NIK PARMEN
Banned
What's the consequences? no enlightment? no French revoluton? a US more like Canada?
Without the loss of the Americans, I suppose the Brits keep some of their ballsier attitudes in the Union.wow that is a really disproportionality large union jack compared to the WHOLE BUILDING.
If the UK had won then in the future Spain might have had to make a deal with the UK. which they sort of actually did with the US. Also think the UK. would have been less agressive in negotiations since the UK. was in europe. US needed to be more agressive since they were in the Americas and next to all these territories.
Looking at the map, all of Oregon North of the 42 parallel would be UK.. But the line would continue all the way East via the Louisiana territory up to Illinois. So the Northern Louisiana territory would be UK.. Since the UK. would control most of the east side of the Mississippi river they would also want to control at least the east bank of the mouth of the Mississippi. So Spain might also have to give up New Orleans which was on the East side of the river.
Spain might be able to keep the florida Peninsula from Pensacola going East. West of Pensacola to the city of New Orleans would be UK.
If the colonial rebellion of 1775 is put down then the Florida Peninsula remains British, which it had been since 1763. I wonder if/how-long Louisiana might remain in Spanish hands in such a TL?
If the UK had won then in the future Spain might have had to make a deal with the UK. which they sort of actually did with the US. Also think the UK. would have been less agressive in negotiations since the UK. was in europe.
What's the consequences? no enlightment? no French revoluton? a US more like Canada?
Without the loss of the Americans, I suppose the Brits keep some of their ballsier attitudes in the Union.
"So wha' it's big!? Guess wha' else's big!? Our f**kin' Dominion, that's wha'! Bugger off ya' Scot lovin' wanker!"
Those were, contrary to common perception, no mercenaries.Would Britain have wanted to win? To maintain an active army with various mercenary contingents to pacify people fellow anglo-saxons.
Those were, contrary to common perception, no mercenaries.
Those were, contrary to common perception, no mercenaries.
Interesna. How so?
Those were allied troops put under British command. Really not different than the contributions of several smaller states to Iraq and Afghanistan these days, many of which also get paid handsomely for doing so, just like Hesse-Kassel was. The difference really is that it were official troops of a souvereign state, instead of private troops offering their service - the latter is what mercenaries are.
Union: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland (Act of Union, 1801)This makes no sense.
You're newbishness in this area allows you to fail at comprehending the internetz.This is anti-sense. A piece the size of a penny can actually destory Belgium.
Seriously: what are you trying to say???