belisarius becomes emperor and trusts himself.
Not to mention, if he had the slightest ambition to become emperor, given all the opportunities Justinian provided him to justify an attempted usurpation, he would have tried IOTL. He never really had any interest in anything other than commanding armies.Belisarius would not become emperor nor would he be a particularly good one. The man did not have the political experience or contacts that Justinian had.
He was a good general but that's pretty much it.
Pirates don't suddenly materialize in the open sea. They need bases to raid from. Where are they going to do that? It's no coincidence piracy in the Roman Empire largely ceased once they had control of the entire Mediterranean coastline, even while their fleet sat in port most of the time.
Yet the Romans still maintained a fleet, because if they didn't have a fleet at all, their major port cities would become pirate bases.Pirates don't suddenly materialize in the open sea. They need bases to raid from. Where are they going to do that? It's no coincidence piracy in the Roman Empire largely ceased once they had control of the entire Mediterranean coastline, even while their fleet sat in port most of the time.
Yet the Romans still maintained a fleet, because if they didn't have a fleet at all, their major port cities would become pirate bases.
Not to mention, if he had the slightest ambition to become emperor, given all the opportunities Justinian provided him to justify an attempted usurpation, he would have tried IOTL. He never really had any interest in anything other than commanding armies.
Disbanding the fleet is, in such a situation, the best you can do to have pirates materialize on the seas. And even if you control the coast, you have to secure the islands too! Corsica, Sardinia, but also "little" islands like Elba can be used as bases for pirates without more ado.
As long as there's law and order and the government has the only army around (i.e. a monopoly on violence), piracy without a safe heaven would be more of a law enforcement than a military problem.