alternatehistory.com

What if Tsar Nicholas II gets really stubborn and rejects all the advice of his ministers about the incompatibility of the Treaty of Bjorko with Russia's other alliance commitments?

It's 1904 or 1905, Russia now has an alliance with Germany, and it does abrogate its alliance with France either. In fact, the Russians are inviting France into a 3 way alliance.

I'd presume that Tsarist firmness in committing to the deal with Germany would be echoed by the Kaiser overruling any objections to the treaty also.

So, with a Russo-German alliance in central Europe, the two power can dictate terms to the small states of the Balkans and compel the Austro-Hungarians to come along for the ride.

Meanwhile, France is pissed off, because a Russia friendly to Germany, even if Russia is still friendly to France, negates the benefit of having Russia as an ally *against* Germany for a revanche rematch.

But what options does France have. Would disappointment lead France to abrogate the alliance with Russia? Would French diplomats and strategists think it wise to get carried away like that?
Would France cut off its credits and investments in Russia? That could hurt Russia, and there's no guarantee that substituting German capital will happen. But, were the prior 10+ years of French investment in Russia such that the French would be cutting their own throats in sabotaging the Russian economy? Could France find itself "going along to get along" and so staying aligned with Russia and not rocking the boat against Germany?

What happens in Europe in general, and for the French in particular, if we go with this PoD?
Top