Just out of curiosity: do people tend to fixate on the ARW and French Revolutionary/Napoleonic Wars because they view them as inherently more interesting/important than the other major 18th century wars, or are the Wars of Spanish/Austrian/Polish Succession, 7 Years War, and the numerous Turkish wars simply less well known. Ditto for Persia/India during this time period.
Though most of the 18th century wars in Europe before the ARW were characterized by minimal changes in borders, they all featured battles fought using original tactics by generals struggling against profound logistical and political limitations.
As for the Far East during this time, battles still involved a far greater number of soldiers than in the West. At the third battle of Panipat (1761) there were over 500,000 men fighting on either side in total. The Yongzheng Emperor could send over 250,000 men to invade Tibet during the same time period. Admittedly, many of the troops would be considered "rabble" by European standards, but they still fought and died.
On a lighter note, would anyone nominate James Wolfe?