For those unaware, the DuMont Network and Mutual Broadcasting were the original underdogs of television and radio broadcasting respectively. DuMont was the original 4th Television Network, competing against the likes of ABC, CBS and NBC with strongholds in city markets like New York, Pittsburgh and Washington. Meanwhile Mutual Broadcasting was the radio underdog that while having the largest number of affiliates had the least money to show for it, leaving it in the dust when the other big radio networks (ABC, CBS, NBC) went hard into television expansion after World War 2.
Both companies lost the fight around the same time (1956 / 1957), and went on to be memories in the history of broadcasting. But suppose that they'd reached out to each other at some point realizing their situations and undertook a merger to make their respective fields all that much stronger? Would it have made a difference? Would it have only killed them quicker?
Both companies lost the fight around the same time (1956 / 1957), and went on to be memories in the history of broadcasting. But suppose that they'd reached out to each other at some point realizing their situations and undertook a merger to make their respective fields all that much stronger? Would it have made a difference? Would it have only killed them quicker?