Bloch MB.150-155 series has fewer teething problems

I've been reading a new book on WWII fighters I got for Christmas and have been reading about the French Bloch MB 150 series of fighters. The later models did fairly well in combat in 1940 but major teething problems meant that by the time the German invasion started most either still lacked guns and props or had only recently arrived in squadron service. Even in squadrons with little experiance with the plane it did well and survived better then the MS 406.
What would have happened had some of the teething problems been butterflyed away and the Bloch fighters were combat capable and in widespread squadron service months before the German invasion? What are the effects of the Battle of France?
 
Really? I know its not overmatch for a BF109 like the D.520 or the Spitfire but it gives the French a Hurricane type plane. They'll get chewed up by 109s but they'll do a lot more damage to bombers then the transitional MS.406s did. Stukas going down in fireballs can't hit French tanks which will make the French/British technical advantage in armor more apparent.
 
Unfortunately, it probably doesn't really matter how many D.520s or MB.150s the French have, their operational plan only deployed 1/4 of their fighter strength to forward areas, and most Allied pilots (French or British) only made at most 2 sorties a day, whereas German Bf.109 pilots were often flying 4 sorties a day. Quite a few authors I've read over the years have argued that the Luftwaffe's success in May/June 40 wasn't so much do to the strengths of their tactics or aircraft but the force-multiplier effect of their operational doctrine, and I'm inclined to agree.
 
I can't think of one outstanding attribute possessed by the Bloch 152. General French lethargy in the development of aircraft and aero-engines meant that Gnome-Rhone and Hispano-Suiza engines were generally underpowered and two French aircraft, the Dewoitine D.520 and Arsenal VG.33 were numerically non-starters. Beaurocratic dithering.

The tactical situation was such that the army and air force fought their separate battles. The lessons of combined operations was to come later for the allies in the desert of North Africa. The Allies commonly reacted to situations three days late due to complete lack of CCC. Some French generals didn't believe in radio or telephone and refused to react until a runner brought a written message. Orders went out the same way.
 
If the MB. 155 has been mass-produced smoothly, the French might have a fighting chance against Germany stating that the Panzer Corps on the ground desperately need air support. But what they can only do is to delay German progress, the outcome would still depend on the situation on the ground, if the Allies won't change their tactics, strategies, and doctrines immediately, France would still lose, only on a much slower and bloodier pace.
 
Perhaps but the more time it buys, the greater the chance to change tactics or rethink strategy. The French had aopted what they called the Hedgeog defences (defence in depth and mutually supporting positions if I remember correctly).

With fewer casualties earlier on these tactics might attract notice from the British.
How will this affect other countries' attitudes to radial engines in fighters? Will we see an earlier FW 190 or Sea Fury?
Will the Italians pilfer the factories or designs and have decent fighters later in the war?

The question real is, how can this fighter series have its development accelarated/smoothed out?
 
Last edited:
Top