Last edited:
Update time :).



Chapter VI: The War of the Habsburg Inheritance and the War of the Lublin Confederation, 1745-1750.

In March 1745, Archduke of Austria and King of Bohemia (as Charles II), and King of Hungary and Croatia (as Charles III) died, aged 59. Four years before the birth of Maria Theresa, faced with his lack of male heirs, Charles provided for a male-line succession failure with the Pragmatic Sanction of 1713. He thereby favoured his own daughters over those of his elder brother and predecessor, Joseph I, in the succession, ignoring the decree he had signed during the reign of his father, Leopold I. The reason for this was that his niece Maria Amalia of Austria was married to Holy Roman Emperor Charles VI, the successor of Maximilian II Emanuel, Holy Roman Emperor and King of Bavaria. A Wittelsbach stood to inherit the thrones of Austria, Bohemia, Hungary and Croatia until he issued the Pragmatic Sanction, which at the time had been accepted by Bavaria because Louis XIV hadn’t been interested in a war over the matter. Ultimately, Bavaria, Great Britain, Savoy, Saxony, Denmark, the DutchRepublic, the Papal States, Prussia, Spain, Venice and the Diet of the Holy Roman Empire recognized the sanction.

Bavaria was the first to renege on its recognition of the Pragmatic Sanction, refusing to recognize Maria Theresa as the Habsburg heir. In May 1745, a large Bavarian army of 70.000 men commanded personally by Holy Roman Emperor Charles VI moved into Tyrol to defend his wife’s legitimate claims to the Habsburg inheritance. He vanquished an Austrian army of only 33.000 near Innsbruck on May 10th and kicking off the War of the Habsburg Inheritance. The Archbishops of Salzburg and the Bishops of Brixen, Passau, Augsburg and Trent – all appointed by the King of Bavaria since the War of the Spanish Succession, and bordering Habsburg lands – supported Bavaria with troops, allowing them to cut off Tyrol from the rest of Austria. Regensburg and Freising, neutral until then, followed and provided more troops. It looked like the Bavarians would be able to take Vienna since Austrian forces arrayed against them were numerically inferior, and more so because they enjoyed Ottoman support. The mere possibility of the Ottomans moving on Hungary meant that the Habsburgs could never focus their undivided attention on the Bavarians. Over the course of May and June the Bavarians won several skirmishes against the Austrians and inflicted another decisive defeat in the Battle of Gmunden on June 18th 1745. At this point Sultan Mahmud I, the successor and nephew of Ahmed III, moved an army to the Hungarian border, not to invade but to stoke rebellion among the Hungarians.

The War of the Habsburg Inheritance changed from a localized conflict to a larger one when King Frederick II of Prussia intervened on behalf of the Habsburgs in July. He didn’t have any love for the Habsburgs, but he believed the absorption of their lands by Bavaria would decide the Bavarian-Prussian rivalry over dominance in the Holy Roman Empire in Prussia’s disadvantage. The resources and manpower Bavaria would get by absorbing Austria, Bohemia, Hungary and Croatia would unavoidably stack the deck against Prussia so much that it’d have to play second fiddle, at least without outside backing. Frederick, however, pretty much correctly assessed that Prussia’s allies weren’t so close and concordant that they’d go to war for him, unless there was something to gain for them too. Just propping up Prussia against Bavaria out of principle, because they were allies, wasn’t good enough. Prussia couldn’t rely on its allies to back them up against a superior Bavaria (and didn’t want to be dependent), so they had to prevent Bavaria from becoming superior. Prussian participation would turn it into a European conflict.

Prussia’s intervention triggered Bavaria’s alliance with France. France declared war on Prussia in late July and Spain did the same, bound by alliance as well as family ties (King Philip V of Spain was the younger brother of Louis XV). Elector Frederick Augustus II of Saxony followed suit. He wanted to take back Lusatia, which Saxony had lost in the Great Northern War and was encouraged by French and Spanish participation (besides that, the Elector’s daughter Maria Amalia of Saxony was daughter-in-law to Philip V by virtue of her marriage to the future King Ferdinand VI Spain and sister-in-law to his younger brother, the future Charles IV of Spain). Great Britain traditionally opposed continental hegemony and did the same now, looking at the bigger picture: by going against the Bourbon Franco-Spanish alliance they weren’t just trying to stop Bavaria’s attempt to take over Central Europe, but they were trying to prevent France from spreading its influence all the way across southern Germany into the Balkans via the Bavarians, linking up with its Ottoman allies. Needless to say, Great Britain entered the war on Prussia’s side. In 1746, Russian Empress Elizabeth decided to fight a new war against the Ottoman Empire, invading Wallachia and Moldova, resulting in a declaration of war from France. Sweden declared war on Prussia in 1746 too, honouring its commitments to Bavaria and France, but incurring a Russian declaration of war in response. By 1746 Europe had been set ablaze.

Notably, the Dutch Republic remained neutral. The Dutch realized that by opposing France in the War of the Spanish Succession they had risked being annexed completely, which Louis XIV had planned to do next if the war had continued any longer. France had grown into a giant right on the doorstep of the Dutch and could still extinguish their independence if it wanted to. After the War of the Spanish Succession, the Dutch abandoned their alliance with Britain and the Habsburgs. They instead opted for a course of strict neutrality and not challenging their more powerful neighbour in foreign politics while maintaining their national sovereignty. Due to their economic decline and corresponding decreased military strength, while France had only grown stronger, they felt they had little choice but to become the inconspicuous wallflower among the European powers.

In the meantime, on July 25th 1745, a Prussian army of 33.000 men commanded personally by Frederick II advanced into Bohemia and met an army of 40.000 Bavarians commanded by Prince Ferdinand Maria, the brother of Holy Roman Emperor Charles VI. Superficially, the odds definitely favoured the latter, but there was more to it than numbers: under King Frederick William I, Frederick II’s predecessor, the Prussian army had been drilled to a level of perfection previously unknown in Europe. The infantry was able to fire four shots a minute to the Bavarians’ three; the cavalry and artillery were comparatively less effective, but still above average. Frederick II feigned a retreat in his centre after the enemy artillery bombardment had focused there, making Ferdinand Maria think the enemy was buckling. He became overconfident and ordered most of his entire cavalry into the enemy centre, upon which the trap shut and Frederick’s troops massacred the Bavarian cavalry in enfilading artillery and musket fire. The Prussian victory gave the Habsburgs a breather: Charles VI sent reinforcements north to aid his brother’s chaotically retreating army while sending messengers asking Louis XV to hurry. In the meantime, the Saxons sat on their hands and did nothing.

Louis had kept 60.000 of his 200.000 man army in reserve and split the remaining 140.000 into three armies. An army of 25.000 assembled near Brussels under the command of Maurice, Count of Saxony, and advanced through the (officially neutral) Prince-Bishopric of Liège (unsurprising since the French king appointed the Prince-Bishop). He seized the isolated Duchy of Cleves and County of Mark from Prussia, encountering no major resistance. Maurice hoped to march on the Duchy of Brunswick-Lüneburg, tied in personal union to Great Britain and the ancestral home of King George II. The French were pushing the Saxons to do the same from the east, knocking out Britain’s continental base, after which the French and the Saxons could devote their full attention on the Prussians (Austria by itself wasn’t a major challenge). Saxony, however, didn’t go for it. The Bavarians were expected to beat Prussia and Austria with French reinforcements. To that end, the main army of 80.000 men commanded personally by King Louis XV advanced eastward from Lorraine, thought it wasn’t expected to arrive before autumn, by which time the campaigning season would be pretty much over. As it turned out, the French arrived in time to help the Bavarians resist Prussia’s blitz invasion of Upper Austria of September 1745, which quickly ground to a halt in the face of a 2:1 numerical superiority, despite the tactical genius of the Prussian king. The latter feigned a collapse of his left flank, which had been made weak on purpose, to lure the French into a trap, destroying part of their army. Louis was surprised and frustrated about the losses the Prussians managed to inflict on his army, but was no fool and didn’t rush to take revenge. His bloody nose taught him not to underestimate his foe.

The third component of France’s stratagem was an army of 35.000 men commanded by Ulrich Lowendal, which moved to secure the Duchy of Milan, which was under French control. It was intended to further increase French influence over northern France. From Milan, Lowendal supported the Duchy of Parma, which was under Spanish suzerainty and was being administrated by Philip V’s second son, the future Charles IV of Spain. Duke Francesco III of Modena also supported France and Spain and Lucca joined them since the French looked certain to win (Genoa and Savoy remained neutral). Together they faced the Grand Duchy of Tuscany ruled by the house of Habsburg-Lorraine, which was largely cut off from Austrian support (Venice was neutral, making it difficult for Austria to help Tuscany; they were unwilling to force Venice to let their armies pass through, fearing the Venetians would side with France). To make matters worse for Tuscany a Spanish-Neapolitan army of 33.000 men advanced north through the Papal States, which were supposed to be neutral.

King Philip V of Spain had bullied Pope Benedict XIV, who wasn’t particularly pro-Bourbon, into letting his army pass through Papal territories. He was highly sceptical about French and Spanish claims to be the “defenders of the Church” given their alliance to the Ottoman Empire. Relations with the Vatican were also strained due to Gallicanism: the notion that national customs might trump Catholic Church regulations. This expressed itself in the habit of Louis XIV to appoint bishops and archbishops, a practice which the two brothers Louis XV and Philip V happily continued. Despite its reservations, Rome had no choice but to let the Spanish-Neapolitan army pass through unmolested. By November 1745, the Grand Duchy of Tuscany was under occupation and Grand Duke Francis Stephen, Maria Theresa’s husband, had fled to Austria.

Tuscany was subsequently partitioned: the exclaves of Pontremoli and Bagnone were annexed by adjacent Duchy of Parma; the exclaves of Fivizzano and Barga were awarded to the Duchy of Modena; another exclave, Pietrasanta, was annexed by the Republic of Lucca; the last tiny exclave of Tuscany, Badia Tedalda, was awarded to the Papal States as recompense for the Spanish-Neapolitan violation of their neutrality. The remainder, the lion’s share of the Grand Duchy of Tuscany, ended up ender the suzerainty of Spain, which became the dominant power in Italy. Separate from the war, France also got some expansion in the region by taking Corsica off Genoa’s hands; Genoese rule over Corsica had been plagued by endemic rebellion for nearly twenty years, so in 1748 they decided to take the French up on their offer to buy the island. With Corsica and Tuscany under their rule, the Bourbons had completed their dominance over the western Mediterranean Sea.

In the meantime, hostilities in Europe took off again in the spring of 1746 and the starting positions were advantageous for France, Spain and Bavaria. The Franco-Bavarian army by itself was numerically superior to the armies fielded by Prussia and Austria. Besides that, France and Spain had already won the Italian campaign by conquering Tuscany, enabling them to threaten Austria from the south, assuming they were willing to bribe and/or bully Venice into compliance, which they were perfectly willing to do. They promised Venice some minor border corrections at Austria’s expense: the County of Gorizia sufficed. The Venetians agreed and opened up another front against Austria in May 1746, which was soon bolstered by Franco-Spanish reinforcements. The Alpine landscape made for an easy defence on the part of the Austrians, but it increased pressure on them and forced them to divert some troops away from their fight against Franco-Bavarian forces further north.

Russia was too preoccupied fighting Sweden and the Ottomans at the same time to assist Prussia, but they used their sway over the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth in order to compel it to join the war. Its ruler Michael II, King of Poland and Grand Duke of Lithuania, reluctantly agreed. Michael II was Michal Fryderyk Czartoryski, the oldest son of Casimir V, who had successfully established a hereditary succession. No matter how feeble it was, that was a feat in itself since there hadn’t been a father-son succession since the end of the Jagiellonian dynasty. Michael II, however, realized that the tentative establishment of a hereditary monarchy and a centralization of the state were the result of Russia and Prussia backing him up against the nobility. The nobles, willing to defend their excessive autonomy and power, were ready to rebel at a moment’s notice if the opportunity arose. Michael II went to war because Russia and Prussia threatened to withdraw their support if he didn’t. Unbeknownst to him, their ability to support him was already largely gone because they were fully committed to the war. A Polish army moved into Bohemia to support the Prussians and the Austrians.

King Frederick II again confronted King Louis XV, this time on May 26th in the Battle of Cham in the Upper Palatinate, Bavaria. Frederick commanded 46.000 of his own Prussians, another 22.000 Poles and a small Russian contingent of 10.000 men, facing a French army of 75.000 men and without Bavarian assistance (most Bavarian forces had been redirected to the Austrian heartlands to exploit the dispersal of Habsburg forces as a result of the Ottoman threat and Venice joining the war). This battle was part of Frederick’s plan to directly attack Bavaria.

Louis XV assessed that Frederick II was a very capable as well as aggressive military leader and planned a trap of his own. Their armies were of roughly equal match so a full frontal assault wouldn’t do the trick. He reasoned that that would just devolve into a slogging match or that it could turn bad because the opposing army was slightly larger. The town of Cham lay on the river Regen, a left tributary of the Danube, in the Cham-Further lowland, bordered on the south by the Bavarian Forest and on the north by the Oberpfälzer woods. Louis XV utilized the features of the Bavarian Forest, a wooded low-mountain area, to his advantage. As bait, he set up an encampment of 20.000 men near Cham on the right bank of the Regen River protected by an earth wall with a palisade on top. The other 55.000 troops under his command would stay on the high ground of the Bavarian Forest with the woods to their rear; the tough forested terrain made it difficult for them to be attacked in their rearguard. The encampment at Cham was bait and the troops there were to provide only brief resistance before retreating to the foothills of the BavarianForest, where artillery batteries with overlapping fields of fire had been set up on the high ground. When Frederick arrived and noticed a much smaller enemy army he indeed attacked and pursued aggressively and then encountered Louis’s main force. He realized he’d fallen into a trap when his army got pummelled by artillery, with cannonballs tearing through his ranks. He knew better than to attack a force holding the high ground and ordered the retreat, suffering serious but not crippling losses in the process. He’d been beaten but not broken.

In the meantime, in the northern theatre of the war, the campaigning season saw the confrontation between Sweden and Russia. Sweden had invested heavily in its defences but also its army with help from France and, unlike in the Great Northern War, the Swedes weren’t alone in this. The Ottomans were putting up a serious defence, having built a string of fortresses designed by French architects to defend their borders. The Russians were heavily committed in the Balkans and in the Crimea as a result and in naval terms they weren’t having an easy time of it either thanks to Ottoman investment in their navy, partially funded by France. As a result the young King Gustav III Adolf was optimistic and ordered a joint operation by the army and the fleet against Vyborg, which fell into Swedish hands very quickly, defeating a force under the command of General Peter Lacy. A Swedish army of 50.000 men commanded personally by the young king advanced further to St. Petersburg, but had to stop and set up their winter camp because winter came early.

1746 ended without a decisive victory for anybody, but something was stirring in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Poland’s nobles were fine with a home-grown dynasty, but resented the centralization and bureaucratization of the administration and the growth of the royal army since it completely undermined their power. Besides that, they were opposed to the way Russia and Prussia dictated Poland-Lithuania’s foreign policy and, to a certain extent, even its domestic policies. They were being treated like vassals or even a protectorate and that was unacceptable! The war, in which Poland-Lithuania stood to gain nothing, was the latest example of this. The wealthy magnates wanted to pull out of it and regain their influence by forcing intermediary of organs staffed by nobles onto the King to affect how the country was run. In a meeting in Lublin in June 1747 they organized a confederation – a legal military association opposing the government on the grounds of unjust rule – and launched a rebellion against King Michael II. This was the Rebellion of the Lublin Confederation, which was led by Karol Stanislaw Radziwill, the wealthiest magnate of Poland in the second half of the eighteenth century. The Radziwill family was opposed to reform and, besides that, had been the nemesis of the Czartoryski family for a long time.

King Michael II turned around and marched his army straight back to Poland to save his throne, abandoning the Prussians. Prussia and Russia were now confronted by a country in chaos in between them, stretching from the Vistula to the river Dnieper. Besides that, Prussia was outnumbered by the Bavarians and the French without Polish reinforcements to supplement their army. Moreover, Prussia and Russia had to consider the distinct possibility of Poland-Lithuania switching sides to shake off their influence. Spies had told them Radziwill and his co-conspirators had already established contacts with France, Sweden and Bavaria to gain their support. This was confirmed when they elected Franz Ludwig, Count of Holnstein, the illegitimate son of Holy Roman Emperor Charles VI, as King of Poland and Grand Duke of Lithuania.

In the meantime, without Polish support, King Frederick II was no longer able to keep the Bavarians and the French from marching into Vienna, which they did in June 1747. With the over Habsburg lands winding down, the War of the Lublin Confederation commenced. The Prussian army withdrew into its fortresses in Silesia, taking up a defensive posture. Simultaneously, distracted by events in Poland, Russia had trouble keeping the Swedes and the Ottomans at bay simultaneously. Gustav III Adolf, who proved to be a military genius comparable to his father, the famous Charles XII, captured St. Petersburg. Some were urging him to invade Russia and attack Moscow too, to where Empress Elizabeth had relocated her court, but the young Swedish king knew better. If he advanced on Moscow, the Russians would simply withdraw further and sap his army’s strength through scorched earth tactics. Russia was too big to invade so he decided to stay encamped outside St. Petersburg with his army to await the Russian response, setting up an earth wall with a palisade in defence.

In high level talks between Prussia and Russia, Frederick II urged Empress Elizabeth to give the Swedes what they wanted in return for dropping out of the war and then focus on Poland-Lithuania. Russia, however, wouldn’t make peace with the Swedes without at least retaking St. Petersburg and save some face. Therefore, General Lacy launched a counterattack in August with an army twice the size of Gustav’s, retaking the city with heavy losses; besides that, Russia had to abandon its gains in Wallachia and Moldova to make this possible. Swedish success had come at losses they could barely afford while the Russians had men to spare, so they accepted the Russian peace offer, much to the outrage of France and Bavaria: by the Treaty of Abo Sweden regained the parts of Karelia, Kexholm and Vyborg they had lost in the Great Northern War. Russia saved face by keeping their capital and Sweden was allowed to linger on as a member of the great power club. It was a short term success, but a long term loss for the Swedes: France and its allies wouldn’t so readily help them in another confrontation against the Russians, and it was not a matter of if but when that confrontation would occur.

In the meantime, Russia could devote its attention to Poland-Lithuania, using the freed up forces to invade Poland-Lithuania from the east. Prussia remained on the defence in Silesia while also sending an army in to put down the Lublin Confederation. France supported the Krakow Confederation through Hungary, which was under occupation by French and Bavarian forces. They were, however, at the far end of a long supply line and were tired after several years of fighting and couldn’t really help the Poles. In the meantime, King Michael II was killed in battle, which was convenient for Prussia and Russia, which had plans to deal with the troublesome Poles definitively. The Lublin Confederation fell apart when their provisional capital of Lublin was conquered and their leader Karol Stanislaw Radziwill fled to France with as much of his enormous fortune as he could take with him to avoid certain execution. He would live a life in comfort in a modest estate outside Paris, watched powerlessly how his country was carved up by the victors and died an embittered but very wealthy man in 1790.

In the Treaty of Breslau Prussia and Russia divided the Commonwealth’s territories in an arrangement that preserved a semblance of Polish and Lithuanian autonomy. Russia directly annexed the vovoideships of Kiev, Volhynia, Podolia and Braclaw and Empress Elizabeth claimed the title Grand Duchess of Lithuania. Lithuania was thusly tied in personal union to the Russian crown, theoretically a separate country with its own institutions and laws but in practice less than a vassal. In St. Petersburg a “Lithuanian Prikaz” (a judicial, territorial and executive office) was set up that effectively ran the country. Prussia directly annexed the Chelmno, Inowroclaw and Kalisz vovoideships while the title King of Poland fell to Frederick II. Much like the Russians, Frederick created a “Polish chancellery” for all of his Polish affairs while government institutions in Warsaw merely became executive bodies. Frederick II visited his Polish kingdom a handful of times and Elizabeth never visited Lithuania at all.

In the meantime, the British had contributed little to the war in Europe other than financing and supplying its continental allies Prussia, Russia and Austria. At sea, however, they had done the lion’s share of the fighting, the most crucial confrontation being the Battle of Oléron on July 9th 1746. France fully intended to invade Great Britain, not to conquer the British Isles – for which they lacked the manpower due to their involvement in the fighting on the continent – but to get them to leave the war. When the British heard rumours of the French and Spanish fleets converging, the Royal Navy immediately set sail to prevent that, but struggled with unfavourable winds. The Royal Navy deployed 29 ships of the line and six frigates while the French fleet assembling at Oléron, an island in the Bay of Biscay, had 22 ships of the line and five frigates. A big battle ensued in which the French had favourable winds while the British had numbers, which they used to turn the slogging match to their advantage. The Royal Navy’s delay, however, meant that a Spanish flotilla of eight ships of the line and three frigates arrived at the peak of the battle, providing fresh reinforcements to the French. The Royal Navy lost six ships of the line, the French lost five and the Spanish lost two frigates, making the battle inconclusive at best. The naval balance of power remained the same, but the French decided to put off the invasion of Britain nonetheless, ultimately making it a British victory.

Besides the seas, the other major theatre where British and French forces clashed was India, where Governor-General Joseph-François, Marquis Dupleix, led French forces to victory. His ambition now was to acquire for France vast territories in India, and for this purpose he entered into relations with the native princes, and adopted a style of oriental splendour in his dress and surroundings. He built an army of native troops, called sepoys, who were trained as infantrymen men in his service. The British took the alarm (the danger to their settlements and power was partly averted by the bitter mutual jealousy which existed between Dupleix and Bertrand François Mahé de La Bourdonnais, French governor of the Isle of Bourbon). Dupleix’s forces seized control of Madras and also of Fort St. David near Cuddalore. This situation barely changed until peace negotiations finally started in 1750 after five years of war on a global scale and two million deaths.
 
Last edited:
Update time!


Chapter VII: The Peace of Louis XVI, 1750-1774.

After five years all the major European powers tired of fighting and both sides had made serious territorial gains, allowing all of them to call it quits and say they won. The main goal the war had started over – namely keeping the Wittelsbachs from inheriting the Habsburg possessions – hadn’t been achieved by Prussia, Britain, Russia and their allies. Emperor Charles VI had died in 1748, only two years short of victory. His son Holy Roman Emperor Maximilian IV (King of Bavaria as Maximilian III Joseph) was only 23 by the end of the war. He was the first ruler of the House of Wittelsbach-Habsburg and could be very satisfied, starting his reign with a massive territorial expansion. Prussia and Russia had divided Poland while Britain had made some colonial gains in the new world that amounted to their “victory.”

The precise territorial changes were hammered out in the Treaty of Amsterdam, a locale chosen because the Dutch offered to mediate as neutral arbiters. Stadtholder William IV, Prince of Orange, liked to see Holland it that way since it meant his country was still very important in foreign politics. In reality, however, the Dutch just hosted the negotiations and had little influence on peace talks that amounted to little more than horse trading; besides that, they couldn’t really go against their powerful French neighbour. At most, Dutch negotiators shuttled between the various foreign delegations to confer the other side’s proposals.

In Europe, territorial changes were as follows. France annexed the Duchy of Cleves and the County of Mark, expanding their influence in Germany and further surrounding the DutchRepublic with French territory. In Italy, Spain gained the lion’s share of the Grand Duchy of Tuscany while allies like Modena, Parma, Lucca and even the officially neutral Papal States got some morsels (France had gotten its expansion by buying Corsica off Genoa, independently from the war). Venice got the Duchy of Gorizia. Bavaria again gained the most relative to its size, nearly tripling in size: it gained the Kingdom of Bohemia (and its electoral vote), the Archduchy of Austria, the Duchy of Styria, the Duchy of Carinthia, the Duchy of Carniola and the Ob der Enns region (for the first time Bavaria gained access to the sea, establishing a small naval base at Trieste based on remaining Austrian ships). Maximilian IV inherited them through his Habsburg mother – Maria Amalia of Austria, who was the daughter of Habsburg ruler Joseph I – and would pass on Bavaria as well as the Habsburg inheritance to his successor. A rump Kingdom of Hungary gained its “independence” and the Ottomans put Hungarian nobleman Joseph Rakoczi on the throne as their puppet.

Colonial changes were seemingly limited: Florida passed from Spain to Britain while in India France annexed Madras and Cuddalore (afterwards, France managed to turn Hyderabad into a protectorate, extending its influence over much of southern and central India). France also signed an alliance with Mysore – a kingdom in southern India which resisted the British as well as the Maratha Empire – that reached the zenith of its power in the second half of the eighteenth century. The French expanded their influence at the court of the Nawab of Bengal as well, though not to the point of an official alliance, and increased their trading activity there. France also exercised influence over India through Dutch governorates in Ceylon, Coromandel, Malabar, Bengal and Suratte (the Dutch had little choice in the matter). All-in-all, French influence in India expanded significantly and provided serious competition to the British.

In the meantime, Prussian and Russian gains in Eastern Europe were confirmed. Russia directly annexed the vovoideships of Kiev, Volhynia, Podolia and Braclaw and Empress Elizabeth claimed the title Grand Duchess of Lithuania, tying it in personal union to Russia. Prussia directly annexed the Chelmno, Inowroclaw and Kalisz vovoideships while the title King of Poland befell Frederick II. The Russians also desired Wallachia and Moldova, but didn’t get them because the Ottomans still controlled the region, leaving plenty of room for another conflict between Russia and the Sublime Porte.

Louis XV had conducted tremendous reforms in his country in the spirit of the Enlightenment Era, mostly in the first two decades of his reign. There was the introduction of a civil code. Secondly, he had granted regional autonomy through the provincial assemblies, which took care of education, healthcare and law and order among other things. Thirdly, he had established the Royal Assembly. Granted, it was an advisory and executive rather than a legislative body. He had, however created a precedent of setting policy in consultation and cooperation with this body and allowing it to present him with suggestions and/or petitions on legislative matters, giving it a pseudo-parliamentary nature. Taxes imposed on those desiring a seat in the Royal Assembly for the first time led to a situation in which nobles and clergymen were being taxed, providing additional funds for the state. The professionalized and more efficient bureaucracy allowed for the government to be smaller, freeing up additional funds. The second part of his reign had been encompassed by foreign policy issues, particularly bolstering the Ottomans to expand French influence in the Mediterranean. His foreign policy had ultimately led to a major war, leading to fairly quick success instead of the wave of exhaustive wars of his predecessor that had provided piecemeal victories (apart from his coup de grace, the War of the Spanish Succession). His gains may not have been as large as those of his grandfather – like putting a Bourbon dynast on the throne of a European great power – but they had been achieved after only one major war. This war had been preceded by an unprecedented period of relative peace that had lasted nearly forty years, leading to strong economic growth. He left France in better shape than he’d found it, leaving some big shoes to fill.

In 1754, Louis XV suddenly died of a stroke, aged 72, and was succeeded by his third son (his first two sons had died of convulsions and measles respectively at a young age). At the age of 44 he became King Louis XVI of France while his 36 year-old wife and cousin Mariana Victoria of Spain became Queen-Consort.[1] Louis XVI together with his brother-in-law and cousin Ferdinand VI of Spain (who had succeeded Philip V in 1746 after a 44 year reign) together ruled the Bourbon family compact in a period of peace after the wars over the Habsburg inheritance and the partition of Poland-Lithuania. Ferdinand VI died in 1759 aged 46 and was succeeded by his brother, who became King Charles IV of Spain.

Louis XVI introduced more reforms. The precedent set by his father by having noblemen and clergymen (as well as members of the bourgeoisie) pay for the privilege of being in the Royal Assembly was expanded upon. After five years of war that had cost France roughly 200.000 lives, there was a budget deficit once again. Moreover, the economy entered a depression after a speculative economic bubble (involving the increased cotton trade with France’s enlarged holdings in India) burst. King Louis XVI introduced a tax on the twentieth of all revenues that affected the privileged classes as well as the commoners. The nobility as well as the clergy, normally exempt from taxes, responded with violent protest against this, but the King had no intention of bowing to their pressure. He ensured that the nobility and the clergy remained divided by increasing the responsibilities and powers of the provincial assemblies and the Royal Assembly, particularly in the fields of religion, education, medical relief and public welfare. In return, their members (nobles and clergymen, but also wealthy commoners) helped to suppress dissent. In the most serious incident, taking place in Orléans, the royal artillery was needed to disperse a band of nobles attempting to instigate another Fronde. The “twentieth tax” was successfully introduced and bolstered state finances, allowing it to alleviate the effects of the economic crisis, among others through charitable works, making the new King very popular with the mob. Besides that, the new tax was used to accumulate funds for future wars.

Louis XVI continued his reforms and played the mob, stating “the mob holds the power, but fortunately the common man doesn’t realize that. He who can play the crowd can harness its power and no noble title, no deed of ownership, no amount of money and no walled-off estate can stop it.” Besides that he was genuinely concerned for his subjects, though sometimes he thought he knew better what his subjects wanted than they did. In that spirit, Louis XVI abolished serfdom in 1757, making France one of the first countries in Europe to do so. He did so without compensation to their owners, who for several years now had actually been paying taxes, to the resentment of some (though others were bright enough to go along with it for more political influence). The aristocracy and clergy – though agitated and in some cases irate about this major reform – were too weak and divided to stop it, besides the fact that the bourgeoisie wasn’t on their side. State-owned serfs were emancipated in 1762. Louis justified himself to his nobles by saying “it is better to emancipate the serfs from above than to one day have them rise up from below.” Slavery was not abolished, therefore not affecting the bourgeoisie, Jews and Huguenots who were heavily involved in the slave trade.

The peasantry, needless to say, was elated. The peasants, and other non-nobles, were also overjoyed when their King abolished the taille (a direct land tax imposed upon the peasantry and non-nobles). His seeming genuine concern for his subjects, exemplified by charity, earned him the reputation of being a saint due to the combination with his public piety. He was mostly just pious to the outside world, regarding religion as a means to achieve social stability. In reality, he rejected revelation and authority as sources of religious knowledge and also rejected things like trinity, biblical inerrancy and supernatural explanations of miracles. He believing reason and observation of the natural world were sufficient to determine the existence of a single creator of the universe. In short, he was a deist, though opponents wrongly accused him of being atheist. His attitudes toward religion and science corresponded to his general personality, which was a cerebral, intellectual one.

He was, therefore, at odds with the Catholic Church. The problem was solved because of the fact that Bourbon Spain controlled Naples and Tuscany. If a Pope became too troublesome, the Bourbons could take the Papal States and no-one would be able to help the Holy See. This, in turn, would lead to new Papal elections, which could potentially lead to a schism in the Catholic Church. To avoid this, Clement XIII and successive Popes alternated between not challenging Franco-Spanish foreign policy and (unsuccessfully) trying to drive a wedge between France and Spain. If there was to be another “Road to Canossa” as in 1077, then it would be reversed: the Pope would have to prostrate himself before the worldly monarch instead of the other way around. Clement XIII and his successors were wise enough to not let it get that far.

Louis’s personal morals also exemplified his less than pious attitude: he entertained several mistresses, fathering nine surviving illegitimate children with four different longstanding mistresses. Like his great-grandfather, he recognized most of his bastards and bestowed noble titles on them and arranged marriages, but didn’t give them rights to the throne. Most of the bloodlines descending from his bastards eventually died out, but nevertheless Louis XVI still has over one hundred living descendants through these bloodlines, outside the offspring of his marriage. He was engaged to his first cousin Mariana Victoria of Spain in childhood and the two, who had met only twice before, were married in August 1734 to maintain the family ties between France and Spain. At the time of the royal wedding he was 24 – his first bastard was two years old at the time already – while she was 16 and still a virgin, a status she lost with the consummation of their marriage in the wedding night. Their first child was born in May 1735 and was a healthy son, the future King Louis XVII. Fourteen more children followed, eleven of which reached adulthood.

His lack of true Catholic fervour also showed in his educational reforms: only in primary education were religious orders allowed control (and of course in seminaries, which were left alone). He aimed to increase the cohesion of his kingdom and therefore finalized what Louis XIV had started by encouraging the French language over the various regional languages: by decree of his great-grandson Louis XVI, French became the only official language in 1767. The school law of 1770 determined that secondary education became completely public and provided for a standardized curriculum. It taught the traditional classical languages (Latin and Greek). The curriculum also included modern languages (French and Spanish were mandatory, and at least one other language was required, with English, German, Portuguese, Italian, Swedish and Russian being offered). Beyond that, the curriculum placed the strongest emphasis on philosophy, mathematics, natural science (a combination of biology, physics, chemistry and astronomy, which hadn’t evolved into separate disciplines yet) and social science (a combination of economics, sociology, political science and history, which also hadn’t evolved into separate disciplines yet). Theology was a mandatory part of the curriculum, but its actual unimportance was underlined by the fact that it made up only two hours of the 28 hours of class a week; out of 28 hours, 26 were devoted to secular topics. Louis XVI founded two dozen Lycées Royales or “Royal Lyceums”, which in this transitional period coexisted with older forms of secondary education for a time. Eventually, the Royal Lyceums became so prestigious that they totally replaced other forms of secondary education, a situation that was made law early in the nineteenth century.

Universities were also reformed to build on this curriculum, which meant that institutions of tertiary education also became more secular. The lyceums and the universities educated the future elites of France. Besides science, King Louis XVI patronized the arts just like those before him and decided to combine all the artistic talent in the country into one institute. Increased exchange between disciplines was to encourage creativity and competition, producing greater works and laying the standard for culture education nationwide. The Academy of Painting and Sculpture (1648), the Academy of Music (1669) and the Academy of Architecture (1671), all founded during the reign of his illustrious ancestor Louis XIV, were merged into the Academy of Fine Arts in 1774.

In short, Louis XVI greatly encouraged the sciences as well as the arts, and these are considered his greatest legacies, along with his tax reforms and the emancipation of the serfs. His last major reform was to transform the Royal Bank (Banque Royale) into a true central bank similar to the Bank of England: its purpose became to lend money to the government and from then on the French government would never again fail to repay its creditors. He’s considered one of the greatest examples of an enlightened despot, a reputation enhanced by the fact that he didn’t involve France in any major wars during his twenty year reign. The King fell ill with tuberculosis in 1774 and died aged 64, upon which he was succeeded by his oldest son, King Louis XVII.

[1] This is OTL's Louis XV.
 
Last edited:
It's ironic that a King of France called Louis XVI is the one using the mob instead of being on the receiving end of it. :D
So what was the relationship between this timeline's Louis XV and Louis XVI?I presume the father doesn't like how lecherous his son is considering how devoted he himself was with his own wife?
 
Last edited:

Gian

Banned
How does the Huguenots fare? I'm guessing still thriving in New France, right?

Also, France IMO has all the potential to avoid the French Revolution entirely (though there might be some hankering for political reforms in the long run)
 
Eastern Europe, both north and south, seem like tinderboxes waiting to explode.
As always Willie, your TL's are kick-ass and captivating!

Small critique: the number of foreign languages offered in school seem way to numerous. Although I have little to no knowledge of the periode, knowledge of so many foreign languages sufficient for education for all of France's youth seem exaggerated. Specifically Swedish and Russian, although this makes ITTL way cooler than OTL!
 
wonderfully written timeline Onkel Willie !
yay smallpox seems to have been avoided
descriptive battles but not too enduring
(sorry others, I tend to go into a coma with dragged out 50 paragraph descriptions of single battles- my bad!)
as a huge fan of Saint-Simon, I was interested to see how the influence of the 'devotes' changed outcomes.
just one request: a geneologial table for the houses involved (though doesnt look 'too' unchanged at the moment, though not seeing Savoy on the map)
otherwise I'm suscribed like glue !
bravo !
 
Last edited:
Update :)


Chapter VIII: The War of the Hanoverian Succession, 1774-1787.

In 1774, the ambitious King Louis XVII of France ascended the throne at the age of 39. His Queen-Consort was the 35 year-old Maria Josepha of Bavaria (who had assumed the French name Marie Josephine), with whom he had already fathered five children since their wedding in 1758; the youngest of them was their only son, the future King. Louis XVII had been educated according to the standardized curriculum created by his father, though not at any of the lyceums but by private tutors. His favourite subject during his education was history and he avidly read about the reign of his great ancestor Louis XIV, who he viewed as an example of good rule and who he hoped to outdo.

Early in 1775, France signed military alliances with Nawab Siraj ud-Daulah of Bengal and with the Mughal Empire, sewing the seeds for the first major European conflict to arise from colonial disputes. The French encouraged the Nawab to kick out the British, starting with the successful conquest of British-controlled Calcutta, inciting a war between Britain and a proxy of France. Mysore and Hyderabad quickly took the opportunity and launched a surprise attack against the Maratha Empire while the British were distracted by Bengal, with whom the two states soon signed an official alliance. This produced a war between Britain and the Marathas on one hand and the Mughals, Mysore, Bengal and Hyderabad on the other. Needless to say, tensions between the two great powers started to rise again.

In the meantime, France sent a delegation to the court of Shah Alam II, the Mughal Emperor in Delhi, to whom they had already been indirectly allied due to the pre-existing Ottoman-Mughal alliance. The rejuvenated Ottoman Empire had managed to give Persia a run for its money with assistance from the decaying Mughal Empire and the co-belligerence of Russia in the 1720s. The distraction of the Persians enabled the Mughals to keep them from crossing the KhyberPass. The containment of their major foreign adversary gave them a new lease on life, at least as long as the British and the Maratha Empire didn’t turn on them. The French offered to help them modernize their army and their economy in the same way they had helped the Ottomans, in return for a Mughal declaration of war on the British East India Company. Shah Alam II agreed and declared war, not only on Britain but also on the Marathas, plunging much of the Indian subcontinent into war. First-rate troops of the French East India Company were fighting in the armies of Bengal, Mysore and the Mughals and that brought war between France and Britain very close. The French East India Company very quickly found itself in a de facto war with the British East India Company. The situation escalated because France soon began to support its East India Company with troops and weapons resorting directly under the crown. French troops now confronted Britons, albeit in the service of a company rather than Britain itself, but the Royal Navy directly supported the East India Company at this point. A few cannonballs from a Royal Navy ship of the line tearing through French ranks brought the two leading European powers into conflict and in August 1775 Louis XVII used it as an excuse to declare war on Great Britain.

What happened next surprised everyone, except for the French: Prussia declared war on Great Britain as well, in response to which Saxony entered the war on the side of Bavaria and Great Britain. After the last major war, Prussia’s ambitions to become the dominant power of northern Germany only increased after Bavaria’s enormous increase in territory and power after the War of the Habsburg Inheritance (in which all remaining Habsburg territories except Hungary were tied in personal union to Bavaria). Prussia was smaller, its population was lower and its lands were less productive, putting it in a disadvantageous position in terms of manpower and war making potential. It was therefore imperative to gain more land, more manpower, more industry, and to connect Prussia’s exclaves to the rest of the kingdom to make them more defensible (these exclaves were the Duchy of Bremen and Verden, the Principality of Minden and the County of Ravensberg; the County of Mark and the Duchy of Cleves had been lost to France).

To this end, Berlin tried to improve its relations with Paris. Many of the north German rulers were wary of Prussia’s ambitions and turned against Prussia, rallying around the Electorate of Hanover, which was tied in personal union to the crown of a great power sponsor, i.e. Great Britain. The British grew less friendly to Prussia in the two decades after the War of the Habsburg Inheritance due to the latter’s domineering attitude vis-à-vis northern Germany. A secondary catalyst that served as a convenient casus belli was that George III of the United Kingdom, Elector of Hanover, tried to change Hanover’s laws of succession because his heir apparent was a woman (Princess Charlotte; her older brothers had died in childhood). In Hanover a woman couldn’t inherit the throne unless there were no more viable male heirs. Charlotte ascending the throne of Great Britain would end the personal union between Britain and Hanover. Prussia refused to recognise the changes to Hanover’s succession laws and therefore this conflict is commonly known as the War of the Hanoverian Succession in Europe.

France responded positively to the overtures from the iron kingdom because their relations with their main ally Bavaria had changed too. The Wittelsbachs had become the ruling dynasty of the Holy Roman Empire in 1706 and with French help tied the Habsburg lands (minus rump-Hungary) to them in personal union. For a while Franco-Bavarian relations were cemented by the marriage of Holy Roman Emperor Maximilian IV (King of Bavaria as Maximilian III Joseph) to Louis XVII’s oldest sibling Henriette, who was fourteen months younger than him (born in 1736). At the time of his ascension in 1748, Maximilian IV was 21 years old and unwed, a situation that was remedied through a political marriage to the granddaughter of Louis XV (and daughter of the future Louis XVI) who arranged the marriage. In 1753, the now 26 year-old Holy Roman Emperor married the 17 year-old Henriette who gave birth to his heir, the future Emperor Maximilian V, the following year.

In 1764, the marriage ended because she died in childbirth, which came at a bad time. Bavarian interests started to diverge from French interests more and more and now there was no French presence at the court to maintain positive relations. Bavaria wanted to exclusively dominate southern Germany, which conflicted with French ambitions to add the Rhineland to their lands. They coveted the Duchy of Jülich, the Duchy of Berg and the Electoral Palatinate, which were ruled by Charles Theodore. He was a member of the house of Palatinate-Sulzbach, which was a branch of the Bavarian house of Wittelsbach, and he turned to his relative Maximilian IV for protection against French ambitions. Bavaria wanted to preserve the union of all lines of the Wittelsbach dynasty and wouldn’t stand for France throwing one of their relatives out of his lands. At this point Bavaria had become a great power in its own right (filling up the vacuum initially created by the demise of the Habsburgs). Therefore France initially backed off, but relations cooled nonetheless. This alienation between the two increased further when France tried to interfere with the appointment of the Archbishops of Cologne and Trier, who were also prince-electors (and whose territories lay in the Rhineland). They were members of the Electoral College that elected the Holy Roman Emperor, which in practice meant ratifying the dynastic Wittelsbach succession. If France could establish undue influence over Trier and Cologne, then they could influence the election and the Wittelsbachs perceived this as a threat. The French move made Bavarian distrust so great that relations were irreparably damaged, precipitating the Franco-Prussian rapprochement in the 1770s.

Prussian forces commanded personally by Frederick II advanced into Hanoverian territory and took the capital of Hanover with relative ease. In the meantime, a French army effortlessly took the small Imperial State of Zweibrücken, ruled by another branch of the Wittelsbachs and then confronted an army of Bavarian and Palatine troops at Speyerbach. Louis XVII feigned a withdrawal with his left and centre and then let the trap swing shut, successfully imitating Hannibal’s strategy in the Battle of Cannae. Given that Bavaria with its Austrian and Bohemian lands could raise large armies of its own, France couldn’t rely on numerical advantage as much as it used to and needed such well laid battle plans. After the Battle of Speyerbach in August 1775 battles raged across central and southern Germany.

In the meantime, the British engaged the French at sea, leading to the inconclusive engagement in the Battle of Quiberon Bay. The Royal Navy had hoped to destroy the French navy’s ability to reinforce its overseas empire in North America and India, but didn’t inflict enough losses to achieve that. In North America, small battles and skirmishes were fought all along the frontier region between British North America and New France. The French were outnumbered, but were loyal to their King. Initially France had ruled through a Viceroy and a limited bureaucratic apparatus, but that was no longer sufficient for the prospering colony. Louis XVI had therefore introduced the elected provincial assemblies in New France to assist the Viceroy, tightening the central government’s grip while paradoxically also giving the local elites a greater say in how they were governed. Of course the crown required more taxes from time to time, in return for which these colonial provincial assemblies gained a few more powers and responsibilities.

In the meantime, British Americans were resenting the fact that they weren’t being treated equally to their countrymen in the mother country. They paid taxes (which were increased again to fund this war) and fought in the King’s wars, but were government from afar by a Parliament that gave them no representation. They simply said that Parliament represented all of its subjects, including the non-voting ones, a concept called “virtual representation.” A riot started in Boston when the Royal Navy tried to recruit some sailors, which in those days amounted to little more than snatching people of lower class from the streets. The new “sailors” (often drunkards, vagrants and anybody else out on the street not wearing upper class clothing) actively resisted being pressed into service, even though it would provide them with a living to many of them that had none. The riot spread across Boston, not coincidentally the home of a large Irish community and by the winter of 1775-’76 there was restiveness across British North America. For a large part this was France’s doing because they supported this colonial rebellion with weapons. It died down when France made a few serious inroads, prompting the realization that British rule was still preferable over French rule. Additionally, Britain promised “responsible government” whilst discouraging any further thoughts of rebellion by hanging its leaders, including its chief commander, the traitor George Washington. By 1778, the American Rebellion was over.

The other major colonial theatre was India, where the war had started. The Marathas fought like lions, but under assault from three sides they started to crumble and were decisively defeated in the battles of Indore and Jodhpur. In the Battle of Indore in November 1777, troops from France, Mysore and Hyderabad confronted a joint British-Maratha army and the outnumbered Marathas suffered devastating losses against a more numerous enemy. The Marathas were unable able to allocate more troops to deal with the threat to their south because simultaneously a Mughal army advanced into Rajput. This led to a major confrontation at Jodhpur, which itself proved inconclusive but allowed for the victory of France and its allies, making it incredibly strategically important. Battles raged across northern India for several more years, and plague and famine then struck the Marathas too.

The war in India dragged on until 1782 when the Maratha Empire finally imploded and was partitioned between the victors. Mysore annexed the Konkan coast, the Nizam of Hyderabad annexed Berar province, the Mughals annexed Rajput, and Bengal annexed the province of Orissa, which they had lost to the Marathas in 1751. The lion’s share fell to France. Gujarat was directly annexed by the French East India Company, putting a swath of land under their direct rule covering an area equal to one third of France. Like on the east coast with the Northern Circars, France now had a significant coastline in western India. The remainder of the Maratha Empire was reduced to a vassal as the French East India Company as well as the crown obtained the right to collect revenues, agreeing to a fifty-fifty split between them. Besides that French officers were added to the Maratha Empire. This was arranged in the Treaty of Pondicherry in 1780, which didn’t involve the British, who continued the war. Bombay was subsequently occupied by French forces until the end of the war. In 1781, Afghanistan and Persia got involved, but it was too little, too late for the Marathas and Britain’s position in India. The British East India Company decisively lost its dominant position, being reduced to a few coastal trading posts (most prominently Bombay, which was returned to Britain after the war). France became the dominant power in the Indian subcontinent.

In Europe, in the meantime, Tsar Peter III hatched a plan to exploit the situation. He had conducted many liberal reforms like establishing provincial boyar dumas, abolishing the secret police, abolishing the use of torture, fighting corruption, establishing public litigation, declaring religious freedom and granting more rights to the serfs. He issued hundreds of laws and decrees during his reign. Above all, he had reformed the Russian army by introducing the Prussian drill, drawing over a quarter of his generals from Prussia to reform his military (emulating his grandfather Peter the Great, who employed many foreign officers to modernize his army). Peter III is regarded as a strong reformer that modernized his country, somewhat like his grandfather Peter the Great though not transforming the country as unrecognizably. In part this image of a strong leader was derived from his success in squashing a coup d’état orchestrated by his wife Catherine a few months into his reign in 1762. His Enlightened reform plans – his granting of religious freedom and more rights to the serfs in particular – didn’t go down well with certain segments of the clergy and the boyars. The coup failed and the Tsar sentenced his wife Catherine to house arrest at Ropsha, 49 km south-west of Peterhof, for the rest of her natural life (she committed suicide in 1766). The two never saw each other again after 1762, she never again saw her son and she didn’t really see anyone apart from a few servants assigned to her; the combination of loneliness and being separated from her child most likely contributed to her decision to take her own life. Peter III was a lot less merciful to her boyar co-conspirators, one of whom was Catherine’s lover, who were executed by hanging or exiled.

In 1780, Tsar Peter III decided to test his new army by attacking Sweden to undo its gains at Russia’s expense by the Treaty of Abo signed over thirty years before. A Russian army attacked the newly built Swedish fortress at Vyborg, kicking off the war. The modern defences didn’t do the Swedes much good because the navy couldn’t reinforce the garrison. The Swedes had been forced to limit naval expenditure due to budgetary constraints resulting from trying to match the frightening growth of Russia’s land army (besides that, Sweden had racked up a serious debt in the last war). Sweden’s efficient bureaucratic machinery had been creative with the limitations of a small population and little natural resources for a long time, but the maximum extent of what could be done with limited means had been reached. The Russian navy defeated the smaller Swedish navy off Gotland, making Russia the undisputed dominant naval power in the Baltic Sea. Russian troops advanced along the Finnish coast and cut Finland off from the rest of Sweden in line with Peter III’s ambition to annex it wholesale. In 1783, the war ended with a decisive Russian victory and its annexation of Finland as well as the Aland Islands. The time of the Swedish Empire had definitively come to an end.

The alliance between France and Prussia in combination with Russia’s war against Sweden indirectly put Russia on the same team as France (Prussia and Russia were still allies). Sweden had damaged its relations with France by bailing out of the previous war and these relations were never mended because the latter found a more powerful ally in Prussia. The Franco-Swedish alliance came to a definitive end when Sweden sought British support against Russia.

Russia became a full cobelligerent on the side of France and Prussia in 1782 when Persia’s Shah Shahrukh Afshar, grandson of Nader Shah, allied with Britain and attacked the Mughals together with the Afghans. Shahrukh Afshar hoped to shore up the position of his dynasty – which had weakened due to civil wars after the death of his grandfather Nader Shah – with a quick victorious war. It backfired because the war turned into a slogging match in the Himalayas: with French support, the Mughals managed to keep the Afghans and Persians at arms length. On a rare occasion, just like sixty years before, Russia and the Ottoman Empire fought side by side against Persia. The weak Persian Empire had fractured under the pressure by 1785. Persian Azerbaijan was annexed by Russia, bolstering its holdings on the southern Caspian coast, while the Ottomans annexed the Khuzestan region to strengthen its position on the Persian Gulf. Persia descended into a civil war that led to the establishment of the Qajar dynasty.

Russia, in the meantime, exploited Persia’s weakness by attacking a Persian dependency, the Khanate of Khiva. Peter the Great had sent an armed trade expedition in 1717 after the discovery of gold on the banks of the OxusRiver, together with the desire to open a trade route to India. They had initially been received hospitably by the Khivan khan Shir Ghazi, who then suddenly ambushed and slaughtered the envoys, leaving ten alive to send back. At the time Peter the Great had done nothing because he was heavily indebted after his wars against Sweden and the Ottomans. Seventy years later, in 1787, his grandson Peter III sent an army of 15.000 men with conquest in mind rather than an equitable trade relationship. In less than a year, Khiva was burnt to the ground and Khan Yadigar II was killed while on the run, his lands being annexed by the Russian Empire. After that, the Kazakh Khanate (which had split into three “hordes” in 1718) and the Emirate of Bukhara were forced to become protectorates of Russia.

In the meantime, battles continued to rage across Germany and Britain, for the first time in a long time, deployed a large army to the continent to bolster its Bavarian allies and to try and drive the Prussians out of Hanover. At sea, the Royal Navy kept trying to lure the French navy into a decisive engagement, after which Britain wanted to cut off France’s colonies from their motherland. The French navy was somewhat smaller in numbers and kept avoiding that decisive battle, instead trying to lure portions of the Royal Navy into traps and destroy it piecemeal.

Stubborn refusal from both sides to settle the conflict diplomatically caused the war to drag out for a decade. In 1784, France was struck by a failed harvest and an outbreak of plague that precipitated a severe economic crisis. That forced Louis XVII to seek an end to the war despite his advantageous strategic position, a position that at least allowed him to negotiate from a position of strength.

The Treaty of Emden concluded the war. France annexed the Electorates of Trier and Cologne (as well as the Free Imperial City of Cologne). The prince-electors of both were robbed of their temporal power and henceforth were just archbishops within the Kingdom of France with only spiritual authority vested in them. Another electorate that met its end was the Electoral Palatinate, which was also annexed by France along with the Duchies of Jülich and Berg. These three territories had been ruled in personal union by Charles Theodore, a member of the House of Palatinate-Sulzbach, who went into exile in Bavaria where his Wittelsbach relatives could protect him. Palatine Zweibrücken, ruled by yet another branch of the Wittelsbachs, was annexed by France too. The end result was that France dominated the Rhineland (in combination with its pre-existing holdings in Germany, i.e. the Duchy of Cleves and the County of Mark). While they were at it, they annexed the Prince-Bishopric of Liège, their puppet state; the title of Prince-Bishop remained, but it was purely symbolic.

Prussia, in the meantime, erased the Electorate of Saxony as a state, turning it into just another province of the growing iron kingdom. As far as Hanover went, it preserved its independence, but had to reverse the changes made to its succession laws by George III (a monarch that didn’t even speak German and had never actually visited Hanover). This meant that, once George III died, Princess Charlotte would inherit the throne of Great Britain and Ireland while the Electorate of Hanover would pass to her younger brother Prince Edward, Duke of Kent and Strathearn. Prussia gained the right to station troops in Hanover and march its troops across Hanoverian territory to its exclaves of Minden, Ravensberg and Bremen-Verden. Additionally, Prussia arranged that future elector Edward was engaged to Prussian princess Frederica Charlotte, the daughter of the future King Frederick William II of Prussia (nephew and successor of Frederick II). This marriage was to cement Hanover’s status as a Prussian puppet, solidifying Prussia’s status as the ruler of northern Germany. Prussian ambitions were satisfied for now.

In exchange for all of this, in the meantime, Bavaria saw the imperial title being made hereditary. All the changes had made the Electoral College of the Holy Roman Empire almost unworkable and Bavaria demanded a hereditary title to remedy this situation. They got what they wanted. A refusal on France’s part would have meant a continuation of the war, which their Prussian allies weren’t up for at this time because in 1786 Frederick II, after his death known as Frederick the Great, died. This led to the dissolution of the Electoral College and, since the title of prince-elector was now meaningless, the electors became kings. In 1787, the Treaty of Emden officially concluded the war.
 
Regarding Hanover,it's succession law was always agnatic-primogeniture,so you don't need to change the law at all.

If my understanding is correct, then you would have to change them in order to allow a woman to ascend the Hanoverian throne before a male heir, which is what TTL's George III is going for. OTL's succession laws caused the personal union to end when Victoria became Queen of Great Britain. Hanover subsequently went to her uncle Ernest Augustus I. The same would happen here if I'm not mistaken.
 
If my understanding is correct, then you would have to change them in order to allow a woman to ascend the Hanoverian throne before a male heir, which is what TTL's George III is going for. OTL's succession laws caused the personal union to end when Victoria became Queen of Great Britain. Hanover subsequently went to her uncle Ernest Augustus I. The same would happen here if I'm not mistaken.
Basically,you don't need to change the law if you want the personal union to end.By the way,you mean the throne would pass to Charlotte's cousin or uncle in this timeline right?I highly doubt there will be any chance of a law passing to give a woman a throne,especially not to exclude a monarch's son from the throne just to give his sister a throne.
 
I have to ask because this point is bothering me a bit....why did you end the American Rebellion in 1778? Why was Washington executed? If the French had higher populations in New France/ Quebec, wouldn't it stand to reason that they would want to either use the enlarged population as mercenaries for hire for the American rebels, or even tap into that reserve of manpower to actually cross the frontiers and render aid directly to the rebels? Wouldn't an American rebellion against Britain work to France's advantage as it did in OTL, in that they got their revenge for their loss in the French and Indian War?

Lastly, does the ending of the rebellion with the execution of Washington in 1778 mean that the 13 Colonies never become the United States, or does it merely postpone the Revolution for another 5-10 years (with perhaps Andrew Jackson and Thomas Jefferson assuming the roles of Washington and Adams, respectively)?
 
Top