By Way of Constantinople - A Napoleonic Wars TL

Intro and Siege of Acre
In 1805, Napoleon asserted that if he had:

"been able to take Acre [in 1799], I would have put on a turban, I would have made my soldiers wear big Turkish trousers, and I would have exposed them to battle only in case of extreme necessity. I would have made them into a Sacred Battalion--my Immortals. I would have finished the war against the Turks with Arabic, Greek, and Armenian troops. Instead of a battle in Moravia, I would have won a Battle of Issus, I would have made myself emperor of the East, and I would have returned to Paris by way of Constantinople."

So what if he did just that?


As we know it, on March 20th, 1799, Napoleon marched upon Acre with a force of only 9,000. Yet, he was up against 30,000 Turkish troops. Seemingly impossible odds. Though this is not where our story begins, no. Instead, it begins a little over two weeks earlier, in the Siege of Jaffa, on the 3rd of March. When the city's inhabitants ruthlessly killed the messengers sent by Napoleon, demanding of the city's capitulation, Napoleon was infuriated. Upon the city's fall a mere 4 days later, on March 7th, Napoleon prevented his troops from ransacking the city, albeit he still executed Abdallah Bey, Turkish Governor of the region. Instead, Napoleon decided to honor the promises of his step son, Eugène de Beauharnais, that prisoners were to be spared. However, with such a large number of prisoners, potentially up to 4,000, Napoleon worried of the difficulties in keeping them in chains, unable to detach a guard to hold them, and unwanting to merely let them roam free. Instead, he would press many of them into service, forming a detachment of Albanian and Egyptian soldiers. These new conscripts, although unarmed, and merely workmen, would eventually be crucial for the success of the Armée d'Orient.

And so, this Napoleon arrived in Acre on March 22nd, 1799, with 9,000 troops and 4,000 unarmed workers. As Napoleon's army prepared for siege, the sight of their ethnic brothers seemingly helping the French heavily demoralized the mainly Albanian defenders of the siege, yet the capable defender of the city, Jezzar Pasha, refused to surrender. The odds looked increasingly difficult as A royal navy flotilla under one Commodore Sidney Smith begun to aid the city in its defense. Napoleon, well aware of the British's sea superiority after defeat Aboukir during the Battle of the Nile, had instead imposed his new conscripts to carry the siege artillery over land. Despite this, Napoleon would fail in his first assault on the city, now beginning to worry, as the anger of his forced conscripts could potentially lead to open revolt. Yet ironically, it was directly following this assault that the British line-of-battle ships, the Tigre and the Theseus laid into the French force during several Salvos, focused mainly on the French Siege artillery, the very same artillery that was mostly being operated by the Albanian and Egyptian conscripts. Ironically, the British had now turned the tide in favor of Napoleon. Soon the city's walls were breached, on April 7th. French troops, along with newly aligned Albanian and Egyptian soldiers, of whom had declared loyalty to Napoleon after British forces had fired upon them, stormed the city, destroying a partially built secondary wall the Ottomans were building. After a four-day bloody battle with remaining Ottoman Troops and a minor British presence, the city was secured.

While British ships remained firing on the city for several days, they soon withdrew. During this, the destruction wrought by the British had turned the population in favor of the French. During this, Napoleon received word from his his General, Jean Baptiste Kléber, that a large Ottoman force was camped at Mount Tabor, and Kleber was planning a night raid. Kleber's forces would engage the Ottoman force at dawn, after Kleber had misjudged how long it would take to reach the sleeping Ottomans. Forced into a potentially deadly situation, Kleber quickly formed two infantry squares, holding off numerous Ottoman offenses, until Napoleon arrived - at which point Kleber was nearly out of ammunition. Napoleon's force of over 10,000 having detached a portion at Acre and taking on his new recruits, arrived between the Ottoman forces and their encampment. Sending a small section of his force to destroy the Ottoman camp completely. Ottoman forces, now believing themselves surrounded began to retreat but were soon crushed between a dual charge between Kleber and Napoleon himself. The Ottoman retreat turned into a total route, with large portions of the force surrendering to Napoleon's army, and the rest scattered into the desert. Returning to Acre to rest for the night, Napoleon granted Kleber permission to form a Mameluks de la République, recruiting large portions of their former prisoners into the army.

And so, on April 18th, 1799, Napoleon dawned a Turban upon his head, granted Turkish Trousers to his original French force, and formed an elite column around his new force of the Mameluks de la République, now numbering 20,000 strong, and marched - to the now defenseless city of Damascus.

---

Some fun facts which helped inspire parts of this;

Jean Baptiste Kléber was one of the Greatest generals Napoleon had. There was a real Battle of Mount Tabor, however Napoleons relieving force only numbered 2,500 as opposed to his 10,000 here in this timeline. This battle resulted in 6,000 Turkish deaths and 500 Turkish prisoners. On the other hand only two Frenchmen laid dead, while only 60 were wounded in total.

The Mameluks de la République were a real force, composed originally of Mameluks and Syrian Janissaries ironically from the same battle of Acre that Napoleon lost IOTL. And it was composed by the very same Jean Baptiste Kléber, in September of that same year.

I figured these two little facts would help support some of the storyline, as well as ease any questions any people might have.

And Acre was won.png

Napoleon's territories in the Orient following the battle of Acre.
 
Last edited:
Now, the real question is what he'd claim to be in Constantinople. Considering the use of Constantinople, I could see Napoleon declaring himself Emperor of the Romans - He has a few to play with. As much as I know there are plenty who'd argue it wouldn't stand to scrutiny, but it doesn't need to. It needs to stand to gunpowder.

(Amusingly, although long expired, the French Kings also had a claim on those titles).

I do love the idea of a Neo-Roman Napoleonic Empire based in Constantinople. Especially as I could see Napoleon succeeding in taking over all the Ottoman and Roman Empires territories. Heck, throw in Alexanders to boot. I can't see a reason he wouldn't try. Just depends what he means by "Returning to Paris". Is he sailing a fleet? Marching through Italy?

I'm loving the premise, and I'm really excited to see where it goes!
 

trajen777

Banned
It would be interesting to see if he would support France or just carve out an empire there. I remember reading that his plan was just the empire there. So
1. Conquer the Ottoman empire -- declare the Roman Empire (the HRE dissolved in 1806)
2. Then would he go north to fight the HRE and try for 1 Roman empire (take Italy) then unite the empire ?
3. Stay in the New Roman (Ottoman) empire and expand into Persia etc -- bring revolutionary freedoms to this world (would people respond ?) Find a peace with AH and Russia -- or would this be a massive war that the AH and Russia and GB would never allow to exist ?
 
Ath this point in 1799, he's not even First Consul yet. Wouldn't that mean that, at least in the short term, he'd be setting up sister republics in the Ottoman territories?
 
I think he is going to make his own little kingdom, and "crown" himself Prince of the Levant or something.
 
Ath this point in 1799, he's not even First Consul yet. Wouldn't that mean that, at least in the short term, he'd be setting up sister republics in the Ottoman territories?

Napoleon was historically fascinated with the East. Historically he ruled as if he was a King in Egypt, and he had fully intended to become Emperor. A lot of his real-life rhetoric during the Egyptian campaign is such that he compares himself to Alexander the Great or even Muhammad. This desire to create an Empire in the east was so intense that during his short alignment wiht Russia, he had already begun preparations to divide and conquer the Ottoman Empire as well as an expedition into India. He loved Alexander the Great, and felt he was following in his footsteps. In addition - he and the Advisory were not only not in contact (having been seperated for quite awhile after losing his Fleet at the Battle of The Nile), but not on very good terms in the first place.
 
Napoleon was historically fascinated with the East. Historically he ruled as if he was a King in Egypt, and he had fully intended to become Emperor. A lot of his real-life rhetoric during the Egyptian campaign is such that he compares himself to Alexander the Great or even Muhammad. This desire to create an Empire in the east was so intense that during his short alignment wiht Russia, he had already begun preparations to divide and conquer the Ottoman Empire as well as an expedition into India. He loved Alexander the Great, and felt he was following in his footsteps. In addition - he and the Advisory were not only not in contact (having been seperated for quite awhile after losing his Fleet at the Battle of The Nile), but not on very good terms in the first place.

I agree with the general jist here. But, as long as he's playing the role of a good republican patriot, won't he likely organize his new conquests in a way that sounds amenable to republican principles? Its not like the sister republics of our history were anything but puppets anyway. Besides, you know he'd geek out on the opportunity to come up with as many classical sounding names for these sister republics as possible.
 
I agree with the general jist here. But, as long as he's playing the role of a good republican patriot, won't he likely organize his new conquests in a way that sounds amenable to republican principles? Its not like the sister republics of our history were anything but puppets anyway. Besides, you know he'd geek out on the opportunity to come up with as many classical sounding names for these sister republics as possible.
Phoenician Republic
Phrygian Republic
Pontic Republic
Lydian Republic
Republic of Cappadoce
Republic of Mesopotamia
Republic of Babylonia
Cilician Republic
And that's just in Asia...
 
Phoenician Republic
Phrygian Republic
Pontic Republic
Lydian Republic
Republic of Cappadoce
Republic of Mesopotamia
Republic of Babylonia
Cilician Republic
And that's just in Asia...

Bulgaria: Cisdanubian Republic
Romania: Transdanubian Republic
Greece: Hellenic Republic (drat)
Greater Constantinople: Bosphoran Republic
Albania: Epirote Republic

Any further west, and we're dealing with territories Napoleon already did rename.
 
Bulgaria: Cisdanubian Republic
Romania: Transdanubian Republic
Greece: Hellenic Republic (drat)
Greater Constantinople: Bosphoran Republic
Albania: Epirote Republic

Any further west, and we're dealing with territories Napoleon already did rename.

There should be a Macedonian Republic somewhere.
Maybe not Bosphoran but Thracian.
Also maybe an Armenian Republic.
 
Well, Russia's blood will be boiling at France doing what they been failing to do for all those years at taking Constantinople.

LOL, Napoleon takes Constantinople. It is roughly 1500 km from Damascus to Constantinople. 300 km further than Warsaw to Moscow. He is going to march through hostile terrain with no supplies,a limited artillery train, a very small trained force supplemented by local rabble, and at the end of the road cross the Dardanelles in the face of the Royal Navy with no ships to support him. Sure.
 
LOL, Napoleon takes Constantinople. It is roughly 1500 km from Damascus to Constantinople. 300 km further than Warsaw to Moscow. He is going to march through hostile terrain with no supplies,a limited artillery train, a very small trained force supplemented by local rabble, and at the end of the road cross the Dardanelles in the face of the Royal Navy with no ships to support him. Sure.

It is still Napoleon. And the title of the timeline is 'By Way of Constantinople'.
 
Top