Come on, he wrote three good books in that series.Jesus you just made me have PTSD flashbacks
Isn't he the guy who wrote the New Atheist revenge fantasy The Salvation War?The US in Stuart Slade's The Big One series.
- Take what's already a postwar superpower.
- Make all its possible rivals either friendly, weak, or both.
- At the same time, make them belligerent enough that they act up and give the Americans a chance to show off their weapons and easily crush them .
- Have everyone from non-American characters to the narrator constantly talk about how amazing the Americans are.
- With a variety of both narrative setups and in-universe contrivances like overly capable special forces, eliminate what should be the weakness of their (on-paper) over-specialized all or nothing nuclear bomber military.
We need a BhutanwankWe need some new wanks... never really understood the appeal of wanking a great power/major power which effectively already HAD their wank OTL
Well, we have a couple of Nepalis on here who sort of have a lock on their near-neighbor, so I don't see a Bhutanwank as being out of the questionWe need a Bhutanwank
Poland in the Conrad Stargard series gets an industrial revolution in Medieval times, and superintelligent horses, and magic cheese that cures illness, and lots of literal wanking (you don't want to know).
It's frankly very sexist and exploitative, which I did not appreciate when I picked it up at 14. I read on Amazon that past the point I stopped reading, there is a lot of Islamophobia as well.
Hmmm I remember reading the books a few years ago but I don't recall anything particularly objectionable about it.
Slade is actually a pretty right-wing guy, Salvation War makes that pretty clear in places.Isn't he the guy who wrote the New Atheist revenge fantasy The Salvation War?
Isn't New Atheism just right-wing atheism anyway?Slade is actually a pretty right-wing guy, Salvation War makes that pretty clear in places.
I don't think Slade's actually an atheist, he's pretty clearly a neocon. SDN tends to be left-populist militarist and atheist from a left-wing perspective, I think the perceived pro-atheist elements of Salvation War were just to keep Slade's social capital on SDN.Isn't New Atheism just right-wing atheism anyway?
Ah, makes sense.I don't think Slade's actually an atheist, he's pretty clearly a neocon. SDN tends to be left-populist militarist and atheist from a left-wing perspective, I think the perceived pro-atheist elements of Salvation War were just to keep Slade's social capital on SDN.
If he were just a neocon, why wouldn't he make the enemy force the Norse gods or something instead of deliberately picking the most offensive choice imaginable?Ah, makes sense.
Admittedly, given how a good portion of the New Atheism crowd has ended up going and joining the Trumpean sphere (do we have a good term for the more moderate parts of his faction i.e. Kirk? I don't think it's fair to call everyone a Neo-Reactionary), it's not particularly difficult to imagine him holding both views simultaneously.
I also feel TNO is a wank , but it is able to properly show how idiotic and ludicrous most of Germany's plans were , and that the Nazis would have eventually failed regardlessObviously the Draka and Man in the High Castle are poster children for wanks, but The New Order: Last Days of Europe is also an egregious one.
TNO is a bad joke that runs on bad takes and cringey memes. It ironically becomes a straightforward Nazi wank, despite its protestations.I also feel TNO is a wank , but it is able to properly show how idiotic and ludicrous most of Germany's plans were , and that the Nazis would have eventually failed regardless
Because this was Stardestroyer.net in the Bush era. A website infamous for its love of performative vituperation and fond of what was at the time considered "edgy left-wing" politics. (they've since mellowed out a bit, I've heard)If he were just a neocon, why wouldn't he make the enemy force the Norse gods or something instead of deliberately picking the most offensive choice imaginable?
Neoreaction is more like “Make a white ethnostate in the Pacific Northwest!”, whereas neocons don’t like to say the worst parts outloud.If he were just a neocon, why wouldn't he make the enemy force the Norse gods or something instead of deliberately picking the most offensive choice imaginable?