1331-2: Scotland
1331-2: 'AND WHEN EDWARD NEXT LOOKED ROUND, ON HIS HEAD THERE WAS A CROWN'

"In popular romances, the great fight of Robert the Bruce was a simple battle against English invaders, a bold struggle to free Scotland from its alien masters. Like most nationalistic myth, it is a convenient simplification. Edward Longshanks held sway in most of Scotland for over two decades--that rule was not based only on foreign soldiers but included numerous suborned Scottish lords. Indeed, it was easy to forget now that it had been the Bruces that had called Edward into the dispute over the crown to begin with, and indeed had been among his earliest supporters against John Balliol. As so often happens in civil wars, local feuds and personal grudges became incorporated into the greater struggle. Some men found themselves fighting for the English because their own opponents were fighting against them--others had allied with the English to further their goals and then found themselves unable to extricate themselves as skillfully as the Bruces had. Such people lost frequently lost everything--and not unfrequently watched newly-minted Bruce supporters take their lands. They called themselves the 'Disinherited', and they would tear down all that Robert Bruce had wrought...

"Any cause needs a leader, and in Henry Beaumont, the de jure earl of Buchan, and former Constable of Scotland, it had one, save for one slight flaw. An able soldier, a skilled general, and a capable politician, he was also a French-born adventurer who had achieved his titles through advantageous marriage, and friendship with Edward I of England. This meant any effort he personally lead would be easily tarred as nothing more than the acts of a feckless foreign adventurer. If Beaumont wished to regain what he'd lost, he needed a figurehead--and a perfect one existed, living in a heavily mortgaged estate in France.

"Edward Balliol was the son of John Balliol, the famed (or infamous) Toom Tabard, who had lost the throne and his estates to the games of Bruces and the English. While his early life is obscure, it is believed Edward had been a soldier, and even earned some reputation for courage--what is certain is that the man had nothing to lose. Arriving in England in late 1331, he settled in Yorkshire and with Beaumont's assistance, gathered the Disinherited to him. By mid-1332, they stood at the head of a small, but dedicated force, waiting only for a sign to attack. And then it came, in the news that the Regent the Earl of Moray was dead. Edward had the force set sail almost as soon as they heard...

"Arriving in Fife, the Disinherited went on the march, startled by speed at which the new Regent, the Earl of Mar gathered a force to oppose them. What followed was a game of cat and mouse, where the outnumbered Disinherited avoided battle with their Scottish foes until they reached a place of their choosing, Dupplin Moor. There, the Disinherited responded to the Regent's attack with what future generations would term 'English tactics'[1]. The result was a lopsided victory for the Disinherited that destroyed much of Mar's army--estimates range from 2000 to 13000--including, the hapless Regent would write, 'many men of quality and renown' among them Lord Robert Bruce, King John's bastard half-brother, Thomas Randolph, 2nd Earl of Moray, and Alexander Fraser, High Chamberlain[2]. The Disinherited, in contrast had lost thirty-three knights and men at arms, and possibly a slightly larger number of infantry....

"In the face of this victory, Edward Balliol decided to continue his attack, and marched on Scone. A few weeks later, he would be crowned king. Thus began a war that would come to involve all of Europe[3]..."

--From Crowned Upon the Stone; the Story of Scotland, by Gyth Gythson (1998)
----------------------------------------------------------------

[1] This is all more or less what happened OTL.

[2] IOTL, Mar himself was among those dead men of quality and renown.

[3] Again, this is what happened IOTL.
 
1332-3: England and Scotland
1332-3: 'A SPIDER AT HIS WEB'

"...Prince Edward's role in the beginning of the Scottish Civil War remains enigmatic, which is most likely how the frequently duplicitous monarch wanted it. Rumors suggest the Prince of Wales met with Beaumont and Balliol before the pair launched their invasion, but it is impossible to confirm. What is certain is that the Prince, heading a Parliament meant to consider disturbances in Ireland, found himself instead preoccupied by the news from Scotland, where Edward Balliol seemed to sweep all opposition away. Despite his success, the general consensus was that Balliol would soon see his fortune turn. Instead, the good news continued to arrive. Galloway rose to its exiled king's call. Balliol was crowned at Scone. It seemed that what had been intended as a mere bit of pressure at a hated rival was upending the Scottish throne completely. The Prince's response was to call another Parliament at York[1]...

"It was a scarcely-attended gathering--few lords had the time to meet again at such short notice at such a remote location. Even as the Chief Justice of the King's Bench, Sir Geoffrey le Scrope, noted that the Prince had remarkable latitude for dealing with the Scots, as Balliol's father had given up the crown to Edward Longshanks[2], the Prince of Wales saw his options narrowing. John de Bruce's hapless regent, the Earl of Mar had sent formal terms of submission to Balliol, who had set up a court in the fortress of Roxburgh--raised in England, Mar was a weak reed for the Bruce cause to rest on in the best of circumstances[3]As it now rested, he saw the only hopes of the Bruces of preserving some of their fortunes being a formal surrender in hopes of getting generous terms. In the north, David Strathbogie, Earl of Atoll had easily taken back his lands, and indeed, was already in talks with John's nephew and heir, Robert Stewart, to gain the latter's surrender[4]. It seemed all around the cause of Bruces was in retreat, and that if the Prince of Wales did not reach an arrangement with Balliol now, he would deal with him later, a King with a kingdom as securely united behind him as Robert Bruce had had when he dealt with the Prince's father. Already, Balliol's terms seem to grow less grand, less extraordinary, as his need for English support declined...

"In the end Prince Edward grabbed the opportunity while he could--his sister Eleanor, under consideration for a continental match, found herself sent to Perth, to be wedded to the "King of Scots" a man old enough to be her father[5]... King Edward, who when he was not enjoying his de facto retirement engaged in what amounted to amateur gardening[6], enjoyed it by siring yet more children on his second wife in what come to be sizable brood, gave his grudging consent, though is said to have cautioned his eldest that Scotland was a tricky matter that 'Once begun, will prove hard to end, drawing you ever further, and further, promising all and delivering naught'. The King spoke from experience, but his son did not listen, even as Balliol found it to be true even for a prospective King of Scots..."

--From This Terrible Majesty (Vol. 1): Prince and Steward by Augusta Lyme (1978)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[1] This is fairly close to Edward's OTL actions.

[2] Scrope made similar statements OTL. Yes, Edward was already preparing a backstab on top of a backstab.

[3] Needless to say, this was a worry IOTL, which Mar had solved by dying in battle.

[4] Strathbogie and Stewart, two of the great tackers in Scottish history, were coming to similar arrangements at this point.

[5] IOTL, she would wed Reginald the Black, Duke of Guelders, who, though younger than Balliol, was still old enough to be her father. As we will see when we look at him later, it was not a happy match. He earned that nickname.

[6] This was an actual hobby of Edward II. In many ways, Edward II was born in the wrong century--he really would have been much happier as a ceremonial monarch.
 
Good stuff. I found this timeline recently and, given I am an avid CK2 player, very much enjoy this era. It's interesting to see that while many things remain the same there are small but accumulating changes.
 
Thanks. Two more installments on the opening stages of the Second Scottish War, and then we move to the Papacy. See John XXII get accused of being a heretic. Again!
 
1333-4: Scotland
1333-4: "A LAND THAT HATH MADE AND UNMADE KINGS IN GREAT NUMBERS..."

"...Even as he married Eleanor of England, the high point of Edward Balliol's fortunes had already turned. In December, even as Mar sent messages to all his fellows to submit to Balliol 'who was surely King of Scots' a secret meeting was held by loyalist lords who declared that as Mar no longer recognized John Bruce as his sovereign, he could not be considered Guardian of Scotland. Mar seems to have been vaguely aware of such going-ons, and reportedly warned Balliol about such designs. Perhaps that is why Balliol responded to an offer to reach a formal accord with the Parliament by sending a small force of supporters to meet with them[1]. At Annan, they were slaughtered for the most part where they slept by forces under the leadership of Sir Archibald Douglas. Among the dead was Edward Balliol's kinsman, Henry[2].

"In raw numbers, Annan was a small matter. But for a king whose entire claim was irresistible strength of arms, it was enough--the opposition, hitherto demoralized, began to rally. And here was where the other, fatal weakness of Balliol's coalition made itself apparent--the Disinherited had been united when they came, but having won, had fallen apart, each seeking to claim their own lands. While some stayed true, more than a few followed the example of David Strathbogie, Earl of Atholl, who, as he Edward's star start to wane, opportunistically changed sides[3]. By early spring in 1334, Bruce loyalist forces were on the march, and Balliol allies were thin on the ground. The hapless Earl of Mar gathered an army to face his former allies (among them former Disinherited David Strathbogie), and was soundly beaten at Dumfries, with over half his army deserting to join the opposing side. Forced to desert his stronghold at Roxburgh--though he succeeded in capturing the Bruces' new Guardian of Scotland, Sir Andrew Murray, during the battle[4]--Balliol returned to England, pregnant wife in tow, to beg the support of his "dear brother" the Prince of Wales. The Prince eagerly gave it.

"The 'two Edwards' marched back over the border in June, besieging Berwick. Sir Archibald Douglas, elected Guardian to replace the imprisoned Murray, lead loyalist forces to meet them...[5]"

--From Crowned Upon the Stone; the Story of Scotland, by Gyth Gythson (1998)
----------------------------------------------------------------
[1] IOTL, Balliol went to Annan himself, speeding the collapse of his cause.
[2] Henry Balliol is listed as a casualty of Annan in numerous accounts. His exact relation to Edward is vague--some list him as a younger brother, but this is questionable.
[3] David switched sides around this point IOTL. He was not a man overburdened with loyalty.
[4] Murray was elected Guardian IOTL, and captured in such a manner.
[5] Douglas was Murray's replacement as Guardian IOTL.
 
1334: Scotland
1334: BERWICK AND HALIDON HILL

"...Between them, the Prince and Edward Balliol reduced much of the city of Berwick to rubble, leaving a depleted garrison guarding the citadel. The Warden of Berwick agreed to surrender if the city was not relieved in two weeks--when this time passed, and the city did not surrender, Prince Edward began to hang his hostages, starting with the son of the garrison commander, and continued at two a day, in hopes to break the garrison's will and punish them for breaking their faith[1]. The army of Sir Archibald, facing the imminent surrender of Berwick, found itself forced to commit to a battle against an English army, on that army's terms. The Prince set his army upon Halidon Hill, hoping to use his archers to their greatest advantage.

"His hopes would be met beyond his wildest imaginings. Forced off their horses by muddy ground, the Scots first advanced hopelessly on foot, uphill, through a hail of arrows, then broke themselves on the disciplined English lines... Fleeing the battle, the retreating Scots found that the camp followers had fled with their horses. Some fled on foot, and were run down, over distances as far as five miles--others flung themselves into the sea in desperation. The whole count of the dead is unknowable. Among the slain in the battle itself were Sir Archibald Douglas, and five Scottish Earls[2]. Robert Stewart, Great Steward of the Realm and nephew and heir to young King John, saw his uncle and tutor Sir James Stewart killed before his very eyes, then took the stomach wound that would kill him over a week later, 'ranting and raving for Christ's deliverance from his sufferings' by one account[3]. The burgeoning Scottish resistance had been gutted, and many felt certain that the Scottish wars were at last over...

"When news of the victory reached King Edward in London in the midst of ordering celebrations for his newly-born son Thomas, he had the celebrations doubled 'that all may know my great joy'. For the Prince, Halidon Hill was a defining moment, even more than his suppression of the rebels during the Earl of Kent's Rising and subsequent seizing of power. For the rest of his life, Edward would bear a supreme faith in English arms gained in this battle, one that would banish the disappointments of Saint-Sardos..."

--From This Terrible Majesty (Vol. 1): Prince and Steward by Augusta Lyme (1978)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[1] These were Edward's actions during his OTL siege of Berwick as well. No one ever accused Edward III of having a soft heart.
[2] The OTL battle of Halidon Hill went just as badly for the Scots.
[3] Obviously, IOTL, Robert Stewart lived, and went on to become King Robert II. He did however see his uncle James killed before his eyes during Halidon.
 
Right you are, did they have children though? Nothing I've read suggests they did.

Sir John Stewart of Ralston appears to have had children IOTL, though the male line died out in the next generation. And of course, being Great Steward of the Realm helps your chances with the ladies.
 
Sir John Stewart of Ralston appears to have had children IOTL, though the male line died out in the next generation. And of course, being Great Steward of the Realm helps your chances with the ladies.

This is very true, I suppose he'd get a much more advantageous marriage when the time comes.
 
Looking forward to the pace slowing down a bit so I can get a better handle on the personality of the cast of characters.
 
1333-6: France
1333-6: AULD INTRIGUE

"In later years, when it became necessary to find a villain to fix the blame on France's lackluster initial response to the invasion of Scotland, one came ready made. Philip de Valois, Duke of Anjou himself bemoaned his early handling of the matter, declaring over a decade later that it was success in Scotland that 'hath made the English so overbearing that they will hear only words of submission'. Obviously, this admitted error was taken up by King John, always eager to blacken Anjou's name and insist that unpopular policies had nothing to do with him. When Balliol launched his invasion, the King was only just returning from Navarre, placing the response in the hand of Anjou--who did nothing. As the situation developed Anjou insisted on viewing it as an internal Scottish matter, trusting in Prince Edward's assurances that he was uninvolved. These were blatant lies--and yet Anjou chose to believe them, or at the very least, not to look at them very hard. After John returned, Anjou continued to advise that France avoid involvement in 'this quarrel of Scots', even as the English poured over the border[1].

"Of course this clear case of negligence is not so clear in the end, thanks to one simple fact--John's initial response was to agree with his brother-in-law. The cause of their mutual willingness to abandon the Scots to their fate was simple--the hoped-for Crusade in the Holy Land. Despite France's renewed treaty with Scotland, England remained a more valuable ally for such an undertaking--indeed a necessary one. Anjou had by this point spent years in negotiation with the English to bring this to fruition, a difficult process that had involved endless delegations, and dangling out the restoration of English rights in Gascony--he was loathe to toss out what progress he had made, as were King John and most of his advisors. Indeed, King John had even set a formal date for the crusade to set out, August of 1336, and sent ambassadors to try and recruit his uncle, Charles of Hungary, while Anjou had worked to assemble a massive fleet at Marseilles[2]. Even those few friends Scotland had on the council of France counted the matter lost after Halidon Hill--which had even been witnessed by a small group of French ambassadors[3]. It truly appeared that the Scots were to be abandoned.

"That would be startlingly reversed with the arrival in Paris of John Bruce, King of the Scots in 1335. Transported there by the Earl of Moray, one of the few survivors of the debacle of Halidon, the boy king was promptly given shelter by John of France, who publicly swore to defend Bruce's rights as King of Scots. John's reasons seem to have stemmed more from his own egotism than any strategic concerns--still even Anjou saw the point in avoiding giving French allies the impression that the crown could not be counted on to support them. Indeed, for a brief while, Anjou seems to have believed that it was possible for the French to restore Bruce to his throne and go on the crusade, simply by giving the English concessions in Gascony, but John swiftly disabused him of that notion. He was, he declared, tired of dealing with Prince Edward on this matter--his cousin was 'so swollen with conceit' that making any arrangement with him was impossible. Besides England's losses in Gascony were wholly deserved and necessary for France's well-being--John would not restore what he would likely have to take again. In all likelihood, the King spared Anjou a great deal of pointless negotiation[4]--still, to see his approach rebuked by his sovereign was a sign that the Duke's influence was waning--more than a few suspected that John was simply parroting Robert of Artois. They may have been right.

"As a France that had to worry about conflict with the English was a France that could not conduct a crusade, the project that had dominated French foreign policy was first shelved, then abandoned when it was clear the new Pope was far less in favor of it than his predecessors[5]. And so it was that fleet assembled in Marseilles found itself re-purposed for another war..."

--John I of France, Vol. 1; A King in His Cradle, Antony Oates (1978)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[1] IOTL, Philip of Valois likewise did his best to stay out of the Second Scottish War of Independence for the first few years.

[2] Yes, there really was a French recruited fleet in Marseilles for an upcoming crusade at the beginning of OTL's Hundred Years War as well.

[3] As you are doubtless suspecting I am going to say--yep, there were actual French ambassadors at the OTL siege of Berwick.

[4] John most certainly has--IOTL, neither France nor England would budge on Gascony matters. And now, if I may digress, we get to what actually started the Hundred Years War--not the oft-repeated succession dispute, but the ongoing war with Scotland that folded neatly into the disputes about Gascony, and a great deal of Anglo-Frankish problems to create a perfect storm. Edward III's claim to the throne was ultimately a means to an end, nothing more.

[5] More on this figure in the next installment.
 
Top