JUst found out - I am tempted to be reliefed, not because his work was bad, but the factt that he was so sure to be right.
JUst found out - I am tempted to be reliefed, not because his work was bad, but the factt that he was so sure to be right.
TFSmith appears to be continuing the TL over at the NavWeapons forum
JUst found out - I am tempted to be reliefed, not because his work was bad, but the factt that he was so sure to be right.
JUst found out - I am tempted to be reliefed, not because his work was bad, but the factt that he was so sure to be right.
What he saidDon't grave dance.
Well I got an answer to this somewhere else.I was wondering but is the conflict in any way affecting the intervention in Dominica anyway?
Well I got an answer to this somewhere else.
"
Spain was in the middle of a bloody, costly, and ultimately failed four-year-long effort to conquer and reintegrate the Dominican Republic into the Spanish Empire; they'd been invited back in by the Dominican caudillo of the day, Pedro Santana, that at the high point included some 30,000 Spanish regulars, volunteers from Cuba and Puerto Rico, and 12,000 Dominican royalists, as well as a naval force of as many as 22 warships. This at a time when the Dominican population was estimated at between 200,000 and 300,000.
Ultimately, the Spanish withdrew after losing some 18,000 men in the space of roughly 52 months, while the Dominican rebels only lost 4,000 - which is another example of how poorly "European regulars" fared in expeditionary warfare in the Western Hemisphere in the 1860s, along with the French defeat in Mexico - which cost them 10,000 French, 3,000 European mercenaries, and 20,000 Mexican royalists."
Will he be continuing the thread somewhere?